Michael G. Kaplitt
HISTORY
Facial pain can be caused by a variety of factors, including but not limited to dental pathology, trauma, multiple sclerosis, tumors or other brain lesions, temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders, and myofascial and psychogenic disorders. Although most of these are difficult to treat with either medical or surgical therapy, it is possible to address the underlying insult (tumor removal, resolving dental pathology, resting the TMJ with a bite block) and improve pain by eliminating the offending agent. Trigeminal neuralgia (TM) is a specific type of facial pain syndrome which can usually be clinically distinguished from these other disorders. Proper recognition of the disorder and accurate diagnosis of TN is critical, since there are numerous therapeutic options that are effective for TN but these are of limited or no clear utility for most of the other forms of facial pain. The first known report of symptoms typical of TN came from the famous physician John Locke in 1677.1 The patient described typical severe, sharp, unilateral pain of the face and lower jaw. Interestingly, the patient had teeth removed without relief. This continues to occur to this day, since minor tooth pathology may lead to dental procedures or extractions in a somewhat speculative attempt to treat facial pain that in fact is TN. Nicolas Andre coined the term “tic douloreux,” another term still in use which describes the facial contraction and contortions that often accompany the paroxysmal pain episodes of TN.2 Until early in this century, TN was still believed to involve the facial nerve because of these often seen contractions, but it has long been established that this is simply a reactive muscular contraction during the severe pain episodes.
DIAGNOSIS
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
MEDICAL THERAPY
Medical therapy for TN is based on the belief that the progressive irritation from vascular compression leads to inappropriate firing of the nerve and the resulting spasmodic pain. Therefore, as with other forms of neuropathic pain, the primary medications utilized in TN are anticonvulsants and antidepressants. Carbamazepine is frequently utilized and was recently endorsed in a consensus statement of the American Academy of Neurology as having established efficacy based upon the strength and number of class I and class II studies. This can influence white blood cell counts and therefore requires regular monitoring. Oxcarbazepine is also often utilized and there are several strong clinical studies in support of this treatment as well. Most other anticonvulsant or neuropathic pain medications, baclofen, and antidepressant medications have all been utilized with symptomatic relief in patients, but these have been less rigorously tested in high-quality clinical trials.
Problems With Medical Therapy
SURGICAL THERAPY
Several effective surgical options are available to patients who have inadequate responses to more conservative therapy. Given the high response rates to some of the surgical procedures outlined below, it is not entirely clear if exhausting all medical therapies is appropriate management of patients with typical trigeminal neuralgia. Nonetheless, understandable fears of surgery and potential risks of surgery generally lead patients and caregivers to attempt medical therapy initially, and therefore most patients have at least attempted medical management prior to considering surgical intervention. Most of the current surgical therapies have been available for several decades or more, and therefore there is a large and long experience to help provide patients with confidence regarding the known effectiveness and risks of each procedure. However, with the use of neurostimulation for other types of pain, this is now being explored in mostly off-label or experimental fashions and may also provide a more technologically advanced alternative, particularly in patients who have either atypical syndromes or who have not adequately responded to traditional surgical treatments.
MICROVASCULAR DECOMPRESSION
Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the most invasive of all surgical options for TN, but it also appears to have the best therapeutic outcomes in most series. Roughly 90% of patients are either pain free or have dramatic pain relief soon after surgery, with more than 70% of patients still reporting absence of pain at 5 years in most series. The reason for such strong therapeutic efficacy is likely because MVD is the one procedure which directly addresses the presumptive pathology causing TN.
Figure 76-1. Arterial compression of trigeminal nerve. This is the most common cause of typical trigeminal neuralgia, usually as a result of compression by the superior cerebellar artery. (A) Axial FIESTA image demonstrates compression of the right trigeminal nerve midway between Meckel cave at the base of the skull and the entry zone into the brainstem (root entry zone). (B) Intraoperative image from the same patient demonstrates compression of the trigeminal nerve, with slight deformation of the nerve, by the superior cerebellar artery on the superior (left on the image) side of the nerve. Note the complex of the seventh (facial) and eighth (vestibulocochlear) nerves inferior to the trigeminal nerve (right on the image).
Figure 76-2. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. The superior cerebellar artery is mobilized away from the trigeminal nerve and a Teflon-coated cotton pad is placed between the artery and the nerve to maintain separation and cushion the nerve. Note the deformation of the nerve seen in Figure 76-1B is relieved by this maneuver.
COMPLICATIONS
Several potential complications of surgery can occur and must be considered within the context of the efficacy profile prior to making a decision in favor of MVD.
PERCUTANEOUS LESIONING AT THE GASSERIAN GANGLION
For patients who are poor candidates for MVD based upon risk or age or for those who simply do not wish to undergo an open neurosurgical procedure due to risks or concern, percutaneous lesioning can be a very effective alternative. Also, for patients in pain crises who are not being controlled with more conservative therapies, the relative ease and rapid relief from these procedures can make them very useful in such circumstances. The goal of the RF procedure is to create analgesia without significant anesthesia.
Figure 76-3. Approach for percutaneous radiofrequency lesion of the trigeminal nerve. Fluoroscopy in two planes is generally helpful to localize the foramen ovale and the proper location of the guide needle and lesioning probe. The V3 division of the trigeminal nerve passes through the foramen ovale, but the trajectory allows passage of the lesioning probe into the fibers of the Gasserian ganglion and thereby permits selective lesioning of any trigeminal division. (A) Lateral approach for a V2 lesion demonstrates the wider bore of the guide needle just before the clival line, with the lesioning probe extending roughly 4 mm out from the end of the guide needle and the tip extending just beyond the clival line. (B) Modified submental view demonstrates the guide needles with the attached lesioning probe passing through the center of the left foramen ovale. In this view, the needle appears to be more to the lateral edge of the foramen but the fluoroscopy arm was rotated in this instance to demonstrate the tip, which would be obscured by a straight view down the center.
GLYCEROL INFUSION AND BALLOON COMPRESSION
As an alternative to RF lesioning, glycerol infusion or balloon compression may also be used. Percutaneous needle placement is similar to RF lesioning. For glycerol injection, some practitioners recommend cisternography to confirm proper placement prior to infusion, but others do not believe that this is necessary. Similarly, some reports recommend a small test infusion of glycerol to examine sensory changes which may reflect proper localization. For balloon compression, a balloon catheter is inserted through the needle passed through the foramen ovale and then inflated to compress the ganglion. Compression is usually performed for several minutes (roughly 5 minutes on average), with longer compression times associated with better therapeutic outcomes but also greater incidence of significant sensory loss. A major advantage of these approaches is the absence of need for repeated sedation followed by awake testing, since little or no sensory testing is required to complete these procedures. This usually makes these procedures much shorter than a properly performed RF lesion, and can also be very useful if patients are not very cooperative and have some cognitive impairment or a significant language barrier. Since they are less selective than RF, they can be associated with greater sensory loss in nerve divisions outside of the area of pain and have been reported to have somewhat greater incidences of V1 sensory loss and associated corneal denervation. Short-term pain relief is similar to RF, although some studies suggest that these are slightly lower than RF, and glycerol may be more preferable to balloon compression.
STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), commonly referred as gamma knife surgery, is the least invasive of the accepted surgical therapies for TN. This is a specific method of SRS that has had the longest use and has been most widely studied. The procedure of SRS involves use of focused, high-intensity radiation to perform a noninvasive lesion of the trigeminal nerve. Since this is a consequence of the tissue response to radiation, the effect of SRS is often delayed from 1 to 3 months, so this may be less beneficial to patients in crisis with urgent need of pain relief. SRS can generally be performed safely on anticoagulated patients. Therefore, this may be a good option as well for patients who cannot safely stop anticoagulation for any length of time.
SRS using the gamma knife is generally very effective in the first 6 to 12 months following treatment, although it may have a slightly lower rate of patients who are pain free without medication. Most studies indicate that 40% to 70% of patients are pain free without medication between 6 and 12 months following the procedure, although generally 70% to 80% of patients report satisfactory pain relief at 1 year regardless of whether or not they have discontinued medication. As with percutaneous procedures, a substantial rate of recurrence is seen progressively over the years. Some studies have reported success with repeat procedures in patients with long-term recurrences. The major complication of SRS is persistent decrease or loss of facial sensation in one or more distributions of the trigeminal nerve in 10% of patients to be as high as 30% in some studies. Generally 70 to 80 Gy is delivered to the isocenter near the root entry zone to achieve good outcomes, with lower doses of radiation associated with poorer outcomes while higher doses are associated with greater sensory loss but without clear additional therapeutic benefit. The patients who fail percutaneous lesioning or MVD are unlikely to benefit from SRS and may in fact have an alternative diagnosis to classic TN.
NEUROMODULATION THERAPIES
Neurostimulation has long been used to treat chronic pain. Currently, spinal cord stimulation and certain types of peripheral nerve stimulation are FDA-approved for pain in the arms, legs, and back. While neurostimulation for facial pain is increasingly being explored, it is currently considered an off-label use of these devices. A potential advantage of neurostimulation is that it is nondestructive and is reversible procedure, which can be effective for difficult cases with unclear diagnosis or where multiple prior therapies have failed. Neurostimulation for pain involves placement of an externalized lead for several days to a week as trial followed by implantation of a permanent system. There have been two primary types of neurostimulation used for facial pain: motor cortex stimulation and peripheral facial stimulation.
MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION
Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is an intracranial procedure where a stimulating electrode is placed on the surface of the brain in order to stimulate the motor cortex. The mechanism of action remains unclear, but it is believed that MCS may stimulate U-fibers which connect to sensory areas. MCS has been used to treat a variety of complicated pain syndromes like:
TN category includes a far broader group of patients than simply classic TN, and therefore it remains unclear if results of treatment specifically in TN would be any better or worse than in the broader group as a whole. Most practitioners used approved spinal cord stimulation paddle electrodes to place on the brain, generally outside the dura to avoid intradural hemorrhage or injury. Due to the invasive nature of this craniotomy procedure, test stimulation is usually performed by attaching the end of the paddle lead to a second lead extension, which is then externalized from a separate stab wound behind the craniotomy incision line. After 1-week trial, if patients report adequate pain relief, then the externalized extension is removed and the lead is attached to a new lead extension which is tunneled to a pulse generator, usually placed in the anterior chest wall.
Most studies have defined a good response as greater than 40% to 50% pain relief in 65% to 75% of patients with trigeminal neuropathic facial pain at 1 year. Complications of surgery are infection, bleeding, and hardware-related complications in 5% to 10% of patients. Ten percent of patients reported to have perioperative seizures, and that may be due to electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex which is more likely to lead to seizures than subcortical stimulation. However, these appear to be isolated seizures, as long-term epilepsy has not been reported in these patients. As the permanent complications appear to be rare, it may be a reasonable consideration as an off-label treatment for patients who have not responded well to conservative therapy and are not good candidates for more traditional TN surgery.
PERIPHERAL FACIAL STIMULATION
As with MCS, peripheral facial stimulation (PFS) is a nonapproved application of neurostimulator system for certain peripheral conditions like:
Due to relatively low morbidity of peripheral stimulation procedure, the ability to trial stimulation prior to permanent implantation and the reversibility of this procedure favor consideration of this technique for select appropriate patients. In this case, a thin lead used for percutaneous stimulation is placed in the subcutaneous tissue of the face in order to stimulate branches of the supraorbital (V1) or infraorbital (V2) sensory nerves. Mandibular stimulation can also be performed, although the extreme mobility of the mandible on an almost continuous basis (talking, eating) raises concerns regarding lead erosions or fractures compared with less mobile sites.
Figure 76-4. Localization of stimulating electrode for peripheral facial stimulation of the trigeminal nerve. In this case, the stimulation was for pain in the V2 distribution and therefore the electrode was placed to stimulate the infraorbital nerve. (A) Lateral skull x-ray demonstrates the infraorbital location of the percutaneous stimulating electrode (B) AP skull x-ray from the same patient again demonstrates the infraorbital placement of the stimulating electrode. The tip of the electrode usually abuts the lateral edge of the nasal bones.
The most widespread use of peripheral stimulation in the head and neck has been stimulation of the occipital nerves for occipital neuralgia and migraine headaches. Some studies have reported trigeminal peripheral stimulation for trigeminal neuropathic pain and postherpetic neuralgia. The studies reported 70% of patients to have good response to trial stimulation and go on to permanent implantation. Of those receiving permanent implants, 50% to 75% of patients maintain greater than 50% pain relief at 2 years. Currently this remains an off-label indication for these devices, and more studies with longer-term follow-ups are needed.
SUMMARY
Facial pain can be one of the more difficult and refractory conditions to manage for pain specialists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons. Medical therapy is clearly the first choice and can be effective in many cases. However, frequently patients do not adequately respond to trials of multiple medications or they become refractory to treatment. In these situations, a variety of surgical therapies can cure or dramatically relieve pain. A proper initial diagnosis is essential, since most accepted surgical therapies are primarily useful for true, idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. However, advances in neuromodulation now provides a variety of novel options for patients who either develop recurrence of pain following more traditional surgery or for those who do not have classical trigeminal neuralgia. At present, these approaches use off-label applications of devices approved for other indications, which can somewhat limit utility of these methods. Nonetheless, these can be considered in isolated cases and further studies should help increase both our understanding of the role of neuromodulation for refractory pain and the eventual broad acceptance of this option.
Suggested Reading
Cetas JS, Saedi T, Burchiel KJ. Destructive procedures for the treatment of nonmalignant pain: a structured literature review. J Neurosurg. 2008;109:389-404.
Dhople AA, Adams JR, Maggio WW, Naqvi SA, Regine WF, Kwok Y. Long-term outcomes of Gamma Knife radiosurgery for classic trigeminal neuralgia: implications of treatment and critical review of the literature. Clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2009;111:351-358.
Fontaine D, Hamani C, Lozano A. Efficacy and safety of motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: critical review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2009;110:251-256.
Gronseth G, Cruccu G, Alksne J, Argoff C, Brainin M, Burchiel K, Nurmikko T, Zakrzewska JM. Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Neurology. 2008;71:1183-1190.
Jannetta PJ. Neurovascular compression in cranial nerve and systemic disease. Ann Surg. 1980;192:518-525.
Leal PR, Hermier M, Froment JC, Souza MA, Cristino-Filho G, Sindou M. Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2010;152:817-825.
Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD. Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: technique and expectations. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18:E7.
Kouzounias K, Lind G, Schechtmann G, Winter J, Linderoth B. Comparison of percutaneous balloon compression and glycerol rhizotomy for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg. 2010;113:486-492.
Lee ST, Chen JF. Percutaneous trigeminal ganglion balloon compression for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia, part II: results related to compression duration. Surg Neurol. 2003;60:149-153; discussion 153-144.
Levy R, Deer TR, Henderson J. Intracranial neurostimulation for pain control: a review. Pain Physician. 2010;13:157-165.
Loescher AR, Radatz M, Kemeny A, Rowe J. Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: outcomes and complications. Br J Neurosurg. 2011.
Lovely TJ, Jannetta PJ. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Surgical technique and long-term results. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1997;8:11-29.
Paemeleire K, Bartsch T. Occipital nerve stimulation for headache disorders. Neurotherapeutics. 2010;7:213-219.
Peddada AV, Sceats DJ, White GA, et al. CyberKnife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: unanticipated iatrogenic effect following successful treatment. J Neurosurg. 2011.
Slavin KV. Peripheral nerve stimulation for the treatment of neuropathic craniofacial pain. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97:115-120.
Slavin KV, Colpan ME, Munawar N, Wess C, Nersesyan H. Trigeminal and occipital peripheral nerve stimulation for craniofacial pain: a single-institution experience and review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2006;21:E5.
Slavin KV, Nersesyan H, Colpan ME, Munawar N. Current algorithm for the surgical treatment of facial pain. Head Face Med. 2007;3:30.
Stuart RM, Winfree CJ. Neurostimulation techniques for painful peripheral nerve disorders. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2009;20:111-120, vii-viii.
Taha JM, Tew JM Jr. Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by percutaneous radiofrequency rhizotomy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1997;8:31-39.
Taha JM, Tew JM Jr, Buncher CR. A prospective 15-year follow up of 154 consecutive patients with trigeminal neuralgia treated by percutaneous stereotactic radiofrequency thermal rhizotomy. J Neurosurg. 1995;83:989-993.
Tatli M, Satici O, Kanpolat Y, Sindou M. Various surgical modalities for trigeminal neuralgia: literature study of respective long-term outcomes. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150:243-255.
van Kleef M, van Genderen WE, Narouze S, et al. 1. Trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Pract. 2009;9:252-259.
Vanelderen P, Lataster A, Levy R, Mekhail N, van Kleef M, Van Zundert J. 8. Occipital neuralgia. Pain Pract. 2010;10:137-144.
Weiner RL. Subcutaneous occipital region stimulation for intractable headache syndromes. Prog Neurol Surg. 2011;24:77-85.
References