Principles of Ambulatory Medicine, 7th Edition

Chapter 100

Contraception and Preconception Counseling

Roxanne M. Jamshidi

Contraception provides a woman and her partner with the ability to determine the number and timing of pregnancies. Generally, avoidance of unwanted pregnancies and continued consistent use of a contraceptive method are issues that require ongoing management and consultation rather than an isolated decision.

There are many contraceptive methods. It is important to understand the benefits and limitations of all of them to be able to educate the patient fully about her options. The caregiver should be prepared to deal with women who have varying knowledge and experience about contraception. Table 100.1 lists the most recent data regarding the percentage distribution of use of contraceptive methods by women in the United States (1).

Table 100.2 shows the failure rates of various methods of contraception. Perfect use refers to the annual percentage of unexpected pregnancy among couples who use the method correctly and consistently, whereas typical use

P.1702


reflects common irregularities in use other than voluntary termination of the method. Clearly there is very little difference between the two failure rates with some methods, whereas others show a considerable difference. This information should be used in helping to educate the patient.

TABLE 100.1 Contraceptive Use among U.S. Women 15–44 Years of Age, 2002

Contraceptive

% U.S. Women Age 15–44 Yr in 2002

Female sterilization

16.7

Oral contraceptive

18.9

Male condom

11.1

Male sterilization

5.7

3-month injectable (Depo Provera)

3.3

Withdrawal

2.9

Intrauterine device

1.3

Periodic abstinence or natural family planning

0.9

Diaphragm

0.2

Implant, Lunelle, or patch

0.8

Others methodsa

0.6

aIncludes Today sponge, cervical cap, female condom, and other methods.
From Mosher WD, Gladys MM, Chandra A, et al. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Adv Dat 2004;350:1.

Once it is established that a woman desires fertility regulation, a focused medical history should be obtained, including information about past pregnancies, menstruation, smoking, and medical problems that may affect selection of one method over another. A blood pressure measurement should be made, and if history alone cannot rule out pregnancy, a urine pregnancy test performed. A pelvic examination is not immediately necessary for the initiation or continuation of birth control with the exception of placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or fitting for a diaphragm or cervical cap. Although an annual pelvic examination, breast examination, Pap smear, and screening for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are seen as necessary steps in preventive health care for women of reproductive age, and their deferral should not preclude prescription of a safe contraceptive method and risk an unsafe or unwanted pregnancy (2). After the evaluation, the physician and patient (and, sometimes, her partner) are ready to discuss the various contraceptive methods and develop a satisfactory plan.

Systemic Hormonal Contraception

Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills

Mechanism of Action

The primary contraceptive action of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) is suppression of ovulation by inhibition of gonadotropin-releasing factors in the hypothalamus. This action is primarily mediated by the progestin component. The principal effect of this inhibition appears to be suppression of the surge in activity of luteinizing hormone at midcycle, thereby removing a major stimulus to ovulation. Additionally, COCs make cervical mucus more viscous and therefore less easily traversed by sperm. They also have a direct effect on endometrial development in high doses, making the uterus less receptive to ovum implantation (3).

Preparations and Dosage Schedules

The COC was first introduced for use in the United States in 1960. In the ensuing years, significant changes were made in steroid dosages and some new steroids were introduced. Since 1970, all new COCs introduced in the United States have contained ethinyl estradiol as their estrogen. As their progestin, many COCs in current use contain levonorgestrel or norethindrone. In 1992, however, two new progestins, norgestimate and desogestrel, were introduced in the United States in an effort to decrease unwanted side effects of oral contraception. A more recently introduced progestin, drospirenone, which is derived from 17 α-spirolactone, has both progestogenic and antimineral corticoid activity.

There are three different preparations of oral contraceptive pills:

  • Monophasic—contains the same dosage of estrogen and progestin for 21 days each cycle.
  • Multiphasic—contains one to two levels of estrogen and two to three levels of progestin, which vary through the cycle.
  • Progestin only (mini-pill)—contains progestin only in a steady, continuous dosage.

Table 100.3 lists conditions requiring precautions for the use of COCs. If a woman chooses oral contraception and has no clinical contraindications, then the first choice should be a combination preparation containing between 20 and 35 µg of estrogen. Use of pills containing 50 µg of estrogen should be avoided, and the few women who may need them should be evaluated by an obstetrician-gynecologist if the clinician is not fully familiar with their use. The choice of progestin is less critical, and no progestin is clearly superior to another. The newer progestins have structural modifications that lower their androgenic activity, and therefore may cause less hirsutism, acne, and weight gain, as well as a more favorable lipid profile. Because of the potassium-sparing effects of drospirenone, caution should be used for women at risk for hyperkalemia.

To suppress ovulation and yet allow periodic bleeding, the combination tablet is taken every day for 3 weeks. COCs are generally packaged in 21-day or 28-day cycles.

P.1703


The 28-day pack is designed to improve patient compliance by providing seven placebo pills at the end of the pack. An exception to this is a combination pill that adds a small dose of estrogen to the pills taken on the last 5 days, instead of using inert pills, to prevent the estrogen withdrawal headache experienced by some women. An extended regimen package that contains 84 days of active hormone followed by 7 days of placebo (Seasonale) is also available. The drop in hormone level after 21 (or 84) days produces withdrawal bleeding, just as it does in the normal menstrual cycle. Women typically have their menses 2 to 3 days after finishing their active pills.

TABLE 100.2 Summary of Methods of Contraception, Their Mechanisms of Action, Failure Rates, and Major Adverse Effects

Method

Mechanism of Action

Failure Rate %a

Some Adverse Effects

Typical Use

Perfect Use

No method

85

85

Spermicide alone

Inactivation of sperm

29

18

Irritation can occur

Withdrawal

27

4

Periodic abstinence

Avoidance of coitus during presumed fertile days

25

1–9

Diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide

Mechanical barrier to sperm; inactivation of sperm

16–32

6–26

Increased risk of urinary tract or vaginal infection

Condom

Mechanical barrier to sperm

Allergic reactions

Male

15

2

Female

21

5

Oral contraceptives

Combined

Suppression of ovulation,

8

0.3

Estrogen-related risk of

changes in cervical mucus and endometrium

thromboembolism, stroke; myocardial infarction in older smokers; hypertension; hyperkalemia with drospirenone

Progestin only

Changes in cervical mucus and endometrium, possibly suppression of ovulation

8

0.3

Irregular, unpredictable bleeding in some

Ortho-Evra Patch

Suppression of ovulation, changes in cervical mucus and endometrium

8

0.3

Estrogen-related risk of thromboembolism, stroke; myocardial infarction in older smokers; hypertension

Intrauterine device

Inhibition of sperm migration, fertilization, or ovum transport

Pelvic inflammatory disease; uterine perforation; increase in menstrual blood loss with copper

Levonorgestrel

0.1

0.1

Copper T 380A

0.8

0.6

Medroxyprogesterone (Depo-Provera)

Changes in cervical mucus and endometrium, suppression of ovulation

3

0.3

Menstrual irregularities; headache; weight gain

Levonorgestrel subdermal implants (Norplant)

Same as medroxyprogesterone acetate

0.05

0.05

Menstrual irregularities; headache; weight gain

Sterilization

Vasectomy

Vas deferens occlusion

0.15

0.10

Surgical procedure

Tubal ligation

Fallopian tube occlusion

0.5

0.5

Surgical procedure

aPercentage of accidental pregnancy during first year of use among women in the United States. Perfect use refers to clinical trial data with highly motivated patients; typical use refers to usual clinical experience (see text).
Adapted from Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the Unite States. Contraception 2004;70:89.

Traditional initiation of COC use has the woman start the medication by the fifth day of her cycle, counting the first day of menstrual bleeding as day 1. More common practice is to start on the first Sunday after the onset of a

P.1704


menstrual period. This latter practice allows the packaging of the tablets to provide a minicalendar, which minimizes missing a dose. The tablets are arranged in circles or rows, making it easier to use them regularly. Another method of initiation that may improve compliance is “quick start,” which has the woman take the first pill at the time of COC prescription (e.g., in the clinic) (4).

TABLE 100.3 Conditions Requiring Precautions for the Use of Oral Contraceptives

Known or suspected pregnancy
Breast-feeding mother (first 6 mo)
Non–breast-feeding mother (first 3 wk)
Active liver disease (viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, liver tumor)
Smoker and age 35 yr or older
Ischemic heart disease
Cerebral vascular or coronary artery disease (current or remote)
Inadequately controlled hypertension (greater than 140/90 mm Hg)
Diabetes with vascular lesions
History of thromboembolic disease, or known thrombogenic mutations (current or remote)
Migraine headaches with focal neurologic symptoms
Known or suspected carcinoma of the breast
Known or suspected estrogen-dependent neoplasia
Major surgery with prolonged bed rest

From World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 3rd Edition. Geneva: WHO, 2004.

Postpartum women choosing a COC should wait 3 weeks because of the theoretical increased risk of thromboembolism after pregnancy, but no longer than 4 to 6 weeks, at which time ovulation typically resumes. For women who are breast-feeding, COCs are usually avoided because the estrogen may decrease the quantity of breast milk. Women who have had a spontaneous or therapeutic abortion may start taking the drug immediately after the event.

Noncontraceptive Benefits

In the past few years, COCs have been found to be associated with a significant number of beneficial side effects. These include decreased risks for benign breast tumors, functional ovarian cysts, acne vulgaris, dysmenorrhea, anemia, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), endometrial carcinoma, and carcinoma of the ovary. Recognition of the noncontraceptive benefits of COCs helps place them in a much more positive perspective for women and, indeed, puts the risk–benefit ratio of COCs in a more proper perspective.

Limitations

Thromboembolic Disease

In the late 1960s, epidemiologic studies conducted in Great Britain and the United States showed an increased risk of thromboembolic disorders and myocardial infarction (MI) among COC users. It was quickly determined that the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and other vascular accidents was related to the dosage of estrogen, the woman's age, and whether she was a smoker or nonsmoker (5,6). Decreasing the estrogen dosage in the COCs from 80 to 50 µg achieved a reduction of approximately 30% in the incidence of thromboembolic disease. A further reduction from 50 µg into the range of 30 to 35 µg further decreased the risk of venous thrombosis and other serious vascular complications.

The risk of thromboembolic disease must be kept in perspective. The general risk of thromboembolism in a nonpregnant woman of reproductive age is about 5 to 10 per 100,000. For women taking COC preparations the risk is about 15 to 40 per 100,000. However, for a woman who is pregnant the risk is 60 per 100,000 (7). The increased risk of VTE is highest in the first year of COC use and declines thereafter (8).

Approximately 10 million women in the United States use COCs. Cardiovascular problems, heart attack, stroke, VTE, and pulmonary emboli are the main causes of serious morbidity and death associated with COC use (9,10). Therefore, women with a history of thromboembolism, stroke, or ischemic heart disease should not use COCs. Women who are older than 35 years of age and smoke should not use COCs because of the risk of cardiovascular disease. Smokers who are younger than 35 years of age are not prohibited from using COCs if it is the best method for them; they should, of course, be encouraged to quit smoking (11).

The risk of VTE associated with inherited thrombophilias is further increased with COC use. Women with the factor V Leiden mutation, the most common thrombophilia, who use COCs experience a risk of VTE 30 times higher than non-COC users who are not carriers of this mutation (12). Universal screening for thrombophilias among women who may start COCs is not, however, cost effective. Currently, screening for these mutations prior to initiating COCs is recommended only for women having a personal or family history of thrombosis (13) (see Chapter 57).

The procoagulant changes induced by COCs do not substantially resolve until 6 or more weeks after COC discontinuation (14). For women undergoing major surgery, the risks associated with continuing COCs until surgery must be balanced against the risks of an unintended pregnancy if COCs are stopped 1 month or more before major surgery (15). Heparin prophylaxis should be considered for current COC users having major surgical procedures. COCs need not be discontinued before minor surgery (16).

Hypertension

With the older high-dose COCs, the risk of developing high blood pressure was approximately 7%. Clinical trials

P.1705


have shown that low-dose COCs (20 to 35 µg of estrogen) are responsible for only small changes in blood pressure. Therefore, if a COC user develops hypertension, the hypertension should be evaluated and not ascribed to contraceptive use. Women with pre-existing mild hypertension and those who develop mild hypertension while taking COCs and are younger than the age of 35 may safely use COCs if their blood pressure is monitored and controlled. Severe hypertension or hypertension with end-organ vascular disease is a contraindication to the use of COCs (11).

Neoplasia

After almost 35 years of contraceptive use, the data concerning the relationship between COC use and neoplasia are mostly reassuring. There is a relationship between the long-term use of COCs and the development of benign hepatic neoplasia (17). These lesions are rare, and although the increased relative risk in long-term users is high, the absolute incidence is very low. Long-term use of COCs has been associated with a significantly decreased incidence of endometrial and ovarian cancer (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). A meta-analysis of 20 studies examining the risk of ovarian cancer reported a 10% to 12% decreased risk with 1 year of COC use, and a 50% decreased risk after 5 years of COC use (19). The longer COCs are used, the more they appear to protect from ovarian cancer (20). This protective effect of COCs appears to extend to women at risk for hereditary ovarian cancer, such as those associated with mutations in the breast cancer gene 1 (BRCA 1) and breast cancer gene 2 (BRCA 2) (21). Women who use COCs at least 12 months have a decreased relative risk (RR = 0.6) of developing endometrial cancer compared to never users (22). This risk of endometrial cancer is significantly decreased with increasing duration of OC use, and persists even 20 years after discontinuation (23).

The data are inconclusive for malignant melanoma and cervical neoplasia. With regard to the development of cervical neoplasia, several studies show a slightly increased risk directly related to length of COC use (24, 25, 26). However, because the human papilloma virus (HPV) has been shown to be the main causative agent in cervical cancer, COC use most likely acts as a cofactor in the development of the disease (27).

Similarly, data regarding breast cancer and COC use are conflicting and no conclusions are currently possible (28). Although some data suggest that COCs may advance premenopausal breast cancer, this is a rare time for its occurrence. A pooled analysis from 54 studies shows a small increase in the RR (1.24) of localized breast cancer associated with current COC use and with COC use within 1 to 4 years (RR = 1.16) compared to controls. This risk declines soon after stopping use and disappears within 10 years. Additionally, the breast cancers diagnosed in COC users were significantly less advanced than those in women who never used COCs (29). The incidence of benign breast tumors and fibrocystic disease is reduced by the administration of high-progestin-dose COC hormones. Data on the newer, low-dose progestin contraceptive pills are inconclusive (30).

Altered Metabolism of Glucose or Lipids

With the COCs that contain more than 50 µg of estrogen, abnormal glucose tolerance tests can be seen after 3 months of use. However, this reduction in glucose tolerance is not seen with the low-dose preparations. Also, the new triphasic and low-dose forms do not appear to alter the lipid profile even in long-term users, whereas the high-dose preparations (more than 50 µg of estrogen) do adversely affect the lipid profile (31,32).

Gallbladder Disease

The incidence of symptomatic gallbladder disease may increase up to twofold within the first 1 to 2 years of OC use. An estrogen-associated increase in the concentration of cholesterol in the bile has been demonstrated in women taking COCs and may be the pathogenetic mechanism.

Headaches

Migraine headaches have been reported to worsen, improve, or not change in women taking COCs. Typically, if migraines do occur during COC use, it is during the hormone-free interval. The development or worsening of severe recurrent headaches is a reason to recommend another contraceptive method. Women with a history of migraines associated with auras, or with migraines and comorbid conditions, should avoid the use of COCs because of the increased risk of ischemic stroke (33).

Birth Defects

It is unlikely that hormonal ingestion during the first 3 months of pregnancy results in the subsequent development of birth defects. Although initial epidemiologic studies done in the 1960s and early 1970s seemed to favor an association with some cardiovascular and limb defects, more recent studies tend to refute this association. There is no evidence that prior use of contraceptives has any effect on the development of any birth defect. Establishing a pregnancy within one to two cycles after discontinuation of COCs is not associated with a higher incidence of birth defects (34,35), so no period of protection with another contraceptive method is needed when pregnancy is desired.

Other Side Effects

In general, minor side effects occur early in the course of taking COCs and may be transient. Thorough education by

P.1706


the physician increases the likelihood that the woman will tolerate these effects and continue taking the medication.

Alopecia

Alopecia is a rarely reported side effect (see Chapter 115). Most often it is transient; but if hair loss for longer than 3 months is reported, the drug should be discontinued and the woman should use some other form of contra-ception.

Nausea

Nausea occurs in approximately 5% of women, typically resolves within 3 months after initiation of COC use, and almost always can be eliminated by taking the contraceptive at bedtime.

Fatigue

Increased fatigability is occasionally described by COC users, but usually it is of short duration.

Change in Menstrual Flow

The most typical pattern is a reduction in the amount and duration of menstrual flow, which often is a welcomed effect. Because COCs cause the development of only a thin endometrium, amenorrhea can occur in 5% to 10% of cycles while on COCs. When this occurs and the woman has taken the OC regularly (so that pregnancy is not likely), she can be advised to continue the pills for another cycle. If she is again amenorrheic, a pregnancy test (discussed under Diagnosing Pregnancy) should be done. If pregnancy is ruled out, she can either select another contraceptive method, change the COC preparation to one containing more estrogen, or be reassured that if she continues taking the method correctly she will remain amenorrheic.

Breakthrough Bleeding

Breakthrough bleeding is the most common side effect of COCs, and is most likely during the first three cycles after initiation. It is of no concern as long as the woman has not missed a dose. Failure to take daily doses increases the chance of breakthrough bleeding, particularly in the early part of the cycle. If breakthrough bleeding continues for several cycles, referral to a gynecologist is indicated to rule out an organic cause and to consider use of a higher dosage of estrogen or other change in formulation.

Weight Gain

Although a small amount of weight gain (sometimes associated with fluid retention) is possible with COC use, a systematic review of the available data excludes a large effect of oral contraceptive use on body weight (36).

Vaginitis

It has been difficult to document a close relationship between COCs and vaginitis. The hormones do alter the vaginal milieu, but vaginitis develops in only a small proportion of women. Standard diagnostic methods and subsequent therapy (see Chapter 102) allows most women to continue to use the COC.

Skin Changes

Some women, especially dark-skinned ones, note chloasma (yellowish-brown discoloration of the skin) and a change in hair texture. Chloasma is unlikely to resolve with continued administration of the COC and is therefore a reason to discontinue it if the cosmetic effect is un-acceptable.

Emotional Changes

Typically, COCs improve depression and premenstrual irritability. In some women, however, the progestin agent can cause or exacerbate depression. Women who have a history of depression should be monitored especially carefully for recurrence or exacerbation of this problem. If depression develops or worsens and is thought to be caused by the COC, the medication should be discontinued.

Effects on Laboratory Tests

COCs can alter the results of a number of laboratory tests (37). The alterations reflect physiologic changes in most instances but rarely signify clinically significant disease.

Drug Interactions

COCs may alter the effectiveness of a number of other drugs; conversely, a number of other drugs may alter the effectiveness of COCs. Generally, concomitant use of antibiotics with the exception of rifampin does not decrease COC effectiveness. However, individual women have been reported to have significant decreases in plasma concentrations of ethinyl estradiol when taking certain other antibiotics (e.g., tetracycline, penicillin derivatives, cephalosporins), and for this reason, women should be informed of this small risk (38). Caregivers should investigate the possibility of drug interaction before prescribing any other medication to a woman using a COC preparation. Table 100.4 lists drugs that may interact with COCs.

Instructions

Women should take the pills at the same time each day. If a single pill is missed, she should take the missed pill as soon as she remembers it. If two or more pills have been forgotten, she should take two pills a day until she has caught up and then continue the normal regimen but use a backup method (i.e., condoms) for 1 week.

Followup

A woman taking COCs should see a practitioner once a year for a pelvic examination and a cervical smear for cytology if indicated, but inability to schedule these evaluations should not be a reason to withhold a contraceptive

P.1707


prescription. Screening for STDs (see Chapter 102) may need to be done if the woman is at risk. COCs may be discontinued at any time if pregnancy is desired or another method of contraception is planned. The first few menstrual periods after withdrawal may be heavier than during the time COCs were used. There is no change in fertility after a course of COCs, regardless of duration of use. A pill-free or rest period is not advocated when switching to another method or in anticipation of becoming pregnant.

TABLE 100.4 Selected Drugs That May Interact with Oral Contraceptive Preparations (OCs)

Drugs That May Decrease the Effectiveness of OCs, Resulting in Breakthrough Bleeding, Pregnancy, or Both
Well-established, commonly occurring drug reactions
Anticonvulsants: barbiturates, phenytoin (Dilantin), primidone (Mysoline)
Antimicrobial: rifampin
Reported Instances of Possible Drug Interactions
Antimicrobials
Breakthrough bleeding only: neomycin, nitrofurantoin, phenoxymethylpenicillin (penicillin V)
Breakthrough bleeding and pregnancy: ampicillin, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxypyridazine (Kynex, Midicel)
Others: chlordiazepoxide (Librium), meprobamate, phenacetin (no longer available in the U.S.), and phenylbutazone (Butazolidin, not longer available in the United States)
Drugs Whose Effectiveness May Be Altered by OCs
Anticoagulants: effect may be reduced by simultaneous administration of OCs
Clofibrate (Atromid-S): control of cholesterol and triglyceride levels may be lost when OCs are simultaneously administered
Thyroid hormone in patients without a functioning thyroid gland: mostly a theoretical concern; however, increased dosage of thyroid hormone may be needed
Tricyclic antidepressants: higher dosages of estrogen may inhibit the effect of antidepressants, and tricyclic toxicity may be increased
Caffeine: metabolism of caffeine may be decreased; patients who take large amounts of caffeine (e.g., 4–8 cups of coffee per day) should be cautioned regarding symptoms of caffeinism

Contraceptive Patch

An alternative method of delivering combined hormonal contraception is in the form of a transdermal patch (Ortho Evra). This thin medicated adhesive is applied to the buttocks, abdomen, upper outer arm, or upper torso (excluding the breast area), and delivers 20 µg of ethinyl estradiol and 150 µg of norelgestromin per day (39). The patch is changed weekly for three weeks, followed by a patch-free week for a withdrawal bleed.

The same side effects and cautions that apply to traditional COCs also apply to the contraceptive patch, with the exception of a higher incidence of application site reactions (20.2%), breast symptoms during the first 2 months (18%), and dysmenorrhea (13%) (40). Because the medication in the transdermal patch is in the adhesive itself, excellent attachment is required. Data on patch adhesion show that approximately 4.7% of patches need to be replaced because of either partial or full detachment (40). The efficacy of the patch is comparable to COCs, with a failure rate of less than 1% (40,41). Clinical data indicate that contraceptive efficacy may decrease in women weighing more than 90 kg (198 lb) (42), however, even low-dose COCs may have decreased efficacy among heavy wo-men (43).

Vaginal Ring

The combined contraceptive vaginal ring (Nuva Ring) is another novel method of delivering the same hormones as those used in COCs. The vaginal ring is a flexible transparent copolymer ring that is placed in the vagina continuously for three weeks, and then removed for a week to allow for a withdrawal bleed. The vaginal ring delivers 15 µg of ethinyl estradiol and 120 µg of etonogestrel daily (44). Although the ring is designed to be worn continuously for 3 weeks, it can be removed for up to 3 hours at a time, without decreasing effectiveness. Additionally, serum concentrations of the hormones remain at contraceptive levels through 5 weeks of continuous use if the ring is left in the vagina. The ring does not have to be fitted or placed in a specific location in the vagina, can be worn during intercourse, and is comfortable for both the patient and her partner. In fact, the vaginal ring can be used concomitantly with tampons, spermicide, or antimycotic comedication without adverse effects or decreased efficacy (45,46,47).

Again, as a combined hormonal method of birth control, the same side effects and cautions which apply to traditional COCs also apply to the vaginal ring. Initial trials showed excellent cycle control with a low incidence (fewer than 5% of women) of irregular bleeding when initiating the vaginal ring. Some side effects are unique to the ring, including an approximate 5% incidence in increased vaginal discharge, 5% incidence of vaginitis, and 2% incidence of vaginal discomfort. Overall, however, acceptability for the ring is quite high for both patients and their partners, with over 90% of users recommending the method to others (48).

Progestin-Only Pill

Because the progestin-only pills are associated with decreased effectiveness and increased breakthrough bleeding compared to COCs, they are rarely prescribed. However,

P.1708


progestin-only contraceptive pills offer an option for women who have medical conditions contraindicating estrogen (such as thrombophilia), are intolerant to estrogenic side effects, or who are lactating.

Injectable Contraception

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) (Depo-Provera), a synthetic progestogen that is similar to natural progesterone, has been in use in the United States since 1992. DMPA is administered as an intramuscular injection of 150 mg that provides contraceptive efficacy for at least 14 weeks. Administration every 12 weeks provides a margin of error should the woman fail to return at the exact appointed time. In this dosage, the failure rate is comparable to that of sterilization. DMPA acts by inhibiting ovulation, thickening cervical mucus, and altering the composition of the endometrium secondary to the progestin effects.

The most common side effect associated with DMPA is a disruption in the menstrual pattern. This disruption is unpredictable and can range from prolonged periods of amenorrhea (common) to episodes of heavy bleeding (rare). Approximately 50% of women using DMPA for 1 year develop amenorrhea (49). Other reported side effects include skin changes such as acne, breast tenderness, headache, and psychological effects such as decreased libido, depression, nervousness, and fatigue. Variable effects of DMPA IM on body weight have been reported, ranging from nonsignificant changes, to gains of approximately 3 kg to 4 kg at 1 year. However, the only placebo-controlled prospective trial evaluating this issue showed no relationship between DMPA use and weight changes (50).

DMPA is associated with increased bone resorption and, in some studies, a small but statistically significant decrease in bone density when used for more than 2 years. Although this effect appears to be transient and largely reversible (51), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a “black box” warning regarding the possible effects of DMPA on bone mineral density (52). In contrast to the FDA, the World Health Organization (WHO) does not believe there should be any restrictions on the use of DMPA (53). Nevertheless, patients should be counseled regarding the recommendation for adequate calcium intake, especially among adolescents. Additionally, women who may be planning to try to conceive in the future should be counseled regarding the delay in ovulation of up to 18 months after cessation of DMPA, although most women have return of fertility 6 to 9 months after the time the next injection would have been given.

A new lower dose (104 mg) DMPA formulation that can be given subcutaneously is undergoing clinical trials. This method of administration offers the advantage of potential self-administration.

A monthly injectable contraceptive combining 25 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate and 5 mg of estradiol cypionate was approved by the FDA in 2000, and marketed under the name Lunelle. Its mode of action is similar to that of COCs, as are the precautions for prescribing the method (54). The side effect of irregular bleeding is decreased compared to DMPA, and there is a rapid return to fertility within 2 months after the last injection. Unfortunately, Lunelle was recalled by the manufacturer in October 2002, with no known plan for re-introduction to the U.S. market.

Subdermal Contraceptive

Implantable, subdermal capsules that release progestins for several years provide long-acting, reversible contraception. Implants offer the advantage of extremely high effectiveness without maintenance of the user. Like other progestin contraception, the mechanism of action is through a combination of suppression of ovulation, changes in the cervical mucus that make it impenetrable to sperm, and changes to the endometrium that make it thin and atrophic. Implants offer rapid onset of action, with cervical mucus changes seen within hours of placement (55). In general, implants can be placed during any time of the menstrual cycle, with use of backup contraception for the first week of use only. After removal of implants, former patterns of ovulation and menses return rapidly (56). Former use of implants does not alter subsequent rates of fertility, miscarriage, stillbirth, prematurity, or congenital malformations (57).

Like other progestin methods of birth control, the most common side effect with implants are menstrual changes, occurring in almost three quarters of users in the first year (58). Bleeding patterns often become irregular, with an overall decrease in blood loss. Amenorrhea is not uncommon as well. Less common side effects of implants include headaches, weight gain, acne, and psychiatric or mood changes. Local skin irritation occurs in approximately 5% of implant users, but actual infection or inflammation is much less common (59).

In the United States, no implantable methods of birth control have been available since the six-rod implant (Norplant) was removed from the market in 2001. Containing 216 mg of levonorgestrel in six rods, Norplant was approved for use for 5 years in the United States, but two large studies have shown cumulative 7-year pregnancy rates comparable to surgical sterilization, with some decreased efficacy in women weighing more than 80 kg (60,61). Experience with Norplant has led to improvements in the contraceptive implant system, primarily by decreasing the number of implants from six to one or two. Systems with fewer implants can be inserted and removed faster and more easily. Norplant II (Jadelle) is a two-rod system containing 150 mg of levonorgestrel that is left

P.1709


in place for 3 to 5 years. FDA approval was obtained in 1996; but no plans exist to market this system in the United States. However, pending FDA approval, a new single rod system implant should be available in the United States in 2006. This system, Implanon, contains the progestin etonogestrel, which has less androgenic and more progestational activity then levonorgestrel. The single rod comes in a disposable trocar/inserter, which aids subdermal placement. The duration of use is designed for 3 years. With initial studies showing only one pregnancy in over 70,000 cycles, Implanon has extremely high contraceptive efficacy (62).

Intrauterine Contraceptives

Intrauterine contraceptives are one of the most effective methods of contraception. Pregnancy rates range from 0.14 to 3 per 100 women per year. The first modern IUDs appeared in the early 1960s and were made of a biologically inert plastic. The second-generation copper and progesterone-containing devices have been available since the early 1970s (63,64).

During the late 1970s, serious concerns were raised regarding the safety of all IUDs. Studies showed a strong relationship between IUD use and the development of PID. The Dalkon Shield specifically was removed from the market because of its link to spontaneous septic abortions and PID. The clearly increased risk for infection with this particular product has been attributed to the multifilament tail (the string that hangs into the vagina), which seemed to act as a wick for bacteria. (Other IUDs used a monofilament tail.) Because of the publicity from the Dalkon Shield, distribution of other devices was discontinued by manufacturers because of low sales volume or concern regarding litigation costs. However, the concern regarding an increased risk of infertility from PID associated with modern IUD use appears to be unfounded. Epidemiologic studies in the 1970s tended to overstate the risk of pelvic infection from IUD use, for the following reasons:

  • In most early studies, the control group included women who were using diaphragms and COCs. These modalities are protective against PID.
  • The risks for specific IUDs were not analyzed separately. Dalkon Shield wearers, with substantially higher risk for infection, were included in most analyses.
  • Most studies did not analyze for factors that significantly affect the risk of PID, such as multiple sexual partners and previous history of pelvic infection.
  • Recent epidemiologic studies adjusted the relative risks of tubal infertility by type of IUD used and number of sexual partners. They showed that women who had had only one sexual partner in their lifetime had no significantly increased risk of tubal infertility. However, women who had more than one sexual partner had a three to four times higher risk (65). Also, a case-control study found that tubal infertility in nulliparous women was not linked to a history of IUD use, but rather was associated with the presence of antibodies to chlamydia (66).

Types

Two types of IUDs are available in the United States: progesterone-releasing and copper-bearing. All of the devices have a monofilament string attached, which allows for surveillance and removal (see Followup Care). Return to fertility is rapid for both types of IUD.

The copper IUD (ParaGard T380A), which contains no hormone, has a body of polyethylene wound with copper wire and a copper collar on each of its transverse arms. The copper inhibits sperm motility and capacitation, making them unable to penetrate the ovum. There is no evidence that IUDs work after fertilization as an abortifacient. Currently the ParaGard is approved by the FDA for at least 10 years of continuous use. It has a cumulative 10-year failure rate of 2.1% to 2.8%.

The hormone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive the Mirena intrauterine system, was approved by the FDA in 2001. The Mirena has a small, T-shaped frame with a steroid reservoir that releases levonorgestrel at the rate of 20 µg per day. It is currently approved for 5 years of continuous use and has an overall failure rate of 0.14 per 100 woman-years, comparable to that of sterilization. The levonorgestrel thickens cervical mucus and suppresses endometrial proliferation to inhibit passage of sperm, in addition to altering sperm transport as a result of the presence of the IUD in the uterine cavity. The progestin exerts a predominantly local effect; therefore, plasma concentrations of levonorgestrel are lower for Mirena users than for women using oral pills or implants.

Use and Insertion

If the clinician is not experienced in IUD insertion, the woman should be referred to a gynecologist. Traditionally, the IUD is inserted at the time of menstruation, to assure that the woman is not pregnant. However, as long as the provider can be reasonably certain that the woman is not pregnant, the IUD can be inserted at any time of a menstrual period. Prophylactic antibiotics given at the time of insertion do not provide any benefit (67).

Women typically experience some cramps when the IUD is inserted; these can be limited by the administration of nonsteroidal analgesics before the insertion (e.g., ibuprofen 400 mg). If significant cramps persist beyond a few hours, this may be an indication that the device is not inserted properly and should be removed.

P.1710

After insertion, the woman should feel the string of the IUD. She repeats this monthly, after each menstrual period, to ensure that the device is in place.

Bleeding Patterns

Copper IUD users typically note increased menstrual bleeding, and some experience cramping, which usually subsides within 3 months. Conversely, levonorgestrel IUD users experience a substantial decrease in their menstrual bleeding and cramping. The average number of bleeding days decreases from 5 in the first month to 1 in the sixth month; between 15% and 20% of women are amenorrheic by the end of the first year of use (68,69). This bleeding pattern has prompted the noncontraceptive use of this method for women with irregular bleeding.

Adverse Effects

The most common adverse effects of the IUD are cramping, abnormal uterine bleeding, and expulsion. Expulsion occurs in approximately 5% of users, and is the most common reason for IUD failure (70). Uterine perforation, a rare complication, is most likely to occur at the time of insertion. Although the risk of PID does not increase with prolonged IUD use, the first 20 days after insertion is associated with a small increased risk of infection, presumably from endometrial contamination at the time of insertion (71). After IUD insertion, the woman must be instructed to report any fever, pelvic pain, or discomfort promptly. Copper IUD users must also report any missed menstrual periods and be evaluated for pregnancy (including ectopic pregnancy); however, this does not hold true for levonorgestrel IUD users.

Followup Care

A followup visit should be scheduled after the patient's next menstrual period to check IUD placement and evaluate for signs of infection. Thereafter, the woman can return to annual well-women visits. The followup is best done by a gynecologist if the clinician is not experienced in examining women with an IUD.

If the IUD strings are not visualized on speculum examination, the first step in evaluation is to perform a pregnancy test. Those users found to be pregnant should be promptly referred to a gynecologist for evaluation. If the woman is not pregnant, a cytobrush can be inserted in the endocervical canal to draw out the strings. If this is not successful, the endocervical canal can be examined using a uterine sound or an endocervical speculum. It the IUD is present in the cervix, it should be removed. If the IUD is not in the cervix, radiography or ultrasonography (US) should be used to localize the IUD.

Generally, the IUD is easily removed by gentle traction on the string. As with other methods, if the woman terminates this form of contraception other than to attempt pregnancy, she will need help in choosing another form of contraception.

Barrier Methods

Diaphragm

The diaphragm is a low-cost patient-dependent contraceptive device. It is a dome-shaped rubber device that is held open by a metallic band or spring. It is filled with a spermicidal cream or jelly before each use and placed in the vagina over the cervix to prevent sperm deposited during ejaculation from reaching the cervical os. As seen in Table 100.2, with typical use the failure rate is high, whereas correct or ideal use results in a lower failure rate, as is true of all barrier methods.

The diaphragm is fitted by the medical provider. The device fits between the posterior fornix and the symphysis. The largest device that is comfortable is the proper one to use. For better effectiveness, the woman should be asked to insert the diaphragm in the office and have the provider check its placement. Manufacturers of diaphragms have excellent booklets that are useful in helping a woman acquire the skill necessary for comfortable use of this form of contraception.

The woman applies spermicidal jelly to the inside of the dome and inserts the diaphragm in the vagina as long as 4 hours before intercourse. She should check for position with her finger and allow the device to remain in place for at least 6 hours after coitus. If repeated intercourse occurs within 6 to 8 hours, additional jelly should be placed in the vagina first, without removal of the diaphragm.

With care a diaphragm should last 2 years. The woman will need a new fitting if she gains or loses significant weight, has a baby, or has pelvic surgery. Some women report discomfort while the diaphragm is in place. This discomfort is most often related to a wrong design or to improper fitting, and re-evaluation usually identifies the problem. A few women develop recurrent cystitis with frequent diaphragm use; this should lead to a discussion of alternative methods of contraception.

Cervical Cap

The latex Prentif cervical cap is about as effective as the diaphragm (in nulliparous women), offers the advantage of being able to be left in place for a longer time (up to 48 hours), and does not need to be used with spermicide. However, the addition of a tablespoon of spermicide placed in the cap prior to insertion can improve efficacy and decrease the incidence of foul-smelling discharge common after 24 hours of use. The cervical cap comes in several sizes, and must be fitted by a health professional to go over the cervix. Proper fitting can be accomplished in approximately 80% of women. Compared to the diaphragm,

P.1711


the Prentif cervical cap is somewhat harder to fit and is more difficult to insert. Two newer cervical caps have been developed and approved by the FDA: the FemCap and Leas Shield. Both are made from silicone rubber, can be left in place for up to 48 hours, and are designed to be used in conjunction with a spermicide. Unlike the other cervical caps and diaphragms, Leas Shield is “one-size-fits-all.”

Condom

The male condom is a latex rubber sheath that is placed over the erect penis. It is the only reversible effective male method of contraception except for coitus interruptus. Condoms, when properly used, are an effective form of contraception, and their failure rate with experienced and strongly motivated couples is as low as 1 or 2 per 100 couple-years of exposure. However, rates during the first year of use or in less motivated couples may be considerably higher. Its effectiveness can be enhanced if it is combined with application of a spermicidal jelly or foam in the vagina. Some condoms are being manufactured in containers with a spermicidal lubricant. The condom, when used properly, provides considerable protection against STDs, including gonorrhea, herpes, chlamydia, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Its only side effects are rare instances of sensitivity to the lubricating material or to latex and skin irritation from friction.

The female condom is a disposable, prelubricated polyurethane sheath between two rings of differing sizes. One ring is placed in the vagina, as with the diaphragm, and the larger ring rests exteriorly on the vulva. Studies show that it is impenetrable to the passage of HIV as well as other common STD agents. Expected pregnancy rates are comparable to those seen with male condom use (72).

Sponge

The Today sponge is made of a soft, disposable polyurethane foam which contains the spermicide nonoxynol-9. After it is moistened with water and inserted in the vagina, it becomes effective immediately and remains effective for the next 24 hours without the need to add spermicidal cream, even with repeated acts of intercourse. It does not require fitting and was available in the United States as an over-the-counter (OTC) product until 1995 when it was taken off the market because of manufacturing problems. The Today sponge is again available in the United States as of 2005.

Vaginal Suppositories, Foam, and Jelly

Vaginal suppositories, foam, and jelly contain a spermicidal material combined with cream, jelly, or foam. The material is inserted in the vagina at least 10 to 15 minutes before intercourse. The spermicidal material is dispersed in the vagina and over the cervix. This creates a barrier around the cervical os to prevent sperm from entering the intrauterine cavity. All of these forms of contraception may be obtained without prescription. They are especially useful when additional protection is desired at midcycle with the condom or to increase the effectiveness of the diaphragm when repeated intercourse occurs. The side effects are minor and are related to sensitivity to the spermicidal material.

Natural Family Planning

The rhythm method or periodic abstinence requires avoidance of intercourse during a calculated fertile period. The human ovum probably is viable for only 12 to 24 hours after ovulation, whereas sperm retain the capability for fertilization for 48 hours to 5 days. It is probable that conception is most likely during a 6-day interval ending on the day of ovulation (73). The development of a method of contraception that avoids intercourse at the fertile time is logical; however, the risk of pregnancy in women who use this method of contraception is high (Table 100.2). Three methods have been developed to calculate the fertile period:

  1. The calendar methodattempts to establish the portion of the cycle when intercourse is safe. The woman keeps a careful record for several months of the duration of each menstrual cycle beginning with the first day of bleeding. She then subtracts 14 days from the end of the cycle, which represent the days of ovulation. Intercourse is avoided during this fertile period. Obviously, the woman's cycles need to be extremely regular and predictable in order for this method to work.
  2. The basal body temperature methodtakes advantage of the slight drop in body temperature that is associated with ovulation and is followed by a rise in temperature of approximately 1°F (0.5°C). The woman takes her temperature each morning beginning at day 3 of the cycle. The couple avoids intercourse from the onset of menses until 3 days after the woman's basal body temperature has risen.
  3. The cervical mucus methodrequires the woman to learn, over a number of cycles, the changes that indicate ovulation. She is taught to examine her cervical mucus for clarity. She learns to identify abdominal discomfort associated with ovulation and to use this information to avoid intercourse when conception is possible. This method requires effort and regular cycles, but it has been used effectively by many women.

Sterilization

In the United States, sterilization is the most popular method of contraception, with elective sterilization higher

P.1712


for women than for men (1). Because sterilization is meant to be permanent and nonreversible, individuals and couples considering sterilization need very careful education so that they understand the nature and risks of the procedure and the availability of other contraceptive options.

Vasectomy

Vasectomy, when properly performed, has a very low failure rate. The complication rate is approximately 4 in 1,000, and, for the most part, complications are minor. They include infection, hematoma, epididymitis, and granuloma formation. Long-term serious side effects have not been reported among the very large numbers of men who have had the procedure performed. There was a transient concern, now known to be unwarranted (74), that antibodies to sperm that develop in some men after vasectomy predispose them to atherosclerosis. Additionally, although there had been a concern that the risk of testicular and prostate cancer may be increased in men after vasectomy, data do not support this association (75,76).

Patient Experience

This procedure is done under local anesthesia in the physician's office or outpatient surgical suite. There is minimal operative discomfort. Postoperatively, mild discomfort is common but is usually controlled with a mild analgesic, such as acetaminophen. Vigorous physical activity and sexual activity are restricted for 5 to 7 days until the wound has healed. Followup visits are necessary so that sperm counts can be performed. Usually, 6 to 12 weeks or approximately 20 ejaculations are required for the ejaculate to become free of sperm. Therefore, use of another contraceptive method is necessary until azoospermia is confirmed.

Tubal Ligation

Despite some sterilization failures with tubal ligation, it remains among the best methods of long-term contraception. Overall failure rates are 0.5% at 1 year and approximately 1.8% at 10 years (77). The major complication rate is approximately 4 per 1,000. The complications are bleeding, infection, and bowel, bladder, or uterine trauma.

Patient Experience

Laparoscopy or minilaparotomy in the United States is usually performed with the use of general anesthesia. Uncomplicated tubal ligation is usually performed as an outpatient procedure and is very well tolerated. Mild abdominal discomfort, when present, usually lasts for only a few days, or rarely for a few weeks. Mild analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen) provide relief. The woman typically is able to return to her usual activities in 48 to 72 hours. Sterilization is immediate, and intercourse is permitted as soon as the wound is no longer painful. More recently, a transcervical sterilization technique (Essure) in which tiny nickel-titanium metal coils with polyethylene fibers are inserted into the fallopian tubes hysteroscopically, has become available. Over the next several months after insertion, subsequent growth of local tissue allows scar formation that causes tubal occlusion. Currently, the FDA recommends that women who undergo the Essure method of sterilization continue an alternate form of birth control for the first 3 months after coil placement, at which time a hysterosalpingogram should be performed to confirm tubal occlusion.

Tubal ligation is ideally performed in the first half of the menstrual cycle before ovulation has occurred. This avoids the possibility of fertilization of an ovum occurring a day or two before the surgical procedure. If the woman is using effective contraception, tubal ligation may be performed at any time.

The existence of a posttubal syndrome, characterized by heavier menstrual bleeding and more pelvic pain than in the unsterilized population, has been questioned. After sterilization, most women notice no significant change in symptoms associated with their menstrual periods.

Emergency Contraception

Emergency contraception describes the use of a contraceptive method after intercourse to prevent pregnancy. This name is preferred to “morning-after pill,” which suggests a very brief window of potential use after unprotected intercourse. Emergency contraception is indicated after intercourse without a method, current method failure (e.g., condom rupture), or rape. Access to emergency contraception can be increased by providing a patient with instructions and a prescription during a routine office visit or by making patients aware of how to access it urgently (1-888-NOT-2-LATE or http://www.not-2-late.com). Emergency contraception should not be used if a pregnancy test is positive.

Insertion of a copper IUD, possible up to 5 days following unprotected intercourse, is the most effective form of emergency contraception, with a pregnancy rate of approximately 0.1 per 100 women. Oral contraceptives are also highly effective as emergency contraceptive measures and are used up to 72 hours following unprotected sex. Progestin-only methods are better tolerated and more effective than combination pills, with pregnancy rates of 1.1% and 3.2%, respectively (78). Emergency contraception is ineffective at disrupting an already established pregnancy.

Method Use

Currently available methods of emergency contraception include COC pills or the copper IUD. There are many

P.1713


possible combinations of oral contraceptives that have been shown to be effective. Plan B, a progestin-only dedicated product contains two tablets of 0.75 mg levonorgestrel. Product labeling instructs that the first dose is taken within 72 hours (earlier administration increases effectiveness), and then repeated (second dose) 12 hours later. However, a large randomized trial shows that a single dose of 1.5 mg is as effective as two separate doses of 0.75 mg (79). Additionally, emergency oral contraception has been shown to have efficacy up to 120 hours after intercourse, although the efficacy is reduced the longer the time delay (79). Neither a pelvic examination nor blood pressure measurement (asymptomatic women) is necessary before providing the method. The IUD can be inserted up to 5 days after unprotected intercourse.

Pregnancy testing is unnecessary before emergency contraception unless there is information to suggest that conception already occurred in a previous cycle. A woman should return for pregnancy testing if she does not get her menses within 3 to 4 weeks after taking emergency contraception. Women given emergency contraception should also receive counseling to help them choose an appropriate method for ongoing contraception.

Contraception in Special Circumstances

During the time leading up to the menopause, a woman's concern regarding unplanned pregnancy is heightened by abnormal menstrual cycles and episodes of amenorrhea. Although fertility declines with age, missing a period is disturbing to a woman in the perimenopause unless a very reliable method of contraception is being used. Some methods are particularly advantageous to women in the perimenopause.

The postpartum woman needs help in getting back on a contraceptive program, and usually her obstetrician has given her advice in this regard. Also, the woman wishing to use an IUD needs to wait for involution of the uterus—which usually occurs 4 to 6 weeks after delivery—and therefore is at risk for pregnancy until the IUD is inserted. The physiology of the female reproductive cycle, important to an understanding of the many contraceptive methods, is discussed in Chapter 101.

Diagnosing Pregnancy

Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a glycoprotein hormone that is produced by the blastocyst and the placenta. Its secretion begins very early and can be detected in the maternal blood as early as 6 days after fertilization. Its concentration in serum approximately doubles every 48 hours during the first 10 weeks of a normal pregnancy. In the past, a number of conditions could give rise to a false positive result, such as the presence of foreign protein or cross-reaction with the luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). The α-subunit for hCG is common to all of these hormones. However, the β-subunit for hCG is unique, and the currently available pregnancy tests that use the monoclonal antibody methodology test only for the β-subunit. A false-positive reaction, even with home pregnancy detection kits, is extremely rare. There are four major types of pregnancy tests, each with its own characteristics; all are very accurate. The Icon, an enzyme-linked immunoassay, is the most commonly used test because of its simplicity, accuracy, and availability. Any clinician who may be asked to diagnose pregnancy should have a rapid pregnancy diagnosing kit in the office. There is no clinical situation in which one of these tests has a distinct advantage over another.

Radioimmunoassay

The radioimmunoassays are performed on serum samples. Tests include Chorion Quant, Beta Tec, and HCG Beta III. Their features are as follows:

  • Accurate (almost 100% accuracy for positive result in normal pregnancy) when used at least 7 days after conception
  • No LH cross-reaction
  • Specific for hCG (detects the β-subunit)
  • Used for assessing abnormal pregnancy (ectopic, molar, threatened abortion)
  • Requires that the specimen be sent to a laboratory, and the typical turnaround time is 1 day

Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay

The enzyme-linked immunoassay tests (Icon, Confidot, Quest) are performed on urine or serum. Their features are as follows:

  • Accurate when used at least 12 days after conception
  • No LH cross-reaction
  • Specific for hCG (detects the β-subunit)
  • Used for routine pregnancy confirmation
  • Easy to use, and results are available in a few minutes

Radioreceptor Assay

The radioreceptor assay pregnancy test (Biocept-G) is performed on serum. It has the following features:

  • Accurate when used at least 14 days after conception
  • LH cross-reaction possible
  • Used for early confirmation of normal pregnancy
  • Specimen usually is sent to a laboratory, and the turnaround time is typically 1 day

P.1714

Immunoassay

The immunoassays (Neocept, Pregnosis) are performed on urine or serum. Their features are as follows:

  • Accurate when used at least 28 days after conception
  • LH cross-reaction possible
  • Used for routine pregnancy confirmation
  • Serum assay usually is sent to a laboratory, but urine assay can be done in the office

The biological half-life of hCG is approximately 1.5 days. The serum hCG result becomes negative approximately 9 to 13 days after spontaneous abortion, if all trophoblastic tissue is expelled (80). The hCG test may remain positive for weeks to months if small foci of functioning trophoblastic tissue remain. This could be seen after incomplete abortion, persistent hydatidiform mole, or choriocarcinoma.

Unplanned Pregnancy

All contraceptive methods are associated with some failures, which may result in an unplanned pregnancy. Women with such a pregnancy are faced with the difficult decision of whether to carry or to terminate the pregnancy. Estimates are that almost 50% of the approximately 4 million births in the United States in 1992 were unplanned.

Currently, about 1.5 million therapeutic abortions are performed each year in the United States. The usual method of early termination of pregnancy in the United States is a surgical suction dilation and curettage performed in an outpatient center, free-standing clinic, or obstetrician's office, usually with the patient under local anesthesia. The antiprogesterone compound, mifepristone, was approved in 2000 for use in conjunction with misoprostol for the medical termination of early pregnancy. The current FDA-approved regimen provides 600 mg of mifepristone orally on day 1, followed on day 3 by 400 µg of misoprostol given orally in the provider's office.

Preconception Care

A variety of medical conditions, occupational situations, and social practices have consequences on early pregnancy. Because organogenesis begins about 17 days after conception, whereas traditional prenatal care may not commence for several weeks thereafter, there is ample reason to provide preconception care in an effort to optimize a woman's medical, social, and emotional readiness for pregnancy.

Preconception care should include a thorough history, a targeted physical examination, focused laboratory investigations, and specified counseling. The couple should be interviewed regarding family and genetic history, with appropriate carrier screening for inheritable conditions such as hemoglobinopathies, Tay-Sachs disease, or cystic fibrosis, among others. Existing medical conditions should be reviewed and medical therapy optimized, especially for patients with diabetes mellitus or hypertension. Women should discontinue, or be offered alternatives to, drugs known to be contraindicated in pregnancy, such as isotretinoin or Coumadin. Infectious disease risks should be assessed (e.g., rubella, hepatitis B, HIV), and, if appropriate, vaccines should be offered for rubella varicella, and hepatitis B. Additionally, screening should be offered for sexually transmitted diseases such as chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis. Nutrition and eating habits should be evaluated. Although a multivitamin may be suggested, megavitamin supplementation should be avoided. Evidence suggests that daily intake of 0.4 mg of folic acid before conception significantly reduces the risk of neural tube defects.

Finally, a review of a couple's social readiness for pregnancy can help them focus on the upcoming responsibilities of pregnancy and childcare. Social habits of smoking and alcohol intake should be curtailed, and providers should take the opportunity to motivate substance abusers to seek counseling. Patients should consider domestic and economic readiness for pregnancy, and they should know their employer's policy regarding leave benefits for complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies (81).

Specific References*

For annotated General References and resources related to this chapter, visit http://www.hopkinsbayview.org/PAMreferences.

  1. Mosher WD, Gladys MM, Chandra A, et al. Use of contraception and use of family planning services in the United States: 1982–2002. Adv Dat 2004;350:1.
  2. Stewart FH, Harper CC, Ellertson CE, et al. Clinical breast and pelvic examination requirements for hormonal contraception: current practice vs evidence. JAMA 2001;285:2232.
  3. Durand JL, Bressler R. Clinical pharmacology of the steroidal oral contraceptives. Adv Intern Med 1979;24:97.
  4. Westhoff C, Kerns J, Morroni C, et al. Quick Start: a novel oral contraceptive initiation method. Contraception 2002;66:141.
  5. Layde PM, McCarthy PS, Lord JAH, Smith CFC. Incidence of arterial disease among oral contraceptive users: Royal College of General Practitioners Oral Contraceptive Study. J R Coll Gen Pract 1983;33:75.
  6. Stadel BV. Oral contraceptives and cardiovascular disease (two parts). N Engl J Med 1981;305:612, 672.
  7. Vandenbroucke JP, Helmerhorst FM, Bloemenkamp KWM, et al. Third-generation oral contraceptive and deep venous thrombosis: from epidemiologic controversy to new insight in coagulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:887.
  8. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular Disease and steroid hormone contraception: Report of a WHO Scientific group. Technical Report Series 877, 1998:i-89.
  9. Hannaford PC, Croft PR, Kay CR. Oral contraception and stroke: evidence from the Royal College of General Practitioners’ Oral Contraception Study. Stroke 1994;25:935.

P.1715

  1. Lowe GDO, Greer IA, Cooke TG, et al. Risk of and prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospital patients. BMJ 1992;305:567.
  2. World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 3rd ed. Geneva: WHO, 2004.
  3. Vandenbroucke JP, Koster T, Briet E, et al. Increased risk of venous thrombosis in oral-contraceptive users who are carriers of factor V Leiden mutation. Lancet 1994;334:1453.
  4. Vandenbroucke JP, van der Meer FJ, Helmerhorst FM, et al. Factor V Leiden: should we screen oral contraceptive users and pregnant women? BMJ 1996;33:1127.
  5. Robinson GE, Burren T, Mackie IJ, et al. Changes in haemostasis after stopping the combined contraceptive pill: implications for major surgery. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 1986;292:526.
  6. Bonnar J. Can more be done in obstetrics and gynecologic practice to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with venous thromboembolism? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:784.
  7. Coagulation and thrombosis with OC use: physiology and clinical relevance. Dialogues in Contraception. Little Falls, NJ: Health Learning Systems, 1996.
  8. Edmondson HA, Henderson B, Benton B. Liver-cell adenomas associated with use of oral contraceptives. N Engl J Med 1976;294:470.
  9. Centers for Disease Control. Cancer and steroid hormone study: oral contraceptive use and ovarian cancer. JAMA 1983;249:1596.
  10. Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, et al. A quantitative assessment of oral contraceptive use and risk of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1992;80:708.
  11. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The reduction in risk of ovarian cancer associated with oral-contraceptive use. N Engl J Med 1987;316:650.
  12. Narod SA, Risch H, Moslehi R, et al. Oral contraceptive use and the risk of hereditary ovarian cancer. Hereditary Ovarian Cancer Clinical Study Group. N Engl J Med 1998;339:424.
  13. Combination oral contraceptive use and the risk of endometrial cancer. The Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study of the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development JAMA 1987;257:796.
  14. Schlesselman JJ. Risk of endometrial cancer in relation to use of combined oral contraceptives: a practitioner's guide to meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1851.
  15. Brinton LA, Huggins GR, Lehman HF, et al. Long term use of oral contraceptives and risk of invasive cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 1986;38:339.
  16. Moreno V, Bosch FX, Munoz N, et al. Effect of oral contraceptives on risk of cervical cancer in women with human papillomavirus infection: the IARC multicentric case-control study. Lancet 2002;359:1093.
  17. Smith JS, Green J, Berrington de Gonzalez A, et al. Cervical cancer and use of hormonal contraceptives: a systematic review. Lancet 2003;361:1159.
  18. Skegg DC. Oral contraceptives, parity, and cervical cancer. Lancet 2002;359:1080.
  19. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Clarke EA, et al. A case-control study of the risk of breast cancer in relation to oral contraceptive use. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:1437.
  20. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53,297 women with breast cancer and 100,239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies. Lancet 1996;347:1713.
  21. Dumeaux V, Alsaker E, Lunde E. Breast cancer and specific types of oral contraceptives: a large Norwegian cohort study. Int J Cancer 2003;105:844.
  22. Krauss RM, Burkman RT. The metabolic impact of oral contraceptives. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167:1177.
  23. Petitti DB, Sidney S, Bernstein A, et al. Stroke in users of low-dose oral contraceptives. N Engl J Med 1996;335:8.
  24. Allais G, DeLorenzo C, Mana O, et al. Oral contraceptives in women with migraines: balancing risks and benefits. Neurol Sci 2004;Suppl 3:S211.
  25. Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Contraceptives and congenital anomalies: ACOG committee opinion no. 124, July 1993. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1993;42:316.
  26. Linn S, Schoenbaum SC, Monson RR, et al. Lack of association between contraceptive usage and congenital malformation of offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1983;147:923.
  27. Galo MF, Grimes DA, Schulz KF, et al. Combination estrogen-progestin contraceptives and body weight: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:359.
  28. Effect of oral contraceptives in laboratory test results. Med Lett Drugs Ther 1979;21:54.
  29. Dickinson BD, Altman RD, Nielsen NH, et al. Drug interactions between oral contraceptives and antibiotics. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:853.
  30. Abrams LS, Skee DM, Natarajan J, et al. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of a contraceptive patch in healthy women participants. Contraception. 2001;64:287.
  31. Audet MC, Moreau M, Koltun WD, et al. Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2001;285:2347.
  32. Smallwood GH, Meador ML, Lenihan JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of a transdermal contraceptive system. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98: 799.
  33. Zieman M, Guillebaud J, Weisberg G, et al. Contraceptive efficacy and cycle control with the Ortho Evra/Evra transdermal system: the analysis of pooled data. Fertil Steril 2002;77:S13.
  34. Holt VL, Cushing-Haugen KL, Daling JR. Body weight and risk of oral contraceptive failure. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:820.
  35. Timmer CJ, Mulders TM. Pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol released from a combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000;39:233.
  36. Verhoeven CH, Dieben TO. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing, and tampon co-usage. Contraception 2004;69:197.
  37. Verhoeven CH, van den Heuvel MW, Mulders TM, et al. The contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing, and antimycotic co-medication. Contraception 2004;69:129.
  38. Haring T, Mulders TM. The combined contraceptive ring NuvaRing and spermicide co-medication. Contraception 2003;67:271.
  39. Dieben TO, Roumen FJ, Apter D. Efficacy, cycle control, and user acceptability of a novel combined contraceptive vaginal ring. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:585.
  40. Belsey EM. Vaginal bleeding patterns among women using one natural and eight hormonal methods of contraception. Contraception 1988;38:181.
  41. Pelkman CL, Chow M, Heinbach RA, et al. Short-term effects of a progestational contraceptive drug on food intake, resting energy expenditure, and body weight in young women. Am J Clin Nutr 2001;73:19.
  42. Kaunitz AM. Depo-provera's black box: time to reconsider? Contraception 2005;72:165.
  43. “Black box” warning added to contraceptive injection. FDA Consum 2005;39:3.
  44. WHO statement on hormonal contraception and bone health. WHO Epidemiologic record No. 35, September 2005.
  45. Hall PE. New once a month injectable contraceptives, with particular reference to Cyclofem/Cyclo-provera. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1998;62[Suppl 1]:S43.
  46. Dunson TR, Blumental PD, Alvarez F, et al. Timing of onset of contraceptive effectiveness in Norplant implant users. Part I. Changes in cervical mucus. Fertil Steril 1998;69:258.
  47. Huber J. Pharmacokinetics of Implanon: An integrated analysis. Contraception 1998:58;85S.
  48. Buckshee K, Chatterjee P, Dhall GI, et al. Return of fertility following discontinuation of Norplant-II subdermal implants. ICMR Task Force on Hormonal Contraception. Contraception 1995: 51;237.
  49. Shoupe D, Mishell DR Jr, Bopp BL, et al. The significance of bleeding patterns in Norplant implant users. Obstet Gynecol 1991: 77;256.
  50. Klavon SL, Grubb GS. Insertion site complications during the first year of Norplant use. Contraception 1990: 41;27.
  51. Gu S, Sivin I, Du M, et al. Effectiveness of Norplant implants through seven years: A large-scale study in China. Contraception 1995: 52;99.
  52. Sivin I, Mishell DR, Diaz S, et al. Prolonged effectiveness of Norplant capsule implants: a 7-year study. Contraception 2000: 61;187.
  53. Herjan JT, Bennink HC. Introduction. Presentation of clinical data on Implanon. Contraception 1998: 58;75S.
  54. Population Information Program. Population reports: intrauterine devices. IUDs: a new look. Series B, No. 5. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1988.
  55. Luukkainen T, Toivonen J. Levonorgestrel-releasing IUD as a method of contraception with therapeutic properties. Contraception 1995;52:269.
  56. Burkman RT. The Woman's Health Study: association between intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet Gynecol 1981;57:269.
  57. Hubacher D, Lara-Ricalde R, Taylor DJ, et al. Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women. N Engl J Med 2001;345:561.
  58. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Prophylactic antibiotics for intrauterine device insertion: a metaanalysis of the randomized controlled trials. Contraception 1999;68:57.
  59. Pakarinen PI, Suvisaari J, Luukkainen T, et al. Intracervical and fundal administration of levonorgestrel for contraception: endometrial thickness, patterns of bleeding and persisting ovarian follicles. Fertil Steril 1997;68:59.
  60. Luukkainen T, Allonen H, Haukkamaa M, et al. Effective contraception with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device: 12-month report of a European multicenter study. Contraception 1987;36:169.
  61. Association of Reproductive Health Professionals. New Developments in Intrauterine Contraception. ARHP Clinical Proceedings: September 2004.
  62. Farley TM, Rosenberg MJ, Rowe PJ, et al. Intrauterine devices and pelvic inflammatory disease: an international perspective. Lancet 1992;339:785.
  63. The female condom. Med Lett Drugs Ther 1993; 35:123.
  64. Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1517.

P.1716

  1. Massey FJ Jr, Bernstein GS, O’Fallon WN, et al. Vasectomy and health: results from a large cohort study. JAMA 1984;252:1023.
  2. Moller H, Knudsen LB, Lynge E. Risk of testicular cancer after vasectomy: cohort study of over 73,000 men. BMJ 1994;309:295.
  3. Cox B, Sneyd MJ, Paul C, et al. Vasectomy and risk of prostate cancer. JAMA 2002;287:3110.
  4. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161.
  5. Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Randomised controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception. Lancet 1998;352:428.
  6. von Hertzen H, Piaggio G, Ding J, et al. Low dose mifepristone and two regimens of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception; a WHO multicentre randomized trial. Lancet 2002;360:1803.
  7. Steier JA, Bergsjo P, Myking OL. Human chorionic gonadotropin in maternal plasma after induced abortion, spontaneous abortion, and removed ectopic pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1984;64:391.
  8. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The importance of preconception care in the continuum of women's health care. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 212. Washington, DC: ACOG, September 2005.


If you find an error or have any questions, please email us at admin@doctorlib.org. Thank you!