Atlas of Gastrointestinal Pathology: A Pattern Based Approach to Non-Neoplastic Biopsies, 1rd Edition

NEAR MISSES

AMYLOIDOSIS

Figure 2.255 Amyloidosis involving antral mucosa. At low power, slight eosinophilic material focally expands the lamina propria.

Figure 2.256 Amyloidosis involving antral mucosa. Higher power shows the acellular eosinophilic material.

Figure 2.257 Amyloidosis involving antral mucosa (Congo Red). Amyloid is orange on direct light and apple green with polarized light (Congo Red) (not shown).

Amyloidosis is notoriously easy to miss, unless carefully searched for on every biopsy (Figs. 2.255 and 2.256). On low power, this antral biopsy looks almost normal, but on high power a subtle amorphous pink deposit is focally seen. The corresponding Congo red is positive for amyloid, confirming the H&E impressions (Fig. 2.257). This patient was ultimately found to have a plasma cell dyscrasia.

APOPTOTIC BODY PROMINENCE

Figure 2.258 Apoptotic gastropathy. Apoptotic bodies are tiny bits of nuclear debris or dust that are often variably sized (arrowheads), in contrast to lymphocytes (arrows).

As with every biopsy, apoptotic body evaluation is part of the routine biopsy assessment and requires at least a few fields with the 40× objective (Fig. 2.258). In the stomach, one apoptotic body per 100 glands is normal, so it takes very few apoptotic bodies to cross the required threshold for apoptotic gastropathy. Occasionally, lymphocytes can raise concerns for apoptotic bodies, but with experience the distinction is more easily made: apoptotic bodies are tiny bits of nuclear debris or dust that are often variably sized; lymphocytes are larger and more uniform in size (Figs. 2.258 and 2.259). Apoptotic gastropathy is most commonly seen in the following settings:

Figure 2.259 Apoptotic gastropathy. CMV viral cytopathic effect is seen (arrow) with nuclear megaly and prominent nucleoli, in addition to a mild prominence of apoptotic bodies (arrowheads). A CMV immunostain was positive. In this case, the patient had a history of Hodgkin lymphoma, bone marrow transplant, and febrile diarrhea. Excess apoptotic bodies can be a valuable red flag to the underlying (treatable) diagnosis.

• Infection (Helicobacter, CMV, among others)

• Medication (i.e., NSAIDS and CellCept (Mycophenolate) injury, among others)195197

• Graft versus Host Disease (See also Graft versus Host Disease, Lymphocytic Esophagitis Pattern, Esophagus Chapter)

• Immune-Mediated Disease

POORLY DIFFERENTIATED ADENOCARCINOMA WITH SIGNET RING CELL FEATURES

Figure 2.260 Metastatic lobular breast carcinoma.

Figure 2.261 Metastatic lobular breast carcinoma. Atypical stromal cells are seen (bracket).

Figure 2.262 Metastatic lobular breast carcinoma. Pleomorphic cells are seen with abundant pink cytoplasm (arrowheads).

This specimen is from a gastric resection for gastric bypass surgery (Figs. 2.2602.262). The surgeon detected a firm focus at the proximal margin which she submitted for frozen section analysis. At low power, unremarkable oxyntic-type mucosa is seen in the upper left corner, in addition to fragments of squamous mucosa (Fig. 2.260). At higher power, the lamina propria appears a bit more cellular than usual, prompting closer inspection (bracket) (Fig. 2.261). On highest power, the nuclei have approximately the same appearance as those of the neighboring endothelial cells (not particularly hyperchromatic and not particularly large); however, histiocytes do not have such an infiltrative architecture (arrowheads) (Fig. 2.262). A CAM5.2 IHC highlights all of the indicated cells, supporting a diagnosis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features (Fig. 2.263). But the story does not conclude here. Every poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features in a woman must be accompanied by breast markers to exclude a metastatic lobular carcinoma. In this case, the atypical cells also show strong nuclear positivity for progesterone receptor, supporting the diagnosis of metastatic lobular carcinoma (Fig. 2.264). The patient ultimately was found to have a breast mass requiring subsequent mastectomy.

Figure 2.263 Metastatic lobular breast carcinoma (CAM5.2). The atypical cells are diffusely cytokeratin reactive, supporting the diagnosis of poorly differentiated carcinoma with signet ring cell features.

Figure 2.264 Metastatic lobular breast carcinoma (Progesterone receptor). Every poorly differentiated carcinoma with signet ring cell features in a woman should be evaluated with breast markers. This case was PR reactive, and a subsequent breast mass was found.

RUSSELL BODY GASTRITIS

Figure 2.265 Russell body gastritis.

Figure 2.266 Russell body gastritis.

Figure 2.267 Russell body gastritis (PAS).

This case represents a not uncommon consultation case, typically submitted with a concern for poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma (Figs. 2.2652.267). At lowest power, the gastric mucosa shows peculiar cells just below the surface epithelium and dispersed between gastric pits. These cells have brightly eosinophilic cytoplasm (Fig. 2.265). On higher power, the pink cytoplasmic inclusions are smooth and homogenous, and the nuclear cytology is bland: no hyperchromasia, pleomorphism, nor mitotic figures are seen (Fig. 2.266). Under oil magnification, the bland nature of the nuclear cytology is best appreciated (PAS). Note, the nuclei of the indicated cells are much smaller than those in the adjoining foveolar epithelium and the cytoplasmic inclusions are PAS reactive (Fig. 2.267). This case is an example of Russell body gastritis. Russell bodies are bright pink cytoplasmic inclusions derived from entrapped immunoglobulins that are lodged in the rough endoplasmic reticulum of plasma cells. Supporting their benign nature, Russell bodies display a mixed kappa and lambda light chain distribution. When plasma cells acquire prominent Russell bodies, as in this case, they are termed “Mott cells.” In the stomach, Russell bodies are commonly associated with Helicobacter gastritis, but they can theoretically be seen with any type of long-standing chronic inflammation. Importantly, Mott cells can be mimics of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma since both can be sparsely distributed in a quasi-infiltrative pattern and have PAS+ cytoplasmic inclusions (Figs. 2.266 and 2.267 vs. Figs. 2.2682.269); however, Mott cells display a uniformly bland cytology. In Figure 2.267, for example, note that the Mott cell nuclei are smaller than those of the neighboring foveolar epithelium nuclei. In comparison, the nuclei of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma are typically larger than normal cells and display irregular nuclear contours, prominent nucleoli, and hyperchromasia (Figs. 2.268 and 2.269). In challenging cases, a cytokeratin stain can be helpful (the Mott cells are cytokeratin nonreactive, whereas the adenocarcinoma is cytokeratin reactive).

Figure 2.268 Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma.

Figure 2.269 Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma (PAS).

MUCUS-NECK CELLS

Figure 2.270 Mucus neck cells (arrowheads).

Figure 2.271 Mucus neck cells.

Figure 2.272 Mucus neck cells (PAS, arrowheads).

This near miss case highlights another common mimic of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell features (Figs. 2.2702.272). Mucus neck cells are normal cellular constituents and, as their name implies, they are mucus secreting cells found at the neck of the gastric pits. Occasionally, these cells become dislodged, dispersed, or crushed, in which case their eccentrically placed nuclei can raise concerns for a signet ring cell adenocarcinoma. In this case, the abused tissue fragment features quite a few dislodged mucus neck cells in the luminal space (Fig. 2.270). Oil immersion is necessary to detect the miniscule nucleoli of mucus neck cells (unlike adenocarcinoma); at this power the nuclear contours are smooth and uniform, the chromatin is fine, and no mitotic figures are seen, all features supporting a benign diagnosis (Fig. 2.271). These cells display cytoplasmic PAS reactivity, but again the nuclear cytologic features are bland (Fig. 2.272). In addition to the histology, the clinical setting is also reassuring&emdash;the biopsy originated from an 8-year-old boy with eosinophilic esophagitis who had an unremarkable endoscopic examination.

SARCINA

Figure 2.273 Sarcina. Luminal debris is often ignored, but this example shows a mixture of Sarcina (arrow) and Micrococcus (arrowheads) organisms. Both Sarcina and Micrococcus can be found in tetrad formations, but Micrococcus grows in dense bacterial micro-colonies clusters and each organism is smaller.

Figure 2.274 Sarcina in a gastric ulcer. These Sarcina tetrads are embedded within a gastric ulcer of a patient with delayed gastric emptying. Treatment of the gastric ulcer, such as with sucralfate, is reasonable given the rare reported cases of emphysematous gastritis and gastric perforation associated with Sarcina.

Sarcina is a Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria with carbohydrate fermentative metabolism as the sole energy source (Figs. 2.273 and 2.274).198 Although the organism is ubiquitous in the environment and is not invasive, Sarcina can cause deadly gaseous bloat in livestock and rare cases of emphysematous gastritis and gastric perforation have been described in humans. The organism is found most commonly in patients with delayed gastric emptying (gastroparesis, nearby mass, obstruction). The presence of an underlying mucosal defect, such as an erosion or ulceration, may predispose patients to more serious sequelae from this otherwise ubiquitous and noninvasive organism. The characteristic tetrad or octet packets of Sarcina organisms are approximately 10 microns across, or the size of a lymphocyte nucleus, and are typically found intermixed with luminal debris. The unusual morphology is the result of cell division in at least two planes of growth, and this morphologic finding is diagnostic for the organism on routine H&E stain. Micrococcus species also forms a tetrad and, consequently, is an important Sarcina mimic. Micrococcus, however, clusters in dense bacterial microcolonies and is considerably smaller (0.5 micron individual compared to Sarcina’s larger three micron size).

FAQ: What are Sarcina treatment recommendations?

Answer: At this time, there are no recommended guidelines for Sarcina treatment. In patients without underlying mucosal defects, there is no evidence to show that eradication of the bacteria with antibiotics is effective or necessary. Because the organism can be found in vegetable matter, air, soil, and the feces of healthy humans, it is unlikely that Sarcina causes injury in the absence of an underlying mucosal defect; however, treatment of any underlying mucosal erosion or ulceration, if present, would be reasonable. The role of antibiotics in humans has not been fully investigated.

BEZOAR AND OTHER FOREIGN MATERIAL

Figure 2.275 Trichobezoar. This is a gross photograph of a hair bezoar removed from the stomach of a patient who was ingesting hair.

A “bezoar” is a ball of swallowed foreign material that collects in the stomach and fails to pass through the intestines (Fig. 2.275). Common examples include hair, fiber, food, or medication. Often, these are recognized at the time of endoscopy and are simply documented as a gross finding. Occasionally, however, undigested material can pose unusual challenges by mimicking other disease entities (Figs. 2.276and 2.277). An important histologic clue to look for is whether there is tissue reaction or inflammation, the absence of which should raise suspicion that the findings may represent inert luminal debris.

Figure 2.276 Ingested mushroom. These fungal hyphae were seen in the duodenal biopsy of a patient who had undergone bone marrow transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In the clinical setting of immunosuppression, it is reasonable to consider an fungal infection; however, the endoscopic impression was that of foreign material, such as ingested food.

Figure 2.277 Ingested mushroom. Lower power of previous figure. The lack of tissue invasion and tissue inflammation is a strong indicator that the fungal elements in the field are not pathogenic. Indeed, further investigation revealed this patient had an omelet with mushrooms prior to endoscopy.

MAST CELL DISEASE

Figure 2.278 Gastric involvement by systemic mastocytosis. At scanning magnification, this gastric oxyntic mucosa might appear to have a mere superficial erosion (arrow); however, this patient has a significant past medical history for systemic mastocytosis.

Figure 2.279 Gastric involvement by systemic mastocytosis. Higher magnification corresponding to the area of “erosion” seen in previous figure. Even with the knowledge of the patient’s clinical history, and high-power examination, this case is challenging on routine H&E stain.

Figure 2.280 Gastric involvement by systemic mastocytosis. Oil immersion 100× photomicrograph of mast cells within the “erosion” seen in previous figures. The mast cells have clear to eosinophilic granular cytoplasm with centrally located nuclei. These mast cells show some nuclear atypia with mild hyperchromasia and spindle cell morphology.

Figure 2.281 Gastric involvement by systemic mastocytosis (CD117 immunostain). A CD117 immunostain of the case shown in the previous figure highlights clusters of mast cells in the area of erosion.

Figure 2.282 Gastric involvement by systemic mastocytosis (CD25 immunostain). A CD25 immunostain of the case shown in the previous figures shows aberrant expression within the mast cells. This presence of mast cell clusters in an extracutaneous site that express CD25 fulfills the criteria for diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (World Health Organization: one major and one minor criterion).

Mastocytosis refers to a group of disorders characterized by excessive mast cell accumulation in one or multiple tissues (Figs. 2.2782.280).199201 Involvement of neoplastic mast cells in the gastrointestinal tract fulfills one major criterion of the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria for systemic mastocytosis. In addition, abnormal expression of CD2 or CD25 by immunohistochemistry in these cells satisfies one minor criterion and fulfills the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis (Figs. 2.281 and 2.282).

References

1. Chandrasoma PT, Der R, Ma Y, et al. Histology of the gastroesophageal junction: An autopsy study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000;24(3):402–409.

2. De Hertogh G, Van Eyken P, Ectors N, et al. On the existence and location of cardiac mucosa: An autopsy study in embryos, fetuses, and infants. Gut. 2003;52(6):791–796.

3. Derdoy JJ, Bergwerk A, Cohen H, et al. The gastric cardia: To be or not to be? Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27(4):499–504.

4. Forte JG, Forte TM, Black JA, et al. Correlation of parietal cell structure and function. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1983;(5 suppl 1):17–27.

5. Glickman JN, Fox V, Antonioli DA, et al. Morphology of the cardia and significance of carditis in pediatric patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(8):1032–1039.

6. Kimura K. Chronological transition of the fundic-pyloric border determined by stepwise biopsy of the lesser and greater curvatures of the stomach. Gastroenterology. 1972;63(4):584–592.

7. Listrom MB, Fenoglio-Preiser CM. Lymphatic distribution of the stomach in normal, inflammatory, hyperplastic, and neoplastic tissue. Gastroenterology. 1987;93(3):506–514.

8. Odze RD. Unraveling the mystery of the gastroesophageal junction: A pathologist’s perspective. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(8):1853–1867.

9. Park YS, Park HJ, Kang GH, et al. Histology of gastroesophageal junction in fetal and pediatric autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127(4):451–455.

10. Sarbia M, Donner A, Gabbert HE. Histopathology of the gastroesophageal junction: A study on 36 operation specimens. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002;26(9):1207–1212.

11. Solcia E, Fiocca R, Villani L, et al. Hyperplastic, dysplastic, and neoplastic enterochromaffin-like-cell proliferations of the gastric mucosa. Classification and histogenesis. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(suppl 1):S1–S7.

12. Stave R, Brandtzaeg P. Immunohistochemical investigation of gastrin-producing cells (G cells). The distribution of g cells in resected human stomachs. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1976;11(7):705–712.

13. Sternberg SS, ed. Histology for Pathologists. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1997.

14. Zhou H, Greco MA, Daum F, et al. Origin of cardiac mucosa: Ontogenic consideration. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2001;4(4):358–363.

15. Maguilnik I, Neumann WL, Sonnenberg A, et al. Reactive gastropathy is associated with inflammatory conditions throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 36(8):736–743.

16. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, et al. Classification and grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney System. International Workshop on the Histopathology of Gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J Surg Pathol.1996;20(10):1161–1181.

17. Appelman HD. Gastritis: Terminology, etiology, and clinicopathological correlations: Another biased view. Hum Pathol. 1994;25(10):1006–1019.

18. Offerhaus GJ, van de Stadt J, Huibregtse K, et al. The mucosa of the gastric remnant harboring malignancy. Histologic findings in the biopsy specimens of 504 asymptomatic patients 15 to 46 years after partial gastrectomy with emphasis on nonmalignant lesions.Cancer. 1989;64(3):698–703.

19. Sobala GM, King RF, Axon AT, et al. Reflux gastritis in the intact stomach. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43(4):303–306.

20. Graham DY, Smith JL. Gastroduodenal complications of chronic NSAID therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83(10):1081–1084.

21. Genta RM. Differential diagnosis of reactive gastropathy. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2005;22(4):273–283.

22. Schoenfeld P, Kimmey MB, Scheiman J, et al. Review article: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastrointestinal complications–guidelines for prevention and treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.1999;13(10):1273–1285.

23. Parfitt JR, Driman DK. Pathological effects of drugs on the gastrointestinal tract: A review. Hum Pathol. 2007;38(4):527–536.

24. Chen Z, Scudiere JR, Montgomery E. Medication-induced upper gastrointestinal tract injury. J Clin Pathol. 2009;62(2):113–119.

25. Medlicott SA, Ma M, Misra T, et al. Vascular wall degeneration in doxycycline-related esophagitis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(7):1114–1115.

26. Xiao SY, Zhao L, Hart J, et al. Doxycycline-induced gastric and esophageal mucosal injuries with vascular degeneration. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(7):1115–1116.

27. Xiao SY, Zhao L, Hart J, et al. Gastric mucosal necrosis with vascular degeneration induced by doxycycline. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(2):259–263.

28. Wallace JL. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastroenteropathy: The second hundred years. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(3):1000–1016.

29. Mitchell HM. The epidemiology of Helicobacter pylori. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1999;241:11–30.

30. Batts KP, Ketover S, Kakar S, et al. Appropriate use of special stains for identifying Helicobacter pylori: Recommendations from the Rodger C. Haggitt Gastrointestinal Pathology Society. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(11):e12–e22.

31. Kelly SM, Pitcher MC, Farmery SM, et al. Isolation of Helicobacter pylori from feces of patients with dyspepsia in the United Kingdom. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(6):1671–1674.

32. Kandulski A, Selgrad M, Malfertheiner P. Helicobacter pylori infection: A clinical overview. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40(8):619–626.

33. Momtaz H, Souod N, Dabiri H, et al. Study of Helicobacter pylori genotype status in saliva, dental plaques, stool and gastric biopsy samples. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(17):2105–2111.

34. Parsonnet J, Shmuely H, Haggerty T. Fecal and oral shedding of Helicobacter pylori from healthy infected adults. Jama. 1999;282(23):2240–2245.

35. Montalban C, Santon A, Boixeda D, et al. Regression of gastric high grade mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gut. 2001;49(4):584–587.

36. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(11):784–789.

37. Zullo A, Hassan C, Cristofari F, et al. Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on early stage gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(2):105–110.

38. Wu TT, Hamilton SR. Lymphocytic gastritis: Association with etiology and topology. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23(2):153–158.

39. Moran CJ, Kolman OK, Russell GJ, et al. Neutrophilic infiltration in gluten-sensitive enteropathy is neither uncommon nor insignificant: Assessment of duodenal biopsies from 267 pediatric and adult patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012;36(9):1339–1345.

40. Tagkalidis PP, Royce SG, Macrae FA, et al. Selective colonization by Helicobacter pylori of the deep gastric glands and intracellular canaliculi of parietal cells in the setting of chronic proton pump inhibitor use. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14(4):453–456.

41. Morgner A, Bayerdörffer E, Meining A, et al. Helicobacter heilmannii and gastric cancer. Lancet. 1995;346(8973):511–512.

42. Morgner A, Lehn N, Andersen LP, et al. Helicobacter heilmannii-associated primary gastric low-grade MALT lymphoma: Complete remission after curing the infection. Gastroenterology.2000;118(5):821–828.

43. Joo M, Kwak JE, Chang SH, et al. Helicobacter heilmannii-associated gastritis: Clinicopathologic findings and comparison with Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis. J Korean Med Sci. 2007;22(1):63–69.

44. Stolte M, Kroher G, Meining A, et al. A comparison of Helicobacter pylori and H. heilmannii gastritis. A matched control study involving 404 patients. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(1):28–33.

45. Singhal AV, Sepulveda AR. Helicobacter heilmannii gastritis: A case study with review of literature. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(11):1537–1539.

46. You DM, Johnson MD. Cytomegalovirus infection and the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2012;14(4):334–342.

47. Xiao SY, Hart J. Marked gastric foveolar hyperplasia associated with active cytomegalovirus infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96(1):223–226.

48. Agaimy A, Mudter J, Märkl B, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection presenting as isolated inflammatory polyps of the gastrointestinal tract. Pathology. 2011;43(5):440–446.

49. Oberhuber G, Puspok A, Oesterreicher C, et al. Focally enhanced gastritis: A frequent type of gastritis in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1997;112(3):698–706.

50. McHugh JB, Gopal P, Greenson JK. The clinical significance of focally enhanced gastritis in children. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(2):295–299.

51. Xin W, Greenson JK. The clinical significance of focally enhanced gastritis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(10):1347–1351.

52. Sharif F, McDermott M, Dillon M, et al. Focally enhanced gastritis in children with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(6):1415–1420.

53. Ushiku T, Moran CJ, Lauwers GY. Focally enhanced gastritis in newly diagnosed pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(12):1882–1888.

54. Borch K, Ahren B, Ahlman H, et al. Gastric carcinoids: Biologic behavior and prognosis after differentiated treatment in relation to type. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):64–73.

55. Borch K, Renvall H, Liedberg G. Gastric endocrine cell hyperplasia and carcinoid tumors in pernicious anemia. Gastroenterology. 1985;88(3):638–648.

56. Carmel R, Johnson CS. Racial patterns in pernicious anemia. Early age at onset and increased frequency of intrinsic-factor antibody in black women. N Engl J Med. 1978;298(12):647–650.

57. Carmel R, Johnson CS, Weiner JM. Pernicious anemia in Latin Americans is not a disease of the elderly. Arch Intern Med. 1987;147(11):1995–1996.

58. Chlumska A, Boudova L, Benes Z, et al. Autoimmune gastritis. A clinicopathologic study of 25 cases. Cesk Patol. 2005;41(4):137–142.

59. Claeys D, Faller G, Appelmelk BJ, et al. The gastric H+,K+-ATPase is a major autoantigen in chronic Helicobacter pylori gastritis with body mucosa atrophy. Gastroenterology. 1998; 115(2):340–347.

60. Doglioni C, Laurino L, Dei Tos AP, et al. Pancreatic (acinar) metaplasia of the gastric mucosa. Histology, ultrastructure, immunocytochemistry, and clinicopathologic correlations of 101 cases. Am J Surg Pathol.1993;17(11):1134–1143.

61. Drumm B, Sherman P, Cutz E, et al. Association of Campylobacter pylori on the gastric mucosa with antral gastritis in children. N Engl J Med. 1987;316(25):1557–1561.

62. Eidt S, Oberhuber G, Schneider A, et al. The histopathological spectrum of type A gastritis. Pathol Res Pract. 1996;192(2):101–106.

63. Genta RM, Graham DY. Comparison of biopsy sites for the histopathologic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: A topographic study of H. pylori density and distribution. Gastrointest Endosc.1994;40(3):342–345.

64. Genta RM, Hamner HW. The significance of lymphoid follicles in the interpretation of gastric biopsy specimens. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1994;118(7):740–743.

65. Genta RM, Hamner HW, Graham DY. Gastric lymphoid follicles in Helicobacter pylori infection: Frequency, distribution, and response to triple therapy. Hum Pathol. 1993;24(6):577–583.

66. Genta RM, Lew GM, Graham DY. Changes in the gastric mucosa following eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Mod Pathol. 1993;6(3):281–289.

67. Graham DY, Opekun AR, Yamaoka Y, et al. Early events in proton pump inhibitor-associated exacerbation of corpus gastritis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17(2):193–200.

68. Hung OY, Maithel SK, Willingham FF, et al. Hypergastrinemia, type 1 gastric carcinoid tumors: Diagnosis and management. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(25):e713–e715.

69. Irvine WJ, Cullen DR, Mawhinney H. Natural history of autoimmune achlorhydric atrophic gastritis. A 1–15-year follow-up study. Lancet. 1974;2(7879):482–485.

70. Karlsson FA, Burman P, Loof L, et al. Major parietal cell antigen in autoimmune gastritis with pernicious anemia is the acid-producing H+,K+-adenosine triphosphatase of the stomach. J Clin Invest.1988;81(2):475–479.

71. Kuipers EJ, Uyterlinde AM, Pena AS, et al. Increase of Helicobacter pylori-associated corpus gastritis during acid suppressive therapy: Implications for long-term safety. Am J Gastroenterol.1995;90(9):1401–1406.

72. Kuipers EJ, Uyterlinde AM, Pena AS, et al. Long-term sequelae of Helicobacter pylori gastritis. Lancet. 1995;345(8964):1525–1528.

73. Lambert R. Chronic gastritis. A critical study of the progressive atrophy of the gastric mucosa. Digestion. 1972;7(1):83–126.

74. Lewin KJ, Dowling F, Wright JP, et al. Gastric morphology and serum gastrin levels in pernicious anaemia. Gut. 1976;17(7):551–560.

75. Meining A, Stolte M, Hatz R, et al. Differing degree and distribution of gastritis in Helicobacter pylori-associated diseases. Virchows Arch. 1997;431(1):11–15.

76. Miehlke S, Hackelsberger A, Meining A, et al. Histological diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori gastritis is predictive of a high risk of gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1997;73(6):837–879.

77. Park JY, Cornish TC, Lam-Himlin D, et al. Gastric lesions in patients with autoimmune metaplastic atrophic gastritis (AMAG) in a tertiary care setting. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(11):1591–1598.

78. Recavarren-Arce S, Leon-Barua R, Cok J, et al. Helicobacter pylori and progressive gastric pathology that predisposes to gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1991;181:51–57.

79. Robinson M. Review article: Current perspectives on hypergastrinaemia and enterochromaffin-like-cell hyperplasia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999;5(13 suppl):5–10.

80. Schafer LW, Larson DE, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Risk of development of gastric carcinoma in patients with pernicious anemia: A population-based study in Rochester, Minnesota. Mayo Clin Proc.1985;60(7):444–448.

81. Siurala M, Salmi HJ. Long-term follow-up of subjects with superficial gastritis or a normal gastric mucosa. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1971;6(5):459–463.

82. Sjoblom SM, Sipponen P, Karonen SL, et al. Mucosal argyrophil endocrine cells in pernicious anaemia and upper gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours. J Clin Pathol. 1989;42(4):371–377.

83. Stemmermann GN, Hayashi T. Intestinal metaplasia of the gastric mucosa: A gross and microscopic study of its distribution in various disease states. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1968;41(3):627–634.

84. Stolte M, Eidt S. Helicobacter pylori and the evolution of gastritis. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;214:13–16; discussion 21–23.

85. Strickland RG, Bhathal PS, Korman MG, et al. Serum gastrin and the antral mucosa in atrophic gastritis. Br Med J. 1971;4(5785):451–453.

86. Torbenson M, Abraham SC, Boitnott J, et al. Autoimmune gastritis: Distinct histological and immunohistochemical findings before complete loss of oxyntic glands. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(2):102–109.

87. Villako K, Kekki M, Tamm A, et al. Development and progression of chronic gastritis in the antrum and body mucosa: Results of long-term follow-up examinations. Ann Clin Res. 1986; 18(3):121–123.

88. Walsh JH. Role of gastrin as a trophic hormone. Digestion. 1990;47(suppl 1):11–16; discussion 49–52.

89. Bettington M, Brown I. Autoimmune gastritis: Novel clues to histological diagnosis. Pathology. 2013;45(2):145–149.

90. Carney JA. Gastric mucosal lymphoid follicles: Histology, distribution, frequency, and etiologic features. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(7):1019–1024.

91. De Giacomo C, Gianatti A, Negrini R, et al. Lymphocytic gastritis: A positive relationship with celiac disease. J Pediatr. 1994;124(1):57–62.

92. Haot J, Hamichi L, Wallez L, et al. Lymphocytic gastritis: A newly described entity: A retrospective endoscopic and histological study. Gut. 1988;29(9):1258–1264.

93. Haot J, Jouret A, Willette M, et al. Lymphocytic gastritis–prospective study of its relationship with varioliform gastritis. Gut. 1990;31(3):282–285.

94. Lynch DA, Sobala GM, Dixon MF, et al. Lymphocytic gastritis and associated small bowel disease: A diffuse lymphocytic gastroenteropathy? J Clin Pathol. 1995;48(10):939–945.

95. Madisch A, Miehlke S, Neuber F, et al. Healing of lymphocytic gastritis after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy–a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23(4):473–479.

96. Muller H, Volkholz H, Stolte M. Healing of lymphocytic gastritis by eradication of Helicobacter pylori. Digestion. 2001;63(1):14–19.

97. Oberhuber G, Bodingbauer M, Mosberger I, et al. High proportion of granzyme B-positive (activated) intraepithelial and lamina propria lymphocytes in lymphocytic gastritis. Am J Surg Pathol.1998;22(4):450–458.

98. Daniels JA, Lederman HM, Maitra A, et al. Gastrointestinal tract pathology in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID): A clinicopathologic study and review. Am J Surg Pathol.2007;31(12):1800–1812.

99. Rubio-Tapia A, Herman ML, Ludvigsson JF, et al. Severe spruelike enteropathy associated with olmesartan. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(8):732–738.

100. Ruget O, Burtin P, Cerez H, et al. [Chronic diarrhea associated with villous atrophy and lymphocytic gastritis, caused by ticlopidine]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1992;16(3):290.

101. Dixon MF, Wyatt JI, Burke DA, et al. Lymphocytic gastritis–relationship to Campylobacter pylori infection. J Pathol. 1988;154(2):125–132.

102. Feeley KM, Heneghan MA, Stevens FM, et al. Lymphocytic gastritis and coeliac disease: Evidence of a positive association. J Clin Pathol. 1998;51(3):207–210.

103. Hayat M, Arora DS, Dixon MF, et al. Effects of Helicobacter pylori eradication on the natural history of lymphocytic gastritis. Gut. 1999;45(4):495–498.

104. Niemela S, Karttunen T, Kerola T, et al. Ten year follow up study of lymphocytic gastritis: Further evidence on Helicobacter pylori as a cause of lymphocytic gastritis and corpus gastritis. J Clin Pathol.1995;48(12):1111–1116.

105. Alsaigh N, Odze R, Goldman H, et al. Gastric and esophageal intraepithelial lymphocytes in pediatric celiac disease. Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20(7):865–870.

106. Karttunen T, Niemela S. Lymphocytic gastritis and coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol. 1990;43(5):436–437.

107. Nenna R, Magliocca FM, Tiberti C, et al. Endoscopic and histological gastric lesions in children with celiac disease: Mucosal involvement is not only confined to the duodenum. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;55(6):728–732.

108. Wolber R, Owen D, DelBuono L, et al. Lymphocytic gastritis in patients with celiac sprue or spruelike intestinal disease. Gastroenterology. 1990;98(2):310–315.

109. Gopal P, McKenna BJ. The collagenous gastroenteritides: Similarities and differences. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(10):1485–1489.

110. Jain R, Chetty R. Collagenous gastritis. Int J Surg Pathol. 2010;18(6):534–536.

111. Leung ST, Chandan VS, Murray JA, et al. Collagenous gastritis: Histopathologic features and association with other gastrointestinal diseases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(5):788–798.

112. Stancu M, De Petris G, Palumbo TP, et al. Collagenous gastritis associated with lymphocytic gastritis and celiac disease. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125(12):1579–1584.

113. Collins MH. Histopathology associated with eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009;29(1):109–117, x-xi.

114. DeBrosse CW, Case JW, Putnam PE, et al. Quantity and distribution of eosinophils in the gastrointestinal tract of children. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2006;9(3):210–218.

115. Lwin T, Melton SD, Genta RM. Eosinophilic gastritis: Histopathological characterization and quantification of the normal gastric eosinophil content. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(4):556–563.

116. Papadopoulos AA, Tzathas C, Polymeros D, et al. Symptomatic eosinophilic gastritis cured with Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gut. 2005;54(12):1822.

117. Pascal RR, Gramlich TL, Parker KM, et al. Geographic variations in eosinophil concentration in normal colonic mucosa. Mod Pathol. 1997;10(4):363–365.

118. Polydorides AD, Banner BF, Hannaway PJ, et al. Evaluation of site-specific and seasonal variation in colonic mucosal eosinophils. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(6):832–836.

119. Talley NJ, Walker MM, Aro P, et al. Non-ulcer dyspepsia and duodenal eosinophilia: An adult endoscopic population-based case-control study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(10):1175–1183.

120. Ammoury RF, Rosenman MB, Roettcher D, et al. Incidental gastric eosinophils in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis: Do they matter? J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;51(6):723–726.

121. Khan S, Orenstein SR. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: Epidemiology, diagnosis and management. Paediatr Drugs. 2002;4(9):563–570.

122. Sheikh RA, Prindiville TP, Pecha RE, et al. Unusual presentations of eosinophilic gastroenteritis: Case series and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(17):2156–2161.

123. Anttila VJ, Valtonen M. Carbamazepine-induced eosinophilic colitis. Epilepsia. 1992;33(1):119–121.

124. Barak N, Hart J, Sitrin MD. Enalapril-induced eosinophilic gastroenteritis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33(2):157–158.

125. Bridges AJ, Marshall JB, Diaz-Arias AA. Acute eosinophilic colitis and hypersensitivity reaction associated with naproxen therapy. Am J Med. 1990;89(4):526–527.

126. Friedberg JW, Frankenburg FR, Burk J, et al. Clozapine-caused eosinophilic colitis. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 1995;7(2):97–98.

127. Jimenez-Saenz M, Gonzalez-Campora R, Linares-Santiago E, et al. Bleeding colonic ulcer and eosinophilic colitis: A rare complication of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J Clin Gastroenterol.2006;40(1):84–85.

128. Lange P, Oun H, Fuller S, et al. Eosinophilic colitis due to rifampicin. Lancet. 1994; 344(8932):1296–1297.

129. Martin DM, Goldman JA, Gilliam J, et al. Gold-induced eosinophilic enterocolitis: Response to oral cromolyn sodium. Gastroenterology. 1981;80(6):1567–1570.

130. Price AB. Pathology of drug-associated gastrointestinal disease. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003; 56(5):477–482.

131. Pusztaszeri MP, Genta RM, Cryer BL. Drug-induced injury in the gastrointestinal tract: Clinical and pathologic considerations. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;4(8):442–453.

132. Saeed SA, Integlia MJ, Pleskow RG, et al. Tacrolimus-associated eosinophilic gastroenterocolitis in pediatric liver transplant recipients: Role of potential food allergies in pathogenesis. Pediatr Transplant. 2006;10(6):730–735.

133. Gonsalves N. Food allergies and eosinophilic gastrointestinal illness. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2007;36(1):75–91, vi.

134. Pratt CA, Demain JG, Rathkopf MM. Food allergy and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders: Guiding our diagnosis and treatment. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2008;38(6):170–188.

135. Muraoka A, Suehiro I, Fujii M, et al. Acute gastric anisakiasis: 28 cases during the last 10 years. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41(12):2362–2365.

136. Rivasi F, Pampiglione S, Boldorini R, et al. Histopathology of gastric and duodenal Strongyloides stercoralis locations in fifteen immunocompromised subjects. Arch Pathol Lab Med.2006;130(12):1792–1798.

137. Bischoff SC, Wedemeyer J, Herrmann A, et al. Quantitative assessment of intestinal eosinophils and mast cells in inflammatory bowel disease. Histopathology. 1996;28(1):1–13.

138. Carvalho AT, Elia CC, de Souza HS, et al. Immunohistochemical study of intestinal eosinophils in inflammatory bowel disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36(2):120–125.

139. Baldini C, Talarico R, Della Rossa A, et al. Clinical manifestations and treatment of Churg-Strauss syndrome. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2010;36(3):527–543.

140. Barbie DA, Mangi AA, Lauwers GY. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis associated with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;38(10):883–886.

141. Blackshaw AJ, Levison DA. Eosinophilic infiltrates of the gastrointestinal tract. J Clin Pathol. 1986;39(1):1–7.

142. Oh HE, Chetty R. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis: A review. J Gastroenterol. 2008;43(10):741–750.

143. Carmack SW, Genta RM, Schuler CM, et al. The current spectrum of gastric polyps: A 1-year national study of over 120,000 patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(6):1524–1532.

144. Genta RM, Schuler CM, Robiou CI, et al. No association between gastric fundic gland polyps and gastrointestinal neoplasia in a study of over 100,000 patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.2009;7(8):849–854.

145. Thomson AB, Sauve MD, Kassam N, et al. Safety of the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(19):2323–2330.

146. Garrean S, Hering J, Saied A, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma arising from fundic gland polyps in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Am Surg. 2008;74(1):79–83.

147. Hofgärtner WT, Thorp M, Ramus MW, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma associated with fundic gland polyps in a patient with attenuated familial adenomatous polyposis. Am J Gastroenterol.1999;94(8):2275–2281.

148. Torbenson M, Lee JH, Cruz-Correa M, et al. Sporadic fundic gland polyposis: A clinical, histological, and molecular analysis. Mod Pathol. 2002;15(7):718–723.

149. Berna MJ, Hoffmann KM, Serrano J, et al. Serum gastrin in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: I. Prospective study of fasting serum gastrin in 309 patients from the National Institutes of Health and comparison with 2229 cases from the literature. Medicine (Baltimore). 2006;85(6):295–330.

150. Kumar KR, Iqbal R, Coss E, et al. Helicobacter gastritis induces changes in the oxyntic mucosa indistinguishable from the effects of proton pump inhibitors. Hum Pathol. 2013;44(12):2706–2710.

151. Lam-Himlin D, Park JY, Cornish TC, et al. Morphologic characterization of syndromic gastric polyps. Am J Surg Pathol. 2010;34(11):1656–1662.

152. Abraham SC, Singh VK, Yardley JH, et al. Hyperplastic polyps of the stomach: Associations with histologic patterns of gastritis and gastric atrophy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25(4):500–507.

153. Seshadri D, Karagiorgos N, Hyser MJ. A case of cronkhite-Canada syndrome and a review of gastrointestinal polyposis syndromes. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2012;8(3):197–201.

154. Lam-Himlin D, Christina AA, De Petris G. Gastric polyps and polyposis syndromes. Diagn Histopathol. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mpdhp.2013.12.002

155. Cronkhite LW, Canada WJ. Generalized gastrointestinal polyposis; an unusual syndrome of polyposis, pigmentation, alopecia and onychotrophia. N Engl J Med. 1955;252(24):1011–1015.

156. Daniel ES, Ludwig SL, Lewin KJ, et al. The Cronkhite-Canada Syndrome. An analysis of clinical and pathologic features and therapy in 55 patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 1982;61(5):293–309.

157. Lambrecht NW. Ménétrier’s disease of the stomach: A clinical challenge. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2011;13(6):513–517.

158. Beauchamp RD, Barnard JA, McCutchen CM, et al. Localization of transforming growth factor alpha and its receptor in gastric mucosal cells. Implications for a regulatory role in acid secretion and mucosal renewal. J Clin Invest. 1989;84(3):1017–1023.

159. Takagi H, Jhappan C, Sharp R, et al. Hypertrophic gastropathy resembling Ménétrier’s disease in transgenic mice overexpressing transforming growth factor alpha in the stomach. J Clin Invest.1992;90(3):1161–1167.

160. Kovacs AA, Churchill MA, Wood D, et al. Molecular and epidemiologic evaluations of a cluster of cases of Ménétrièr’s disease associated with cytomegalovirus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993;12(12):1011–1014.

161. Fiske WH, Tanksley J, Nam KT, et al. Efficacy of cetuximab in the treatment of Menetrier’s disease. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1(8):8ra18.

162. Settle SH, Washington K, Lind C, et al. Chronic treatment of Ménétrier’s disease with Erbitux: Clinical efficacy and insight into pathophysiology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;3(7):654–659.

163. Burdick JS, Chung E, Tanner G, et al. Treatment of Ménétrier’s disease with a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(23):1697–1701.

164. Burkart AL, Sheridan T, Lewin M, et al. Do sporadic Peutz–Jeghers polyps exist? Experience of a large teaching hospital. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(8):1209–1214.

165. Ectors NL, Dixon MF, Geboes KJ, et al. Granulomatous gastritis: A morphological and diagnostic approach. Histopathology. 1993;23(1):55–61.

166. Shapiro JL, Goldblum JR, Petras RE. A clinicopathologic study of 42 patients with granulomatous gastritis. Is there really an “idiopathic” granulomatous gastritis? Am J Surg Pathol. 1996;20(4):462–470.

167. Maeng L, Lee A, Choi K, et al. Granulomatous gastritis: A clinicopathologic analysis of 18 biopsy cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28(7):941–945.

168. Alimchandani M, Lai JP, Aung PP, et al. Gastrointestinal histopathology in chronic granulomatous disease: A study of 87 patients. Am J Surg Pathol. 2013;37(9):1365–1372.

169. Kalafateli M, Triantos CK, Nikolopoulou V, et al. Non-variceal gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis: A review. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57(11):2743–2754.

170. D’Amico G, De Franchis R, Group CS. Upper digestive bleeding in cirrhosis. Post-therapeutic outcome and prognostic indicators. Hepatology. 2003;38(3):599–612.

171. Afessa B, Kubilis PS. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with hepatic cirrhosis: Clinical course and mortality prediction. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(2):484–489.

172. Sarin SK, Misra SP, Singal A, et al. Evaluation of the incidence and significance of the “mosaic pattern” in patients with cirrhosis, noncirrhotic portal fibrosis, and extrahepatic obstruction. Am J Gastroenterol.1988;83(11):1235–1239.

173. Sarin SK, Sreenivas DV, Lahoti D, et al. Factors influencing development of portal hypertensive gastropathy in patients with portal hypertension. Gastroenterology. 1992;102(3):994–999.

174. Gostout CJ, Viggiano TR, Balm RK. Acute gastrointestinal bleeding from portal hypertensive gastropathy: Prevalence and clinical features. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88(12):2030–2033.

175. Ripoll C, Garcia-Tsao G. The management of portal hypertensive gastropathy and gastric antral vascular ectasia. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43(5):345–351.

176. Gostout CJ, Viggiano TR, Ahlquist DA, et al. The clinical and endoscopic spectrum of the watermelon stomach. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;15(3):256–263.

177. Tobin RW, Hackman RC, Kimmey MB, et al. Bleeding from gastric antral vascular ectasia in marrow transplant patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44(3):223–229.

178. Yamamoto M, Takahashi H, Akaike J, et al. Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) associated with systemic sclerosis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2008;37(4):315–316.

179. Suit PF, Petras RE, Bauer TW, et al. Gastric antral vascular ectasia. A histologic and morphometric study of “the watermelon stomach”. Am J Surg Pathol. 1987;11(10):750–757.

180. Payen JL, Calès P, Voigt JJ, et al. Severe portal hypertensive gastropathy and antral vascular ectasia are distinct entities in patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(1):138–144.

181. Crowder CD, Grabowski C, Inampudi S, et al. Selective internal radiation therapy-induced extrahepatic injury: An emerging cause of iatrogenic organ damage. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009; 33(7):963–975.

182. Ogawa F, Mino-Kenudson M, Shimizu M, et al. Gastroduodenitis associated with yttrium 90-microsphere selective internal radiation: An iatrogenic complication in need of recognition. Arch Pathol Lab Med.2008;132(11):1734–1738.

183. Haig A, Driman DK. Iron-induced mucosal injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract. Histopathology. 2006;48(7):808–812.

184. Abraham SC, Yardley JH, Wu TT. Erosive injury to the upper gastrointestinal tract in patients receiving iron medication: An underrecognized entity. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23(10):1241–1247.

185. Marginean EC, Bennick M, Cyczk J, et al. Gastric siderosis: Patterns and significance. Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;30(4):514–520.

186. Kibria R, Barde CJ. Pseudomelanosis of the stomach. Endoscopy. 2010;42(suppl 2):E60.

187. Antaki F, Irwin BC, Levi E. Rare occurrence of gastric pseudomelanosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(3 pt 1):599; author reply 600.

188. Weinstock LB, Katzman D, Wang HL. Pseudomelanosis of stomach, duodenum, and jejunum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58(4):578.

189. Hsieh TH, McCullough A, Aqel B. Gastric mucosal calcinosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 73(6):1282–1283.

190. Greenson JK, Trinidad SB, Pfeil SA, et al. Gastric mucosal calcinosis. Calcified aluminum phosphate deposits secondary to aluminum-containing antacids or sucralfate therapy in organ transplant patients. Am J Surg Pathol.1993;17(1):45–50.

191. Gorospe M, Fadare O. Gastric mucosal calcinosis: Clinicopathologic considerations. Adv Anat Pathol. 2007;14(3):224–228.

192. Avci Z, Alioglu B, Canan O, et al. Calcification of the gastric mucosa associated with tumor lysis syndrome in a child with non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2006;28(5):307–310.

193. Kennedy AS, Nutting C, Coldwell D, et al. Pathologic response and microdosimetry of (90)Y microspheres in man: Review of four explanted whole livers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.2004;60(5):1552–1563.

194. Neff R, Abdel-Misih R, Khatri J, et al. The toxicity of liver directed yttrium-90 microspheres in primary and metastatic liver tumors. Cancer Invest. 2008;26(2):173–177.

195. Fecker LF, Stockfleth E, Nindl I, et al. The role of apoptosis in therapy and prophylaxis of epithelial tumours by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Br J Dermatol. 2007;156 (suppl 3):25–33.

196. Jana NR. NSAIDs and apoptosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2008;65(9):1295–1301.

197. Nguyen T, Park JY, Scudiere JR, et al. Mycophenolic acid (cellcept and myofortic) induced injury of the upper GI tract. Am J Surg Pathol. 2009;33(9):1355–1363.

198. Lam-Himlin D, Tsiatis AC, Montgomery E, et al. Sarcina organisms in the gastrointestinal tract: A clinicopathologic and molecular study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(11):1700–1705.

199. Jensen RT. Gastrointestinal abnormalities and involvement in systemic mastocytosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2000;14(3):579–623.

200. Kirsch R, Geboes K, Shepherd NA, et al. Systemic mastocytosis involving the gastrointestinal tract: Clinicopathologic and molecular study of five cases. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(12):1508–1516.

201. Sokol H, Georgin-Lavialle S, Grandpeix-Guyodo C, et al. Gastrointestinal involvement and manifestations in systemic mastocytosis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2010;16(7):1247–1253.



If you find an error or have any questions, please email us at admin@doctorlib.org. Thank you!