Hariharan Shankar and Kanishka Rajput
INTRODUCTION
Lazzaro Spallanzani is credited with the initial discovery of ultrasound (US) navigation by bats in 1790. But it was Pierre Curie’s invention of the US-generating piezoelectric crystal that heralded further development of US technology. Following its utilization in medical imaging and guidance, US imaging has seen tremendous progress in its applications and technology in the last 5 decades. Recent years have seen a surge in the use of US for diagnosis and therapeutic interventions in regional anesthesia. US is now making progress in the field of pain medicine because of its utility both in the diagnosis of several nerve, muscle, and joint pathologies and for the ability to see the target and the needle for injection of therapeutic substances (Table 3-1).
TABLE 3-1. Advantages of Ultrasound Guidance
Following its initial use in regional anesthesia, US was quickly adopted for a variety of pain medicine interventions (Table 3-2). Many feasibility studies have been published that attest to its safety and convenience. Studies have also documented elimination of radiation exposure secondary to the use of US imaging for pain medicine interventions.
TABLE 3-2. List of Common Procedures Performed in Pain Medicine Where US Guidance is Utilized
Joint injections
Bursa injections
Trigger point injections
Piriformis injections
Tendon injections
Plantar fasciitis injections
Preprocedural scanning
Caudal epidural
Facet and medial branch injections
Spinal root injections
Stellate ganglion block
Celiac plexus block
Hypogastric plexus block
Ganglion impar
BASIC PHYSICS OF ULTRASOUND
Attenuation
Acoustic Impedance
PRINCIPLES OF ULTRASOUND
Two distinct patterns of reflection give rise to the echoes that make up an US image—specular reflection and scattering.
The ultrasonic beam in modern machines scans the tissues by electronic control such that each element is excited with a time delay, creating a sweeping motion for the image. Beam focusing is achieved by the design of the transducer: lenses placed in the front of the transducer or with the use of phased array.
THE PORTABLE ULTRASOUND MACHINE
The modern portable US machine has made it easy to perform bedside evaluations and interventions. The transducers, the most critical components of the US machine, contain the piezoelectric crystals and are responsible for the transmission and receiving of the US waves. The electronic circuitry of the central processing unit and the image display screen form the other major components. The image system has user interfaces including a computer keyboard to enter information and buttons, knobs, and sliders to control the various operations (Figure 3-1). Some newer machines have touch screen capabilities for adjusting the various parameters.
Figure 3-1. (A) and (B) Key pads and other control knobs of two portable ultrasound machines.
Transducers
Figure 3-2. Transducers used in pain medicine interventions. (A) Curved array transducer producing lower ultrasound frequencies for use in imaging deeper structures. (B) Linear array transducer for use with superficial structures. (C) Phased array transducer for use with deeper structures and abdomen. (D) “Hockey stick” transducer for use with superficial structures and the small foot print facilitates use in narrow areas.
IMAGE OPTIMIZATION FUNCTIONS
Some of the important adjustable functions on the key pad are depth, gain, focus, and zoom. Most portable machines also provide color flow Doppler and power Doppler features with the ability to steer the beam. More recently, touch screen capabilities have also been introduced. Newer machines have dynamic US image optimization technology (Native Tissue Equalization [NTEQ]) that adjusts the gain and other parameters while scanning, thus optimizing in real time. The computer is programmed to perform advanced real-time motion analysis, in addition to accurately detecting and differentiating noise and artifacts from soft tissue.
Depth
Figure 3-3. Setting an optimal depth. (A) The lower portion of this 3-dimensional image does not contribute any useful information to the image and hence the depth setting should have been set as in 3B, and (B) correct depth setting.
Gain
Figure 3-4. Ultrasound images showing different gain settings. (A) High gain showing structures as very bright. (B) Low gain preventing visualization of most of the tissue. (C) Optimal gain setting allowing proper visualization.
Focus
Zoom
Tissue Harmonic Imaging
Doppler Functions
Figure 3-5. Ultrasound image showing cross-sectional view at the level of carotid and internal jugular vein in the neck. The use of color flow Doppler showing flow toward the transducer as red and away from the transducer as blue.
Compound Spatial Imaging
NEEDLE APPROACHES
There are 2 methods of orienting the needle relative to the US beam: the in-plane and out-of-plane approaches (Figure 3-6).
Figure 3-6. Commonly used techniques for needle orientation with regard to the transducer. (A) In plane technique with the needle being advanced from one end of the transducer. (B) Corresponding ultrasound image of in-plane technique. (C) Out-of-plane technique with the needle being introduced from the side of the transducer. (D) The corresponding ultrasound image of the out-of-plane technique showing the needle in cross section as a bright hyperechoic dot.
In-Plane Needle Approach
Out-of-Plane Needle Approach
NEEDLE VISIBILITY
It is critical to the successful performance of an intervention to be able to continuously visualize the needle shaft and tip. This is facilitated by the use of various techniques and devices. Needles used in US guided procedures are available in different sizes and materials. Larger needles may be better visualized.
Troubleshooting if the Needle Is Not Visualized
TABLE 3-3. Technique for Ultrasound Image Optimization During Scanning
Scanning PART
SONOPATHOLOGY
This topic is slowly gathering interest among pain practitioners. Ultrasound may also be used to diagnose abnormal anatomy and fluid collections without extensive training on the part of the sonographer (Figure 3-7). Its use in musculoskeletal injuries is more complex because of the possibility of artifacts based on the angle of the US beam. Nevertheless, the use of portable US diagnostic imaging affords the ability to narrow down the differential diagnosis and facilitates management.
Figure 3-7. Ultrasound image of an intrathecal pump seroma with the pump creating a mirror image of the seroma beneath the pump’s surface.
LIMITATIONS OF ULTRASOUND IMAGING
Figure 3-8. Ultrasound image showing an acoustic shadow created by bone, eg, rib, and loss of visualization through air in lungs. Structures beneath bone cannot be visualized.
COMMON ARTIFACTS
Figure 3-9. Ultrasound image showing enhancement (increased brightness) beneath fluid filled structures, eg, carotid artery and internal jugular vein.
Figure 3-10. Reverberation artifact of the needle over a hyperechoic surface during aspiration.
Figure 3-11. Comet tail artifact created by the pleural lining with the hyperechoic lines gradually diminishing in size.
ERGONOMICS DURING ULTRASOUND IMAGING
Proper attention to body ergonomics of both the patient and the provider avoids injury. The patient should be resting comfortably in a bed. The operator should be seated comfortably on the side of the procedure, and the machine image display should be located on the contralateral side at an eye level to avoid neck strain. The transducer head should be held comfortably in the palm of the nondependent hand, and contact with the skin of the patient with the operator’s hand should be maintained at all times to avoid inadvertent movement of the transducer. The hand should be resting comfortably without extension at the wrist. The needle should be held in the dominant hand.
ADVANCES IN ULTRASONOGRAPHY
Capabilities for three-dimensional (3D) US images are available in most machines. Their utility in pain interventions is yet to be realized. One of the major difficulties is the size of the transducer. Until the recent development of the matrix array transducers, 3D technology rested on mechanically steered transducers. The target area is scanned for a predetermined duration, usually in seconds. The computer then collates all the images and renders the final 3D image (Figure 3-12). This can be further manipulated, trimmed, and edited using manufacturer’s software. Four-dimensional US transducers afford real-time 3D images by incorporating time as the fourth dimension.
Figure 3-12. Ultrasound image displayed during rendering of a 3D image by the computer program.
Mechanical and adjustable needle guides have been developed—with their own advantages and limitations. Despite facilitating needle and transducer alignment for better visualization, they hinder finer adjustments during target localization. Optical needle guides have a laser-sighting apparatus that facilitates in plane needle-beam alignment. However, a portion of the needle shaft has to protrude from the skin surface at all times to allow alignment with the laser. This may require the use of longer needles making manipulation technically challenging. By embedding a piezoelectric crystal at the needle tip, the needle tip may be visualized by stimulating it while using the Doppler function. In order to improve the visibility of needles, echogenic needles have been manufactured with indentations, and polymer encasement with a bubbling agent to facilitate needle visualization or nanoparticles (Figure 3-13). More recently, GPS technology and electromagnetic tracking have been introduced in some machines, by adding a sensor to the needle tip and the hub, to facilitate tracking and trajectory planning. Newer US machines have introduced automatic needle optimization technology to enhance needle visibility (Figure 3-14).
Figure 3-13. Some echogenic needles provide optimal visualization of needle by a coating of nanoparticles. (A) Long axis view of an echogenic needle. (B) Long axis view of an echogenic needle with an echogenic catheter.
Figure 3-14. Needle visualization technology. (A) Image of a phantom with needle in place but not visualized. (B) Same image with needle visualization technology showing the needle clearly.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ULTRASOUND IMAGING GUIDANCE
Recommendations proposed by the American Society of Regional Anesthesia on proper technique of US imaging may be utilized for ultrasound guidance in pain medicine interventions.
SUMMARY
US imaging, with its unique advantages of real-time imaging with clarity and facilitating needle guidance, is proving to be a useful tool in pain medicine without any radiation exposure. A basic understanding of the US technology improves its proper utilization. Adequate knowledge of anatomy, systematic learning of the use of US machine, and regular practice is likely to enhance the practitioner’ skills.
Suggested Reading
Gibbs V, Cole D, Sassano A, eds. Ultrasound Physics and Technology How, Why and When. Elsevier; 2009.
Kremkau FW, ed. Sonography Principles and Instruments. 8th ed. Saunders; 2011.
Narouze SN, ed. Atlas of Ultrasound Guided Procedures in Interventional Pain Management. Springer; 2010.
CHAPTER 4