Progestogens in Obstetrics and Gynecology 2015th Ed.

7. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

Yochai Bar Shavit1, Jaron Rabinovici2, 3 and Howard J. A. Carp2, 3

(1)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Israel

(2)

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, 52621, Israel

(3)

Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

Howard J. A. Carp

Email: carp@netvision.net.il

1 Introduction

Abnormal uterine bleeding is usually defined as vaginal bleeding in excess of 80 ml. Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is one of the most frequent gynecological conditions accounting for 11–13 % of new gynecological consultations in reproductive age women and up to 70 % of new consultations in perimenopausal women [1]. AUB is usually seen in adolescents, and perimenopausally, but may also occur in the reproductive years. There is no clear consensus on the clinical evaluation of the patient with abnormal bleeding. Initial evaluation should assess the source and clinical features of the bleeding, and exclude organic causes bleeding such as fibroids, polyps, carcinoma of cervix or endometrium, coagulation defects, and systemic disease. In this chapter, the term AUB will be used rather than the previous terms of menorrhagia, dysfunctional bleeding etc. as the term AUB allows uterine bleeding abnormalities to be classified by bleeding pattern and etiology. Basically, AUB can result from three major reasons: Blood coagulation disorders, hormonal imbalances, and anatomical or malignant disorders. Based on these three rough divisions, the classification of AUB is known by the acronym PALM-COEIN. This acronym is based on the first letters of the major causes of AUB which can be either imaged or visualized (PALM: polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyoma and malignancy or hyperplasia). The others (which cannot be imaged) are known as COEIN (Coagulopathy or AUB-C, ovulatory dysfunction or AUB-O, iatrogenic or AUB-I, endometrial factors AUB-E or not yet classified (AUB-N). There are three additional terms, to denote bleeding patterns, heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB), acute menstrual bleeding (AMB), and intermenstrual bleeding (IMB).

Progestogens are a significant factor in treatment. As outlined in other chapters, the choice of hormonal (progestogen) or surgical therapy varies according to the diagnosis, the patient’s needs and fertility desire. This chapter will discuss the different types of progestogen in use for AUB as well as other treatment modalities.

2 Physiology of Menstruation

Lockwood [2] has given a full account of the pathophysiology of menstruation and the changes in AUB. Briefly, following menstruation, repair of the functional layer takes place. Stem cells in the endometrial stratum basalis start to produce a new functional layer under the influence of estrogen secreted by the ripening follicle. The endometrial epithelial and stromal cells proliferate. The stromal cells express vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) which induces angiogenesis [3] and the endothelial cells express angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) [4]. In the secretory phase progesterone produced by the corpus luteum induces changes in the endometrium. Around the new blood vessels, progesterone augments expression of Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), from the stromal cells. Ang-1 stabilizes the vessels and blocks further angiogenesis. Progesterone also induces tissue factor (TF) mRNA and protein in the stromal cells [5]. TF is a receptor for coagulation factor VII and its active form, factor VIIa. TF initiates the clotting cascade, The cascade eventually leads to fibrin production. Decidualized stromal cells continue expressing TF throughout pregnancy [6] leading to the increased tendency to thrombosis in pregnancy. Progesterone also induces a second hemostatic protein, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1). In addition to its anti-fibrinolytic properties PAI-1 restrains trophoblast invasion [7]. Hence, the luteal phase is associated with hemostatic, anti-fibrinolytic and antiproteolytic properties.

In the absence of pregnancy, luteal regression leads to progesterone withdrawal. The falling progesterone level leads to reduction of TF and PAI-1 expression [8]. When the falling level of progesterone reaches a threshold the spiral arteries in the endometrial stratum basalis tightly coil and constrict. The vasoconstriction leads to ischemia and necrosis in the functional layer.

Progesterone also inhibits expression of metaloproteinases 2, 3 and 9 (MMP-2, 3 and 9) expression. Progesterone withdrawal augments MMP expression by endometrial stromal cells. Progesterone withdrawal is also associated with up-regulation of the neutrophil and macrophage chemoattractants, interleukin-8 (IL-8) and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1, respectively [9]. Thus, progesterone withdrawal is associated with increased MMP expression and chemokines which promote leukocyte infiltration which add to the proteolytic milieu, promoting menstrual bleeding and tissue sloughing. As the spiral arteries relax, there is bleeding into the necrotic endometrium which together with the chemical changes in the endometrium lead to menstruation. After progesterone withdrawal, there is an increase in prostaglandin (PG) synthesis and a decrease in PG metabolism [10]. PG synthesis via COX-2 is particularly relevant in the vascular compartment, since this provides an explanation for the action of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents in the treatment of menstrual disorders including heavy and painful periods. Moreover, prostaglandin E (PGE) synergises with IL-8 to increase capillary permeability, which facilitates the efflux of leucocytes into the surrounding tissues [11].

2.1 Pathophysiology in AUB

AUB is due to derangements in the physiological processes described above. There are two principal causes of abnormal endometrial bleeding: impaired endometrial hemostasis and damage to endometrial vessels due to aberrant angiogenesis.

2.1.1 Pathophysiology of Anovulatory Bleeding

Anovulatory AUB is usually seen in adolescents and premenopausal women. In both cases there is bleeding from an endometrium which has been stimulated by estrogen, without progesterone modulation. In adolescents, the unopposed estrogen is often due to immaturity of the feedback mechanisms in the hypothalamic pituitary ovarian axis. There are various possibilities. If the negative feedback requires only a certain amount of estrogen to inhibit FSH secretion, falling FSH levels will lead to follicular degeneration and falling estrogen levels. In these circumstances, the endometrial shadow will be thin on ultrasound, and bleeding may be irregular in occurrence with polymenorrhea or acyclic bleeding. Consequently, the estrogen level never reaches high enough levels to release LH.

Another possibility is that the negative feedback requires higher than normal levels of estrogen to trigger the negative feedback. In these circumstances, the excess levels of unopposed estrogen may lead to hyperplasia and oligomenorrhea with prolonged heavy bleeding. Again, there is no positive feedback and LH release.

In the perimenopause, estrogen production is low compared to the reproductive years. Prolonged exposure to unopposed estrogen may also lead to endomerial hyperplasia, and prolonged heavy bleeding.

The mechanism of AUB in anovulation is due to estrogen breakthrough or withdrawal alone. There are none of the stabilising effects of constantly increasing estrogen levels or of post-ovulatory progesterone. While VEGF and Ang-2 are produced there is not enough Ang-1 to stabilise the vessels and block excess angiogenesis. There is no TF or PAI-1. Hence local blood clotting is sub optimal as is the anti fibrinolytic effect of PAI. When estrogen levels stay stable or fall, the endometrial lining cannot be maintained as it is estrogen dependent. In the absence of progesterone, there is no orderly constriction of the spiral arterioles, and no orderly necrosis of the functional endometrium. The bleeding therefore occurs from excess of fragile blood vessels, with suboptimal thrombosis to stop the bleeding, and possibly excessive fibrinolysis.

2.1.2 Bleeding Dyscrasias

Bleeding diatheses generally present as heavy menstrual bleeding commencing at menarche and are present in 10.7 % of patients with HMB compared to 3.2 % of control women [12]. Von Willebrand’s disease is the most prevalent defect associated with HMB with a prevalence of 5–20 % [13]. Screening includes activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and ristocetin cofactor assay. Treatment consists of combined hormonal contraceptives which presumably induce TF and PAI-1 levels to compensate for the hemostatic defect.

3 Clinical Features

AUB usually occurs at the extremes of reproductive life, in adolescents and at the peri-menopause. However, AUB can also occur in the reproductive years. At the extremes of reproductive life, AUB is mainly associated with anovulation. At puberty, the negative feedback matures before the positive feedback. Therefore, the first few cycles have FSH secretion and subsequent estrogen production from ripening follicles. However, the negative feedback inhibits further FSH secretion, so the follicles cannot produce sufficient estrogen to trigger the positive feedback and LH production. The bleeding from an endometrium which has been stimulated by estrogen without endogenous or exogenous progesterone modification is due to a fragile, vascular endometrium, that lacks sufficient stromal support. In estrogen withdrawal bleeding, as one area of bleeding begins to heal, another area begins to slough, which results in erratic bleeding patterns and may manifest as prolonged and heavy and often irregular bleeding (HMB, IMB). In the perimenopause there is a diminished estrogen response to FSH. Again insufficient estrogen is produced, so that the positive feedback is not triggered. In all forms of AUB, the role of clinical examination and imaging are paramount to exclude organic disease. In the adolescent, the likelihood of organic disease such as malignancy is low. Clinical abdominal examination, usually gives little information as to cause. Additionally, if the adolescent is a virgin, vaginal examination is inappropriate. Consequently, if imaging is normal, there is probably little need to rule out organic disease. However, in the perimenopausal patient, the chance of organic disease is high, and there is a need for clinical examination to assess uterine size, speculum examination of the cervix, and cervical cytology to exclude malignant changes. Additionally, clinical examination is insufficient, and more invasive diagnostic techniques such as endometrial biopsy may be indicated.

The patient presents for consultation, because the amount of bleeding seems abnormal for her. There may not necessarily be more than 80 ml of blood lost, but it is necessary to accept the patients subjective distress of an abnormally perceived bleeding pattern. A quantitative estimate of the amount of bleeding can be obtained by a pictorial blood loss assessment chart. In this chart, the patient uses a points system for the amount that pads or tampons are soaked in blood, and for the number of days of bleeding. However, charting is often difficult to apply in clinical practice. Recently, smartphone applications have become available, in which the patient can record the amount of bleeding.

4 Diagnosis

The main step in the solution of clinical problems is the correct diagnosis of the disorder. A correct diagnosis of AUB begins with a clinical gynaecological evaluation of the integrity of the pelvic organs. Following this step further imaging and laboratory examination are in order to arrive at the right diagnosis and the right choice of therapy.

4.1 Importance of Imaging

Ultrasound, MRI, Hysteroscopy, and sonohysterography are used to image the uterus. These techniques are invaluable for making a diagnosis and directing treatment. Hysterosalpingography (HSG) was used in previous years. Although HSG can detect intra-cavity lesions such as fibroids or polyps, it is poor at differentiating between atrophy or hyperplasia.

4.2 Ultrasound

The role of ultrasound is to detect pathology not detectable at a clinical examination (e.g. endometrial pathology, such as endometial thickness, (hypoplasia, or hyperplasia), small submucous myomas, adenomyosis, polyp, etc. Figure 7.1 shows a sonogram of an atrophic or hypoplastic endometrium. Figure 7.2 shows a sonogram of endometrial hyperplasia. The ultrasound examination is also used to confirm or refute a diagnosis suspected on the basis of abnormal findings at palpation (e.g. uterine intramural or subserous myomas, or adnexal masses). The clinician then needs to decide if an abnormal ultrasound finding is the likely cause of the abnormal bleeding or if it is an incidental finding unrelated to the woman’s symptoms. An ultrasound examination carried out because of abnormal vaginal bleeding should also include examination of the adnexa and the urinary bladder, as abnormal bleeding may be explained by a hormone-producing ovarian tumour or a tumour in the urinary bladder (i.e. if the woman confuses bleeding from the urethra with vaginal bleeding). US can also diagnose rare A-V malformations.

A318621_1_En_7_Fig1_HTML.jpg

Fig. 7.1

Endometrial atrophy. Endometrial atrophy. The endometrial shadow can be seen as a thin feint line

A318621_1_En_7_Fig2_HTML.jpg

Fig. 7.2

Endometrial hyperplasia. Endometrial hyperplasia. The thickened endometrial shadow can be seen between the two calipers

If a polyp, adenomyosis or leiomyoma are found, the treatment is surgical or interventional (uterine artery embolization for unterine fibroids or magnetic resonance guided highly focused ultrasound for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis) and therefore outside of the scope of this chapter. If no abnormalities are found, endometrial biopsy should be considered. The big advantage of ultrasound, is that it can be performed on adolescents with an abdominal probe, thus precluding the necessity for vaginal or speculum examination. Doppler ultrasonography may provide additional information for characterizing endometrial and myometrial abnormalities, particularly arterio-venous malformations.

4.3 Hydrosonography

This technique is also known as saline-contrast sonohysterography, saline infusion sonography (SIS) or sonohysterography. In this technique saline is infused into the uterine cavity during transvaginal scanning. SIS separates the uterine walls and thereby clarifies the presence of focal lesions protruding into the uterine cavity [14]. As long as the cervical canal is not stenotic, SIS is relatively easy to perform. After inserting the catheter into the uterine cavity and the ultrasound probe into the vagina, a few millilitres of saline are injected. Virtually all endometrial pathology grows focally in the uterine cavity [15]. If no focal lesions are present in the uterine cavity, the odds of malignancy decrease 20-fold, and the odds of any endometrial pathology decrease 30-fold [15]. A smooth endometrium at SIS is a strong sign of normality.

As most focal lesions cannot be removed at all, or only be partially removed by blind endometrial sampling, such as pipelle, or dilatation and curettage, focal lesions should be hysteroscopically resected under direct visual control.

4.4 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

MRI is not generally recommended as a first-line procedure for investigating AUB. MRI is a good second line procedure if ultrasound reveals a bulky, polymyomatous uterus, or if adenomyosis is suspected. MRI has the advantage of distinguishing between myomas, sarcomas, and adenomyosis. Therefore, MRI can also optimize treatment strategy regarding the use of major surgery, or minimally invasive procedures. MRI can also provide a diagnostic assessment of the endometrium when the uterine cavity is inaccessible [16].

5 Hysteroscopy

Hysteroscopy has a few unique advantages over other forms of imaging, despite the need for a skilled endoscopic surgeon. Diagnostic hysteroscopy can be performed as an office procedure and permits direct visualization of the endometrial cavity. Therefore, it can be very valuable for diagnosing endometrial focal lesions, atrophy and hyperplasia as well as primary or secondary malformations of the uterine cavity (septum, polyp, residua, caesarean section niche, etc). Hysteroscopy also has the advantage of allowing a targeted biopsy to be taken, particularly in focal lesions which may be missed by blind endometrial sampling techniques. The likelihood of endometrial cancer diagnosis after a negative hysteroscopy result is 0.4–0.5 % [17]. In some settings, especially if uterine pathology is suspected, a diagnostic hysteroscopy can be combined with an operative procedure in the same session if required. The European guidelines [18] suggest that hysteroscopy is a second line procedure when ultrasound suggests a focal lesion, when biopsy is non diagnostic, or as an operative procedure if medical treatment fails after 3–6 months.

6 Biopsy

Histological examination is usually thought to be the gold standard for making a diagnosis of uterine pathology. Endometrial sampling for the diagnosis or exclusion of mostly hormonally induced endometrial changes (hyperplasia or endometrial cancer) is most often performed with a pipelle. The biopsy also may provide information about the hormonal status of the endometrium. However, there is a 0–54 % rate of sampling failure [19]. Another important limitation of pipelle biopsy is that it samples an average of only 4 % of the endometrium with a reported range of 0–12 % [20]. Usually a polyp is an incidental finding during endometrial sampling and most often is not entirely removed by pipelle.

Classically, endometrial sampling was performed by dilatation and curettage (D&C). Pipelle biopsy has replaced D&C, as pipelle biopsy is an office procedure, thus less invasive and less expensive than D&C. In addition, pipelle biopsy is safer, as the general anesthetic usually used in D&C is not required. D&C has been reported to lack the ability to identify uterine focal lesions [21], and blind excision of focal lesions by curettage may be incomplete.

The question arises as to when sampling is indicated. In the adolescent, there is little place for biopsy, unless absolutely necessary and might be considered only in extreme cicumstances.

Goldstein [22] summarised five large prospective studies in women with postmenopausal women. An endometrial thickness of ≤4 mm on transvaginal ultrasound with bleeding was associated with a risk of malignancy of 1 in 917 (3 cancers in 2,752 patients). Goldstein [22] concluded that in postmenopausal bleeding, biopsy is not indicated when the endometrial thickness is ≤4 mm. Furthermore, if biopsy is performed in patients with a thin endometrium, it is most likely that no tissue would be obtained for histology. In a study of 97 consecutive patients with post menopausal bleeding evaluated by endometrial biopsy, only 82 % of the patients with an endometrial thickness ≤5 mm (n = 45) had a successful Pipelle biopsy completed [23], and only 27 % of them produced a sample which was adequate for diagnosis. The results on postmenopausal women can be extrapolated to premenopausal women. However, in women with endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial sampling is indicated [24, 25], as there is a high possibility of malignancy.

Endometrial sonographic thickness as an indicator of the need for biopsy is problematic in premenopausal women with AUB, as endometrial thickness changes throughout the menstrual cycle (from 4 to 8 mm during the proliferative phase, to 8–14 mm during the secretory phase [26]). In our hands, the use of hormonal assessment prior to endometrial sampling has proven very to be clinically important: Determination of blood estradiol, progesterone and beta-hCG levels prior to endometrial sampling can avoid sampling of a pregnant or postovulatory endometrium and allow re-assessment of the ultrasound findings and endometrial thickness in view of the hormonal state of the patient.

7 Principles of Treatment

Treatment has a number of objectives, to lessen or stop the bleeding, and to provide long term relief. AUB due to a structural problem (polyp, adenomyosis, and leiomyoma, etc.) are treated surgically, and therefore outside the scope of this chapter. Medical management of endometrial cancer has been described in Chap. 12. The primary goal of medical therapy should be to stabilize the endometrium with estrogen to provide initial hemostasis, followed by combined estrogen/progestogens for endometrial stability and induction of a menstruation-like withdrawal bleed. This induced bleeding can at first be strong because of a medical “curettage” of a thickened endometrial layer and is usually limited in time, especially if hormonal therapy is continued afterwards. However, this basic plan of action should be modified according to the patients needs, desire for fertility, anemia, endometrial thickness etc. In addition to hormonal therapy, other medical treatment modalities are available such as NSAIDS, tranexamic acid, and receptor modulators etc. Some specific modifications are listed below.

7.1 Adolescent AUB

The presence of irregular and heavy AUB is a relatively common cause of concern among adolescents and their parents, as well as a frequent cause of visits to emergency departments, gynaecologists, and pediatricians [1]. Adolescent patients pose particular diagnostic problems because the characteristics of normal puberty often overlap with signs and symptoms of PCOS. The aims of AUB treatment in adolescents is therefore to stop bleeding, prevent or reverse anemia and achieve adequate cycle control. Anemia can be corrected with iron supplementation, with added folate and vitamin B12 if necessary, but these alone will not address the underlying cause of anemia: bleeding. Bleeding can usually be controlled with combined oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) taken continuously for several months. Alternatively, monophasic OCPs containing 20–30 μg of ethinyl estradiol and a relatively androgenic progestogen such as 0.3 mg of norgestrel or 0.15 mg of levonorgestrel can be used cyclically. If breakthrough bleeding occurs, or heavy menstrual bleeding persists and other causes of AUB have been excluded, the dose can be doubled for a short period of time to two pills per day. Since combined hormonal contraceptives can increase levels of coagulation factors such as factor VIII and von Willebrand factor, OCP’s might have an additional effect in cases of an underlying coagulopathies.

If estrogen is contraindicated due to a history of thrombosis, migraine, hypertension etc., progestogens alone can be used. Examples are: oral medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), or norethisterone (norethindrone acetate, NETA). Oral MPA 10 mg daily or NETA 5 mg daily given for 10–14 days each month generates a secretory endometrium that induces a withdrawal bleed 1–7 days after stopping the medication. However, (NETA) can be aromatised to ethinylestradiol [27]. Kuhnz et al. [28] reported that this conversion resulted in a dose that was equivalent to taking 4–6 μg of ethinyl estradiol for each 1 mg of NETA ingested. The conversion ratio of NETA to EE has been subsequently estimated to be between 0.2 and 0.33 % for different doses [29], Chu et al. [30] concluded that a daily dose of 10–20 mg NETA equates to taking a 20–30 μg ethinyl estradiol COC, Conversion to estrogen and the estrogenic effects are of no relevance when these progestogens are taken in low-dose progestogen-only, or combined oral contraceptive pills [31] but probably explains why high-dose norethisterone and its ester are effective at delaying and regulating menstrual bleeding. There are no similar implications for other progestogens in either low or high doses, since these structural issues do not apply [3234].

It has been reported in other chapters in this book that dydrogesterone binds the progesterone receptor up to 50 % more than progesterone itself. However, dydrogesterone stimulates the progesterone receptor alone. It may therefore be appropriate in patients with a thickened endometrium in whom progesterone only effects are required. However, if there is a thin endometrium, estrogen will also be required to provide hemostasis, in addition to dydrogesterone.

The LNG-IUS or etonogestrel/ethinyl estradiol vaginal ring are other possibilities, but are not usually acceptable in adolescents. Clomiphene citrate has occasionally been used in anovulatory adolescents. Clomiphene is a SERM which blocks the estrogen receptor in the hypothalamus, thus inhibiting the negative feedback. Hence there is up-regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. Subsequently, estrogen levels can rise to the level required to induce LH release. The use of clomiphene has recently been reported again as a possible therapy in anovulatory adolescents [35]. During the use of clomiphene citrate in adolescents the chance of conception and the rare possibilities of side-effects (headaches, vision changes, ovarian hyperstimulation, etc.) should be taken into consideration. Further, studies demonstrated that prolonged use of clomiphene might be associated with ovarian cancer.

7.1.1 Acute Uterine Bleeding

In the case of acute AUB, there is a need to stop the bleeding immediately. Hormonal management is the first line of medical therapy if there are no known or suspected bleeding disorders. Treatment options include oral estrogenic compounds, IV conjugated equine estrogen, combined oralcontraceptives (OCs), and oral progestins. If AUB can result from estrogen breakthrough bleeding then a logical approach is to stop the process by adding estrogens orally or parenterally. This approach usually leads to a very quick cessation of bleeding and after several days without bleeding, combined estrogen and progestagen treatment can be administered until the planned time of the next menstruation.

Intravenous conjugated equine estrogen is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute AUB. A dose of 25 mg can be given intravenously. However, the patient requires cycling by progestogen immediately afterwards. In one randomized controlled trial of 34 women, IV conjugated equine estrogen stopped bleeding in 72 % of participants within 8 h of administration compared with 38 % of participants treated with a placebo [36]. Little data exist regarding the use of IV estrogen in patients with cardiovascular or thromboembolic risk factors.

High doses of oral contraceptive pills as well as MPA have been used with variable success [37]. For COC large doses such as three pills per day may be required with the resulting side-effects of large doses of hormones. However, estrogen only is probably more effective than COC. Progestogens can be used as sole agents in acute AUB. MPA can be given up to 20 mg three times daily for a week or NETA can be given in doses up to 40 mg daily in divided doses until bleeding stops and then the dose can be tapered down [38]. Another treatment regimen for acute AUB is depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate 150 mg given intramuscularly followed by MPA 20 mg given orally thrice daily for 3 days. This treatment stopped bleeding within 5 days in all 48 women in a pilot study. Study participants reported infrequent side effects and high satisfaction.

Monro et al. [37] compared the results of oral contraceptives three times daily for 1 week with MPA administered three times daily for 1 week. The study found that bleeding stopped in 88 % of women who took OCs and 76 % of women who took MPA within a median time of 3 days.

The author uses a regimen of oral synthetic estradiol (Estrofem) 2–4 mg followed by oral MPA 10 mg or micronized progesterone 200 mg nocte. This regimen results in good relief of acute AUB.

7.2 Perimenopausal Bleeding

Perimenopausal patients need to have organic disease excluded before medical therapy is prescribed. As mentioned above, there is a higher incidence of organic disease in this age group. As in the other age groups, anemia may need to be corrected. Perimenopausal women with AUB, may be treated with cyclic progestin therapy, low-dose oral contraceptive pills, the levonorgestrel IUD, or cyclic hormone therapy. Each treatment modality has advantages and disadvantages. The OCP and LNG-IUS provide contraception, in addition to hemostasis. Estrogen therapy, also provides relief from perimenopausal symptoms, such as hot flashes, night sweats, and vaginal atrophy. The choice of therapy often is guided by the patient’s priorities. Endometrial thickness will also give an idea of whether estrogen is required, or whether the patient can be managed on progestogen alone. In a study of 120 perimenopausal women treated by continuous estrogen and cyclic progestin or cyclic progestogen alone [39], 86 % of women in the combined treatment group experienced cyclic menstrual bleeding, and reduced vasomotor symptoms. In addition, 76 % of the women rated their bleeding as normal in amount and duration.

7.2.1 LNG-IUS

The LNG-IUS is particularly useful for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding in women who desire contraception. The LNG-IUS has been shown to be the most effective treatment in reducing menstrual blood loss compared with other medical therapies for chronic AUB and can reduce menstrual blood loss by more than 80 % and even induce hormonal amenorrhea [40]. However, the LNG-IUS takes time to achieve adequate endometrial quiescence. Initially there may be increased bleeding. The LNG-IUS results in greater increases in hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels after 6 months compared with oral MPA from day 16 to 26 of the menstrual cycle [41]. Women also reported higher rates of subjective improvement in their bleeding despite the known initial side effect of irregular bleeding after LNG-IUS insertion. The efficacy of the levonorgestrel IUS was evaluated by Vilos et al. [42] in 56 obese perimenopausal women with AUB. The mean age was 42 years and the mean body mass index was greater than 30. At the 48-month follow-up, the satisfaction rate was 75 %; amenorrhea and hypomenorrhea were noted with longer use. Hence, The LNG-IUS is an excellent long-term treatment modality for heavy menstrual bleeding when contraception is also required.

7.2.2 Endometrial Hyperplasia

Endometrial hyperplasia, whether simple or complex, with or without atypia has malignant potential. Figure 7.2 shows a sonogram of endometrial hyperplasia. If atypia is present, there is a 29 % risk of progression to endometrial cancer [43]. However, in simple hyperplasia, the risk can be as low as 1 %. Therefore treatment should aim at eradicating the condition. In the perimenopausal or post menopausal woman, hysterectomy is probably the best treatment option. However, in younger women, endometrial hyperplasia can be found in anovulatory cycles, polycystic ovary syndrome, or obesity. If fertility is desired, progestogens are the mainstay of treatment. In hyperplasia, there is little need for estrogen as the condition is due to excess stimulation with unopposed estrogen. Therefore, progestogens can be used to convert the endometrium to a secretory pattern. Once endometrial hyperplasia has been diagnosed, it is essential to repeat the biopsy 3–6 months afterwards to confirm that regression has taken place. However, it has been reported that the median length of progestin treatment required for regression can be 9 months. Additionally endometrial hyperplasia is closely related to insulin resistance and metabolic disorder. A low body mass index of <35 kg/m2 has been reported to be associated with a high resolution rate in patients receiving progestogens [44]. There are case reports which show that if there is no response to progestogens, reversal of hyperplasia could be induced with metformin in addition to progestogens [45, 46].

The main progestogens for treating endometrial hyperplasia are megestrol acetate, medroxyprogesterone 17-acetate [MPA], dydrogesterone and the LNG- IUS. However, there is no consensus on dose, treatment, duration, route of administration, or the most effective progestogen [47]. No evidence is available from randomized controlled trials. Hence treatment is somewhat empiric, and administered in a trial and error fashion. The overall response rate has been reported to be approximately 70 %. Moreover, oral progestins are associated with poor compliance and systemic side effects that may limit overall efficacy [48]. Below are some of the advantages and disadvantages of each regimen.

Megestrol has antiestrogenic and anti androgenic effects, which may not be acceptable to the patient, or may decrease compliance. Megestrol acetate also has glucocorticoid effects. Symptoms of Cushing’s syndrome, steroid diabetes, and adrenal insufficiency, have been reported with the use of megestrol acetate (in the medical literature, albeit sporadically) [49].

Medroxy progesterone acetate (MPA) however, is an agonist of the progesterone, androgen, and glucocorticoid receptors [50]. Hence there may be side effects of acne and hirsutism in some patients. MPA has glucocorticoid properties, and as a result can cause Cushing’s syndrome, steroid diabetes, and adrenal insufficiency. Mesci-Haftac et al. [51] assessed 69 patients with simple hyperplasia, who received MPA. Hyperplasia persisted in 19.7 %. The regression rate to benign findings was 77.1 %. Atypia and progression to complex hyperplsia occurred in 3.2 % of the patients.

Dydrogesterone has been available for over 40 years, consequently, the reports of this progestin go back a long time. In 1988, Meden-Vrtovec and Hren-Bozic [52] reported on 50 patients with cystic glandular hyperplasia who were treated with dydrogesterone for six cycles in a dose of 20–30 mg. Repeat curettage showed persistence of the hyperplasia in 5 of 18 patients (28 %).

Micronized progesterone was introduced in order to provide a bio-identical form of progesterone. Due to metabolism in the liver, it is often administered vaginally, allowing it to bypass the liver, and have an increased local concentration in the endometrium. Tasci et al. [53] compared sixty premenopausal women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia in a prospective controlled study. Group I included 30 patients who received lynestrenol in a dose of 15 mg per day while Group II included 30 patients who received micronised progesterone 200 mg per day for 12 days per cycle for 3 months. After 3 months of treatment no patient in either group showed progression of the hyperplasia. In the lynestrenol group, the rate of resolution was higher than in the micronized progesterone group (p = 0.045). Lynestrenol was more effective in inducing resolution in patients more than 45 years (p = 0.036). The authors concluded that lynestrenol ensures better endometrial control than micronized progesterone at the above doses in simple hyperplasia without atypia.

The Levonorgestrel Intrauterine device has also been used to treat endometrial hyperplasia. The LNG-IUS has been compared to other progestogens: Dydrogesterone, NETA and MPA. El Behery et al. [54], assessed the results of 138 women aged between 30 and 50 years with AUB and hyperplasia who were randomized to receive either LNG-IUS or dydrogesterone for 6 months. The outcome measures were regression of hyperplasia, and side effects or recurrence during the follow-up period. After 6 months of treatment, regression of hyperplasia occurred in 96 % of women in the LNG-IUS group versus 80 % of women in the dydrogesterone group (P < 0.001). Intermenstrual spotting and amenorrhea were more common in the LNG-IUS group (p = 0.01 and 0.0001, respectively). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the LNG-IUS group (P = 0.0001). Hysterectomy rates were lower in the LNG-IUS group than in the dydrogesterone group (p = 0.001). The recurrence rate was 0 % in the LNG-IUD group compared to 12.5 % in the dydrogesterone group. Gallos et al. [55] reported similar results.

The LNG-IUS has also been compared to NETA [56]. One hundred and twenty-nine perimenopausal women with non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia were assessed in a randomized controlled trial. Patients received either the LNG-IUS or NETA for 3 weeks per cycle for 3–6 months. A significantly higher regression rate was noted in the LNG-IUS group than in the NETA group (79.7 % vs. 60.7 %, RR, 1.31 after 6 months). However, no significant difference was found regarding the median time to regression (3 months). The hysterectomy rate during the follow-up period was significantly higher in the NETA group (57.4 % vs.22 %, P < 0.001).

In a prospective RCT [57] comprising 90 premenopausal women with a histological diagnosis of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, patients were randomly allocated to three groups of 30 patients. One group received MPA, 10 mg per day. The second group received NETA, 15 mg per day for 10 days per cycle. The third group had a LNG-IUS inserted. Patients were reevaluated after 3 months of treatment. Patients with regression and persistence were offered the same medication they were using for another 3 months. Patients in the LNG-IUS group showed the highest resolution rate (66.67 %). Patients in the MPA and NETA groups had a resolution rate of 36.66 and 40 %, respectively. The patients with a LNG-IUS showed a regression rate of 33.3 %, whereas patients receiving MPA and NET showed a regression (and persistence) rate of 60 and 56.67 %, respectively There was a statistically significant difference between the three groups regarding the proportion of patients requiring further treatment for another 3 months (χ 2 = 6.501; P = .0387) in favour of the LNG-IUS.

7.3 Receptor Modulators

Receptor modulators have been used in preliminary trials and have shown promising results. The selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), ormeloxifene has an anti-estrogenic effect, which retards endometrial maturation. In a randomized study, Ravibabu et al. [58], reported that ormeloxifene decreases blood loss by 90 % and that the reduction was statistically significant (P < 0.001). There was also significant decrease in the mean endometrial thickness (P < 0.001) after treatment with ormeloxifene when compared to mean baseline value. There was significant improvement, 84 % of patients had relief from dysmenorrhoea (P < 0.001), but anti-estrogenic side effects such as hot flashes and vaginal dryness are a cause for concern.

Mifepristone (Ru486), is a selective progesterone receptor modulator (SPRM). Mifepristone induces amenorrhea whilst maintaining endogenous estrogen secretion. Amenorrhea is caused by complete binding of the progesterone receptor, causing atrophy of spiral arteries and hence, anovulatory amenorrhea [59].

7.4 NSAIDS

A certain amount of relief may be obtained from non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). NSAIDs inhibit the enzyme cyclooxygenase, thereby reducing the raised PG levels which are found in women with heavy menstrual bleeding. A recent Cochrane review [60] showed that NSAIDs (mefenamic acid, naproxen, ibuprofen, flurbiprofen, meclofenamic acid, diclofenlac, indomethacin, and acetylsalicylic acid) are more effective than placebo in reducing menstrual blood loss in women with regular menstrual cycles, but they less effective than tranexamic acid, danazol, or the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS).

7.5 Antifibrinolytic Drugs

Tranexamic acid is a lysine analogue that allows the formation of stable blood clots by preventing fibrin filament breakdown without influencing coagulation in healthy blood vessels (NICE). Data from controlled clinical trials indicate reduced bleeding in AUB by 30–55 % [61, 62]. However, there are side effects including headache, nausea and vomiting. Tranexamic acid is the only nonhormonal, noncontraceptive agent approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of HMB. Concerns have been raised about the potential for thromboses during tranexamic acid treatment. However, population-based data do not indicate an increased risk of thromboses [63]. Tranexamic acid is most often used for women in their reproductive years to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding. One potential benefit is that tranexamic acid is only used during menstruation rather than continuously or for the majority of the menstrual cycle.

References

1.

Spencer CP, Whitehead MI. Endometrial assessment re-visited. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106:623–32.CrossRefPubMed

2.

Lockwood CJ. Mechanisms of normal and abnormal endometrial bleeding. Menopause. 2011;18(4):408–11.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

3.

Krikun G, Schatz F, Lockwood CJ. Endometrial angiogenesis: from physiology to pathology. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1034:27–35.CrossRefPubMed

4.

Schatz F, Krikun G, Caze R, Rahman M, Lockwood CJ. Progestin-regulated expression of tissue factor in decidual cells: implications in endometrial hemostasis, menstruation and angiogenesis. Steroids. 2003;68:849–60.CrossRefPubMed

5.

Lockwood CJ, Nemerson Y, Guller S, Krikun G, Alvarez M, Hausknecht V, Gurpide E, Schatz F. Progestational regulation of human endometrial stromal cell tissue factor expression during decidualization. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76:231–6.PubMed

6.

Lockwood CJ, Murk W, Kayisli UA, Buchwalder LF, Huang ST, Funai EF, Krikun G, Schatz F. Progestin and thrombin regulate tissue factor expression in human term decidual cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:2164–70.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

7.

Zini JM, Murray SC, Graham CH, Lala PK, Karikó K, Barnathan ES, Mazar A, Henkin J, Cines DB, McCrae KR. Characterization of urokinase receptor expression by human placental trophoblasts. Blood. 1992;79:2917–29.PubMed

8.

Papp C, Schatz F, Krikun G, Hausknecht V, Lockwood CJ. Biological mechanisms underlying the clinical effects of mifepristone (RU 486) on the endometrium. Early Pregnancy. 2000;4:230–9.PubMed

9.

Critchley HO, Jones RL, Lea RG, Drudy TA, Kelly RW, Williams AR, Baird DT. Role of inflammatory mediators in human endometrium during progesterone withdrawal and early pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:240–8.PubMed

10.

Baird DT, Cameron ST, Critchley HO, et al. Prostaglandins and menstruation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;70(1):15–7.CrossRefPubMed

11.

Critchley HOD, Kelly RW, Brenner RM, et al. The endocrinology of menstruation – a role for the immune system. Clin Endocrinol. 2001;55:701–10.CrossRef

12.

Dilley A, Drews C, Miller C, Lally C, Austin H, Ramaswamy D, Lurye D, Evatt B. von Willebrand disease and other inherited bleeding disorders in women with diagnosed menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:630–6.CrossRefPubMed

13.

James A, Matchar DB, Myers ER. Testing for von Willebrand disease in women with menorrhagia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:381–8.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Parsons AK, Lense JJ. Sonohysterography for endometrial abnormalities: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound. 1993;21:87–95.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Epstein E, Ramirez A, Skoog L, et al. Transvaginal sonography, saline contrast sonohysterography and hysteroscopy for the investigation of women with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrium >5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;18:157–62.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis, mapping, and measurement of uterine myomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:409–15.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Clark TJ, Voit D, Gupta JK, Hyde C, Song F, Khan KS. Accuracy of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and hyperplasia: a systematic quantitative review. JAMA. 2002;288:1610–21.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Marret H, Fauconnier A, Chabbert-Buffet N, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on menorrhagia: management of abnormal uterine bleeding before menopause. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;152:133–7.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Dijkhuizen FP, De Vries LD, Mol BW, Brolmann HA, Peters HM, Moret E, et al. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and saline infusion sonography for the detection of intracavitary abnormalities in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:372–6.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Rodriguez GC, Yaqub N, King ME. A comparison of the Pipelle device and the Vabra aspirator as measured by endometrial denudation in hysterectomy specimens: the Pipelle device samples significantly less of the endometrial surface than the Vabra aspirator. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:55–9.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Yarandi F, Izadi-Mood N, Eftekhar Z, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dilatation and curettage for abnormal uterine bleeding. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36:1049–52.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Goldstein SR. The role of transvaginal ultrasound or endometrial biopsy in the evaluation of the menopausal endometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(1):5–11.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Elsandabesee D, Greenwood P. The performance of Pipelle endometrial sampling in a dedicated postmenopausal bleeding clinic. J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:32–4.CrossRef

24.

Kelekci S, Kaya E, Alan M, Alan Y, Bilge U, Mollamahmutoglu L. Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography, and office hysteroscopy in reproductive-aged women with or without abnormal uterine bleeding. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:682–6.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Valenzano MM, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Fortunato T, Costantini S, Ragni N. The value of sonohysterography in detecting intracavitary benign abnormalities. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;272:265–8.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Goldstein SR, Zeltser I, Horan CK, Snyder JR, Schwartz LB. Ultrasonography-based triage for perimenopausal patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:102–8.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Klehr-Bathmann I, Kuhl H. Formation of ethinylestradiol in postmenopausal women during continuous treatment with a combination of estradiol, estriol and norethisterone acetate. Maturitas. 1995;21:245–50.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Kuhnz W, Heuner A, Hümpel M, et al. In vivo conversion of norethisterone and norethisterone acetate to ethinyl estradiol in postmenopausal women. Contraception. 1997;56:379–85.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Mansour D. Safer prescribing of therapeutic norethisterone for women at risk of venous thromboembolism. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012;38:148–9.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Chu MC, Zhang X, Gentzschein E, et al. Formation of ethinyl estradiol in women during treatment with norethindrone acetate. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2205–7.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Lidegaard Ø, Nielsen LH, Skovlund CW, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism from use of oral contraceptives containing different progestogens and oestrogen doses: Danish cohort study, 2001-9. BMJ. 2011;343:d6423.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

32.

Kuhl H, Wiegratz I. Can 19-nortestosterone derivatives be aromatized in the liver of adult humans? Are there clinical implications? Climacteric. 2007;10:344–53.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Conard J, Plu-Bureau G, Bahi N, et al. Progestogen only contraception in women at high risk of venous thromboembolism. Contraception. 2004;70:437–41.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Gompel A, Carpentier S, Francès C, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism and oral contraceptives. Lancet. 2002;359:1348–9.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Fulghesu AM, Magnini R, Piccaluga MP, Porru C. Ovulation induction in young girls with menometrorragia: a safe and effective treatment. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014;30(2):117–20.CrossRefPubMed

36.

DeVore GR, Owens O, Kase N. Use of intravenous Premarin in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding – a double-blind randomized control study. Obstet Gynecol. 1982;59:285–91.PubMed

37.

Munro MG, Mainor N, Basu R, Brisinger M, Barreda L. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate and combination oral contraceptives for acute uterine bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:924–9.CrossRefPubMed

38.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no 557: management of acute abnormal uterine bleeding in nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121:891–6.CrossRef

39.

De Francicis P, Cobellis L, Fornaro F, Sepe E, Torella M, Colacurci N. Low-dose hormone therapy in the perimenopause. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;98:138–42.CrossRef

40.

Kaunitz AM, Bissonnette F, Monteiro I, et al. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for heavy menstrual bleeding improves hemoglobin and ferritin levels. Contraception. 2012;86:452–7.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Kaunitz AM, Inki P. The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in heavy menstrual bleeding: a benefit-risk review. Drugs. 2012;72:193–215.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Vilos GA, Marks J, Tureanu V, Abu-Rafea B, Vilos AG. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system is an effective treatment in selected obese women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18:75–80.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Lee NK, et al. Prognostic factors for uterine cancer in reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(3):655–62.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Penner KR, Dorigo O, Aoyama C, Ostrzega N, Balzer BL, Rao J, et al. Predictors of resolution of complex atypical hyperplasia or grade 1 endometrial adenocarcinoma in premenopausal women treated with progestin therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:542–8.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Campagnoli C, Abba C, Ambroggio S, Brucato T, Pasanisi P. Life-style and metformin for the prevention of endometrial pathology in postmenopausal women. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013;29:119–24.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Session DR, Kalli KR, Tummon IS, Damario MA, Dumesic DA. Treatment of atypical endometrial hyperplasia with an insulin-sensitizing agent. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2003;17:405–7.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Tasci Y, Polat OG, Ozdogan S, et al. Comparison of the efficacy of micronized progesterone and lynestrenol in treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;2:1.CrossRef

48.

Gallos ID, Shehmar M, Thangaratinam S, Papapostolou TK, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK. Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(6):547.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Mann M, Koller E, Murgo A, Malozowski S, Bacsanyi J, Leinung M. Glucocorticoidlike activity of megestrol. A summary of Food and Drug Administration experience and a review of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(15):1651–6.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Schindler AE, Campagnoli C, Druckmann R, Huber J, Pasqualini JR, Schweppe KW, Thijssen JH. Classification and pharmacology of progestins. Maturitas. 2008;61(1–2):171–80.CrossRefPubMed

51.

Mesci-Haftaci S, Ankarali H, Yavuzcan A, Caglar M. Endometrial curettage in abnormal uterine bleeding and efficacy of progestins for control in cases of hyperplasia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(8):3737–40.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Meden-Vrtovec H, Hren-Bozic M. Glandular cystic hyperplasia of the endometrium in the perimenopausal years. Acta Eur Fertil. 1988;19(1):49–52.PubMed

53.

Tasci Y, Polat OG, Ozdogan S, Karcaaltincaba D, Seckin L, Erkaya S. Comparison of the efficacy of micronized progesterone and lynestrenol in treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(1):83–6.CrossRefPubMed

54.

El Behery MM, Saleh HS, Ibrahiem MA, Kamal EM, Kassem GA, El Sayed Mohamed M. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device versus dydrogesterone for management of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Reprod Sci. 2014. pii: 1933719114542014. [Epub ahead of print].

55.

Gallos ID, Krishan P, Shehmar M, Ganesan R, Gupta JK. LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(11):2966–71. Doi: 10.1093/humrep/det320. Epub 2013 Aug 23.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Abu Hashim H, Zayed A, Ghayaty E, El Rakhawy M. LNG-IUS treatment of non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia in perimenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. J Gynecol Oncol. 2013;24(2):128–34.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed

57.

Ismail MT, Fahmy DM, Elshmaa NS. Efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus oral progestins in treatment of simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(1):45–50.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Ravibabu K, Palla J, Chintada GS. A study of efficacy of ormeloxifene in the pharmacological management of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(11):2534–6.PubMedCentralPubMed

59.

Bouchard P. Current and future medical treatments for menometrorrhagia during the premenopause. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27 Suppl 1:1120–5.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Lethaby A, Duckitt K, Farquhar C. Non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;1, CD000400.PubMed

61.

Lethaby A, Farquhar C, Cooke I. Antifibrinolytics for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(4). Art. No.: CD000249. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000249.

62.

Lukes AS, Moore KA, Muse KN, Gersten JK, Hecht BR, Edlund M, et al. Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:865–75.CrossRefPubMed

63.

Berntorp E, Follrud C, Lethagen S. No increased risk of venous thrombosis in women taking tranexamic acid. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:714–5.PubMed



If you find an error or have any questions, please email us at admin@doctorlib.org. Thank you!