Cynthia A. Brincat1 , Christina Lewicky-Gaupp2 and Dee E. Fenner3
(1)
Department of Urology and Obstetrics/Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
(2)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Cynthia A. Brincat (Corresponding author)
Email: cbrincat@lumc.edu
Christina Lewicky-Gaupp
Email: clgaupp@gmail.com
Dee E. Fenner
Email: deef@med.umich.edu
Abstract
An accepted risk factor for pelvic floor disorders is vaginal birth, and its concomitant birth trauma. Much of the effect is mitigated over the life span, with conflicting evidence and unclear causal and mechanistic explanations in the literature of the role of birth trauma. The greatest impact of vaginal birth trauma is on the incidence and prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse [1]. The prognosis of vaginal birth trauma on development or severity of urinary incontinence and anal incontinence is more difficult to determine because of the profound impact that aging has on these conditions. Immediately after birth, little is known about the sequelae of specific trauma other than in the short-term postpartum period. In what follows, we review the literature and aim to elucidate the role of birth trauma, its impact, and prognosis on a parous woman’s pelvic floor.
Keywords
Birth injuryFecal incontinenceUrinary incontinencePelvic painPerineal injuryPostpartumProlapseRisk factors
Introduction
The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders (PFD) as well as their surgical management creates a large burden on patients, providers and the health care system in general. Surgical management of PFDs is common, with a lifetime risk of undergoing a surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence by age 80 being 11.1 % [2]. Projections from United States Census Bureau data indicate that the prevalence of symptomatic PFD will increase by 56 % from 28.1 million to 43.8 million from 2010 to 2050 [3].
An accepted risk factor for PFDs is vaginal birth, and concomitant birth trauma. Pelvic floor disorders at this stressful and exciting time of life offer their own challenges including interruptions of early parenting, frustration with unmet expectations, plus significant time and cost. Within this, it is beneficial to understand the prognosis of common issues and complications that arise within this period in a woman’s life. In what follows, we will address the literature regarding prognosis for the issues surrounding birth and birth trauma.
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury (Oasis)
Of the spectrum of pelvic floor disorders with the most profound effect on quality of life in the postpartum period, fecal and anal incontinence are arguably most disruptive. Fecal incontinence is the complaint of involuntary loss of solid or liquid feces and anal incontinence includes the complaint of involuntary loss of feces or flatus. What is often overlooked in considering these issues is fecal urgency with or without incontinence, including the sudden compelling desire to defecate that is difficult to defer [4]. The most common cause of these disorders in young women is anal sphincter injury at childbirth. The prevalence of anal incontinence reported in the literature among women with sphincter injuries ranges from 20 to 50 % reporting some sort of anal incontinence symptoms in the near postpartum period [5–7]. Anal incontinence can occur in up to one-third of women with obstetrical sphincter injuries with immediate or delayed onset of symptoms [8]. Because of occult injury, the incidence of anal sphincter damage at the time of vaginal delivery is higher than the number of observed injuries would suggest. Overt anal sphincter injury is relatively rare in women without episiotomy or operative vaginal delivery, with an incidence that ranges from 0 to 6.4 % [8–11]. The incidence of occult anal sphincter laceration identified by ultrasonography, ranges from 6.8 to 44 % in parous women [7, 12]. Additionally, data from a large US population-based study indicated that 29.3 % of postpartum women suffer from fecal incontinence (including flatus) when assessing for immediate postpartum symptoms and one in five of these women had undergone a cesarean delivery [13]. Clearly, this is a multifactorial problem that is prevalent not only with vaginal delivery but also with the cesarean delivery population.
In differentiating fecal or flatal incontinence, a systematic review of comparative studies-with short term follow up, showed that anal incontinence was increased after spontaneous vaginal delivery as compared to cesarean delivery (OR: 1.32; 95 % CI 1.04–1.68). However, the risk of severe anal incontinence was not significantly increased between these two groups, even though there was a trend towards more symptoms in the vaginal delivery group [14]. Likewise, in a longitudinal cohort study of women 5–10 years after their first delivery, there was no significant difference in anal incontinence symptoms in women who had been delivered by cesarean compared to those with spontaneous or instrumented delivery [15].
Episiotomy and operative vaginal delivery increase the incidence of severe pelvic floor trauma, yet were performed in 29 % and 9 % of vaginal births, respectively, in 2001 [16, 17] A meta- analysis of six randomized trials compared restrictive to liberal use of episiotomy in 4,850 women concluded that liberal use of episiotomies conferred no benefit and was associated with other complications [18]. Much of the incidence of OASIS depends upon the type of episiotomy performed. In these cases where mediolateral episiotomies are practiced, the rate of OASIS is 1.7 % in all comers and 2.9 % in primiparous patients [19]. Much higher rates are noted in those instances of midline episiotomy, at rates of 12 % for all comers [20] and 19 % in primiparous patients [21]. Operative vaginal delivery was similarly reviewed in 2,582 women and it was concluded that vacuum delivery was associated with a much lower risk of anal sphincter laceration than delivery with forceps (relative risk: .41; 95 % CI .33 to .50) [22]. Prevention of anal sphincter laceration and subsequent development of anal incontinence partly lies in decreasing the use of these interventions at the time of delivery.
While vaginal birth alone is not clearly a risk for fecal incontinence, OASIS increases the risk of subsequent fecal incontinence. Estimates range from 9 to 28 % [11, 23–25]. Likewise the risk of fecal incontinence is increased when there is a disruption of the internal anal sphincter, as compared to the external anal sphincter alone [26]. Although debilitating in younger life, studies of older women in their 50–60s, seem to eradicate the correlation of birth injury in explaining fecal incontinence. Most convincingly, a study of over 2600 women in their 50s demonstrated no significant difference between the prevalence of fecal incontinence between nulliparous, primiparous and multiparous women. These groups had fecal incontinence rates of 11.3 %, 9.0 %, and 10.4 % respectively. This similarity prevailed among parous women, irrespective of mode of delivery [27]. DeLeeuw et al. reported a retrospective cohort study of 125 matched pairs with median follow-up of 14 years after index delivery. Fecal incontinence was reported in 39 women with sphincter lacerations compared to 16 controls (OR: 3.1; 95 % CI 1.57–6.10) [28]. In an American cohort of sphincter injury patients followed at 6 months, the presence of fecal incontinence was associated with white race, antenatal UI, 4th- versus 3rd-degree sphincter tear, older age at time of delivery and higher BMI. There were no factors associated with fecal incontinence at the 6-month postpartum mark in the vaginal delivery group without OASIS or who had undergone a cesarean delivery [26].
The role of midline versus mediolateral episiotomy has been identified as a possible causal factor in explaining the higher rates of anal and fecal incontinence involved in an American cohort, where episiotomies, when performed are midline versus mediolateral. Careful evaluation of findings and subsequent outcomes need to assess this mechanism of OASIS versus that which occurs in the setting of mediolateral episiotomy [29].
In counseling patients for outcomes of primary repair, rates of fecal and anal incontinence vary greatly, not surprisingly, based on the variations in repair techniques, as well as the study design and the manner in which data was collected. A recent prospective study of 241 women at their first vaginal delivery, 59 of whom experienced OASIS, with subsequent repair with trained providers showed no fecal incontinence and no difference in flatal incontinence as compared to those women who had not had a sphincter disruption at 4 years postpartum [30]. What is most hopeful about this study, is that when evidence based protocols are established and implemented, not surprisingly, patient outcomes improve, and thus prognostic indicators improve as well.
In counseling women about future route of delivery, it appears that there is only a modest increase in risk for recurrent OASIS. A retrospective review of a large American cohort (n = 658) showed recurrent OASIS in only a small percentage of women at 3.2 %, with operative vaginal delivery and birth weight of ≥4000 g to be associated with recurrent OASIS [31]. This is consistent with a large Swedish cohort which although showed an increase of sixfold in incidence of sphincter rupture, the incidence was only 3 %. It was however somewhat lower than in another large studies (n = 774), which showed a rate that was still quite low at 7.5 % [21].
Incontinence
The role of vaginal birth as it leads to stress urinary incontinence is well established. The case for urgency incontinence is less so. Rates in the initial postpartum period vary, while 21 % of women are known to have urinary incontinence of some type within 10 weeks of delivery (Scheer). Prevalence of stress (SUI) and urgency (UUI) incontinence 5 years after first vaginal delivery has been shown to be 30 % and 15 % respectively with presence of symptoms at 3 months post-partum being predictive of more and longer lasting symptoms [32].
Most studies are short term in their follow-up, but in the observational analysis by Altman et al. women were followed 10 years out from their first delivery. They found that there were significant increases in stress as well as urgency symptoms at 10 years follow up compared with baseline compared with the 10 years preceding delivery. Most of those in the analyzed cohort experienced mild to moderate symptoms, with a five to six time increase in incidence of urinary incontinence episodes from the time of their first vaginal delivery [33]. Surrogates for perineal trauma did not correlate with the presence of incontinence 10 years after the first delivery, nor did repeat vaginal deliveries [33]. In an American cohort 5–10 years after vaginal or cesarean delivery, spontaneous vaginal birth was associated with a significantly greater odds of SUI (OR 2.9; 95 % CI 1.5–5.5) as compared to cesarean without labor [15]. These findings are not dissimilar to the large population study of Rortveit et al. which found 14.7 % of parous women having symptoms of SUI, as compared to 4.7 % of nulliparous women. In this cohort of greater than 15,000 women, a relative risk of 2.4 for developing SUI was noted, and the number of vaginal deliveries was of limited importance for the outcome as compared to that of the first vaginal delivery [34].
Predictors of postpartum urinary incontinence in several studies include leaking during pregnancy [35, 36] and predictors of incontinence at the 1 year mark, include persistent leakage 4–8 weeks postpartum [37]. Association of other factors with incontinence is worthy of investigation, with findings indicative of OASIS being associated with both pure urge and mixed incontinence. In a large American cohort of 943 women, urge incontinence alone was found in 16.2 % of women and mixed incontinence was found in 14.6 % of women. Stress symptoms were present in 21.3 % of women [38].
Assessments of persistence of urinary incontinence are difficult to obtain. In a longitudinal comparison of women undergoing spontaneous vagina delivery complicated by OASIS, vaginal delivery without OASIS and cesarean delivery without labor of all of the women reporting urinary incontinence at 6 weeks, about 40 % did not report incontinence at 6 months, and about one-third of the urinary incontinence reported at 6 months was not in women who reported incontinence at the 6 week postpartum point [26].
Understanding the significant association is only a first step in the analysis. Further understanding of the structures involved and the mechanism by which the damage occurs can be helpful in assessing pathology and prognosis. In an analysis of primiparous stress incontinent versus continent women at 9–12 months postpartum, maximal urethral closure pressure was 25 % lower in stress incontinent women. In the same analysis comparing primiparous stress continent to nulliparous women, the two groups had similar values [39]. This points to sphincter function as a key component in the continence mechanism and a potential target for therapeutic interventions.
Additionally, primparous women with SUI are twice as likely to have visible LA defects compared to content primiparas [39]. However further analysis of this relationship showed that urethral function measured as a urodynamic variable did not differ in women with and without levator ani muscle injury. This is both frustrating and hopeful. It requires a careful analysis of the continence mechanism of urethral closure pressure and levator ani support, as after birth MUCP change may not necessarily accompany LA change or other anatomical change [40] Second, birth events that injure the LA do not necessarily limit a woman’s ability to augment MUCP with a Kegel effort in the postpartum period as well as later in life [40, 41].
Levator Injury
It is well established that vaginal delivery leads to higher rates of levator ani damage particularly involving both the pubovisceral portion of the levator ani muscle [42]. In an assessment of 160 primiparous women, 32 of the 160 were found to have levator ani defects on MRI. These women with muscle defects were more likely to have had an a difficult delivery with an odds ratio of 14.7 for forceps delivery, 8.1 for anal sphincter rupture, 3.1 for episiotomy [43]. Later in life, these levator defects are more commonly found in women with prolapse (55 %) as compared to normal controls (16 %), leading to an adjusted odds ratio of 7.3 for prolapse in those with a levator ani defect as compared to their counterparts without a muscle defect [1].
The consequences of levator ani injury in the short term are not completely clear other than those with a muscle defect were found to have weaker pelvic floor muscles in the 9–12 month postpartum period as compared to controls [39]. Birth related changes to the levator ani muscles persist in both function and structure with a significant amount of remodeling present in the course of normal postpartum healing. Analysis of the dynamic MRIs of those patients who had experience those factors putting them at risk for levator tear demonstrated that at rest diameters of the urogenital and levator hiatus were smaller on late scans (~7 months postpartum) compared with early scans (~1 month postpartum) by 7.7 and 3.2 mm respectively (p < .05) [44]. These findings were independent of the status of the levator muscles in this cohort. It was also demonstrated by Tunn et al., that the at rest locations of the perineal body, levator and urogenital hiatus locations improve greatly from the 1 day and 2 weeks postpartum mark [45]. This points to an aggressive early resolution of postpartum change in position, just in virtue of time, without any intervention. There was, however, no statistically significant difference in the ability to displace structures during Kegel and Valsalva in the comparison of 1 month and 7 month scans, showing that in this group there is little change in function of the muscles from the early to the later postpartum period [44].
In those patient who had undergone a vaginal delivery, pelvic floor muscle strength 6–11 years after vaginal delivery was similarly assessed with a significant reduction in both strength and duration of contraction in those who had undergone either spontaneous or assisted vaginal delivery. Further, among women with at least one vaginal delivery, pelvic muscle strength was lower among the women with a pelvic floor disorder as compared to those without (p = 0.12) This finding was additionally associated with the obstetric variables at delivery of macrosomia, perineal laceration, episiotomy, anal sphincter laceration, as well as the number of vaginal deliveries [46]. Further, 5–10 years after vaginal delivery an associate of prolapse to or beyond the hymen was found (OR: 5.6; 95 % CI 2.2–14.7) as compared to cesarean without labor [15].
Low Back and Pelvic Pain
Low back and pelvic pain (LBPP) is often reported during pregnancy and postpartum with rates of up to 70 % reported in the literature [47]. The prognosis as measured by the prevalence of LBPP in the postpartum period varies greatly. In one analysis, even at 3 years after giving birth, up to 20 % of women report that their symptoms have still persisted [48]. Another analysis also found a similar prevalence of LBPP of up to 20 % at 6 years postpartum [49], with serious pain affecting approximately 7 % of women at 18 months postpartum [50]. Clearly this is an often neglected but disabling condition facing women in pregnancy and the postpartum period.
In assessing LBPP postpartum, a large cohort out of Sweden, assessed by telephone survey, demonstrated that the prevalence of persistent LBPP 6 months after delivery was 43 % [51]. In this group, approximately one-third of the subjects reported having a previous experience of low back pain or pelvic pain in life before pregnancy. This indicates a multifactorial etiology of LBPP rather than just pregnancy and delivery alone. This is supported by a follow-up study which indicated that an elective cesarean led to an increased risk of persistent LBPP as compared to the vaginal birth cohort [52]. Additionally, in a large Norwegian study at the 6 month postpartum point, neither planned nor emergent cesarean section was associated with increased prevalence of pelvic girdle syndrome (PGS) (pain in anterior and bilateral posterior pelvis). However, planned cesarean section was associated with severe PGS; with 3.1 % of women undergoing a planned cesarean delivery reporting severe PGS as compared to 1.1 % of women who had an unassisted vaginal delivery [53]. In a large Dutch cohort, prevalence of pelvic girdle pain was 74 % at 30 weeks of pregnancy 48 % between 0 and 6 weeks postpartum and 43 % between 6 and 12 weeks postpartum. Predictors for postpartum pelvic girdle pain included more disability at 6 weeks postpartum, higher mean pain scores at 6 weeks postpartum and even the presence of pelvic girdle pain at 6 weeks postpartum, higher birth weight of the baby and higher somatization during pregnancy and at 6 weeks postpartum, and uncomfortable postures at work. Days of bed rest, even just 1–2 days (more so with 3–4 days) decreased the risk of postpartum pelvic girdle pain as compared to no days of bed rest after delivery [54].
For prognosis and improvement, appropriate recognition and treatment is key. In studies by Norén et al., it was found that although the prevalence of residual back pain at 3 years postpartum was 20 %, on exam the pain itself was found to consist of lumbar back pain, posterior pelvic pain and a combination of both. Not surprisingly, findings of disability, muscle endurance and increasing difficulty with exercise was worse in those with a combination of lumbar back pain and posterior pelvic pain. This analysis, rather than accepting “back pain” as a single type of pain, identifies two separate phenomen: lumbar back pain and posterior pelvic pain [49]. Findings such as these and other studies that show that LBPP persists postpartum points to a mechanism different from that often understood as merely joint-related and one in fact more likely to be muscle-related. This is hopeful in that close follow-up with an intervention of physical therapy after delivery can help in rehabilitating and re-training muscles that may have been compromised during pregnancy, and thereby help to avoid serious long-term impairment [49].
Sexual Function
It is well known that the prevalence of sexual dysfunction is high in the female population. More so, there is a large body of epidemiologic data describing short term post-partum sexual dysfunction. Like any postpartum dysfunction, sexual function is a manifestation of multiple factors, including the new parenting responsibility, sleep deprivation, adjustment of the family members, hormonal changes and not least of all pre-pregnancy sexual function and intimacy.
One component of sexual dysfunction in the postpartum period is pain with intercourse. Several studies have pointed to the consequence of worsening perineal trauma in the form of assisted vaginal delivery as a predictor of increased sexual pain postpartum. A large cross-sectional study out of Australia, using mail surveys at 6–7 months postpartum showed a nearly five-fold increased risk of perineal pain, and a two-fold risk of sexual problems with vacuum or forceps delivery as compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery (OR 4.69; 95 % CI 3.2–6.8 and OR 2.06; 95 % CI 1.4–3.0, respectively). This was the case even after controlling for the duration of labor, infant birth weight and degree of perineal trauma [55]. An American cohort had similar findings with no resumption of sexual intercourse at 7 weeks postpartum in those undergoing an assisted delivery. This same group had also endorsed that the delivery had adversely affected their experience of sexual activity as compared to those who had undergone spontaneous vaginal delivery [56].
In light of the prevalence of sexual dysfunction, it is important to keep in mind that nonetheless resumption of sexual activity after delivery occurs relatively soon after the traditional interval of “vaginal rest.” Data indicates that approximately half of women resume sexual activity by 5–6 weeks postpartum [57]. A somewhat lower number of 40 % of women reported being sexually active at the 7 week postpartum point. 241 patients were included in this prospective analysis, 98 of whom underwent episiotomy (mediolateral). In this cohort, being sexually active was not affected by the type or degree of perineal trauma that occurred with delivery [58]. At the 6-month postpartum point, an American cohort of over 500 women reported 94 % having resumed sexual activity. This cohort demonstrated slightly lower rates in those having undergone OASIS (88 %) and cesarean delivery (86 %) [59].
Most frustrating in any analysis of postpartum sexual function is the lack of attention it garners. In a London teaching hospital with a large obstetrics unit, only 15 % of women with a sexual problem post-partum felt comfortable raising these issues with their health care provider and only 18 % of all obstetric patients reported receiving information about changes in sexual function post-partum. Although as reported, a vast majority of women have resumed intercourse at the 3 month postpartum mark, analysis of a different cohort demonstrated that at the 2 month postpartum mark, 55 % of women experienced painful penetration and 45 % experienced painful intercourse [60]. Determining who these patients will be is more complicated than merely screening those who in their delivery experienced perineal trauma or assisted delivery. Clearly, pre-delivery sexual function plays a role as lack of satisfaction with one’s relationship at the 1 year postpartum mark was predicted by not being sexually active at 12 weeks of pregnancy [61].
As with many postpartum issues, longer term analysis is somewhat confounding. Studies of identical twins demonstrated that those who were sexually active were more likely to be premenopausal and multiparous as compared to their opposite counterparts. However, beyond that, nulliparous women who were sexually active reported superior sexual satisfaction scores compared with parous women, regardless of age and mode of delivery of their parous counterparts [61]. Another population based study of a cohort 40 years old or older demonstrated no significant associations between parity or mode of delivery and the outcomes of low sexual desire, less than monthly sexual activity, or low overall sexual satisfaction. This was the case with the exception that those who had undergone operative vaginal delivery were more likely to report low sexual desire (OR-1.38; 95 % CI 1.04–1.83) [62]. These studies point to some resolution or at least an adaptation to the short term postpartum effects on sexual function. In the setting of a paucity of intervention based versus observational research on the consequences of parity, birth and birth trauma on sexual function and the high prevalence of sexual dysfunction in women, we would be well served to screen women during their pregnancy and in the postpartum period.
Conclusion
In general, medicine has a limited ability to determine prognosis in complicated multifactorial cases. Nowhere is this more apparent than in predicting prognosis of birth-related injury and trauma. There is a clearly a large need for well-designed randomized controlled trials for interventions in the postpartum period. Much of this work is likely to come from the well-established postpartum perineal clinics.
In light of the prevalence of disorders, there needs to be an emphasis on screening new mothers and newly delivered multiparous women for the consequences and signs of the various manifestations of post-partum sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders.
In summary, when determining the prognosis of women with pelvic floor trauma, we can make some generalizations. Women that develop urinary incontinence during pregnancy are more likely to suffer urinary incontinence after delivery. If she continues to leak urine after 3 months, she may improve, but is likely to have some persistent symptoms. Anal incontinence immediately after delivery is common with a sphincter laceration, but in the vast majority of cases will resolve. As the woman ages, she may be at increased risk for developing FI, but the data is unclear. Levator ani muscle tears are associated with pelvic organ prolapse, UI and FI. The immediate impact of the muscle tears are not well studied. There are strong associations with LA tears and pelvic organ prolapse as the women age. But again not all women with LA tears have clinically relevant prolapse and we do not know the prognostic factors to determine which women will go on to develop problems later in life. Sexual function within the first 6 months of delivery is often painful for women, especially if there has been a perineal laceration or sphincter tear. Fortunately most discomfort will resolve by a year.
Some women are no doubt innately more prone to the development of pelvic floor disorders based on genetic factors, body weight and muscle mass, levels of physical activity etc. A birth injury in one woman may lead to devastating consequences, while another woman with the same injury may heal and suffer no symptoms. Our challenge now is to determine which women will suffer the injuries, what are the modifiable risk factors, and how can we stop the progression of disease and symptoms. Without a clear understanding, we are limited in describing associations, and our counseling of patients is thereby limited as well.
References
1.
DeLancey JO, Morgan DM, Fenner DE, Kearney R, Guire K, Miller JM, et al. Comparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:295–302.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;3:230.
4.
Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN, International Urogynecological Association, International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn. 2010;29:4–20.PubMed
5.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Thomas JM, Bartram CI. Anal-sphincter disruption during vaginal delivery. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1905–11.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Effect of pregnancy on anal sphincter morphology and function. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1993;8:206–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcomes of primary repair. BMJ. 1994;308:887–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860–1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1982;38:322–38.CrossRef
9.
Helwig JT, Thorp JM, Bowes WA. Does midline episiotomy increase the risk of third and fourth degree lacerations in operative vaginal deliveries? Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:276–9.PubMed
10.
Combs CA, Robertson PA, Laros RK. Risk factors for third-degree and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:100–4.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zetterstrom J, Lopez A, Anzen B, Norman M, Holmström B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:21–8.PubMed
12.
Varma A, Gunn J, Gardiner A, Lindow SW, Duthie GS. Obstetrical anal sphincter injury: prospective evaluation and incidence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1537–43.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Guise JM, Morris C, Osterwil P, Li H, Rosenberg D, Greenlick M. Incidence of fecal incontinence after childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:281–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Pretlove SJ, Thompson PJ, Tooz-Hobson PM, Radley S, Khan KS. Does the mode of delivery predispose women to anal incontinence in the first year postpartum? A comparative systematic review. BJOG. 2008;115:421.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Handa V, Blomquist J, Knoepp L, Hoskey K, McDermott KC, Muñoz A. Pelvic floor disorders 5–10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:777–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2002, National vital statistics reports, vol. 52, no 10. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003.
17.
Hall MJ, DeFrances CJ. 2001 National Hospital Discharge Survey, Advanced data from vital and health statistics, vol. 332. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2003.
18.
Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000081.
19.
Harkin R, Fitzpatrick M, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Anal sphincter disruption at vaginal delivery: is recurrence predictable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Repord Biol. 2003;109(2):149–52.CrossRef
20.
Coats PM, Chan KK, Wilkins M, Beard RJ. A comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87:408–12.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Peleg D, Kennedy CM, Merrill D, Zlatnik FJ. Risk of repetition of a severe perineal laceration. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(6):1021–4.PubMed
22.
Johanson RB, Menon BKV. Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000224.
23.
Sanagalli MR, Floris L, Faltin D, Weil A. Anal incontinence in women with third or fourth degree perineal tears and subsequent vaginal deliveries. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;40:244.CrossRef
24.
Pollack J, Nordenstam J, Brismar S, Lopez A, Altman D, Zetterstrom J. Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a five year prospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:1397.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Nygaard IE, Rao SS, Dawson JD. Anal incontinence after anal sphincter disruption: a 30-year retrospective cohort study. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:896.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Borello-France D, Burgio KL, Richter HE, Zyczynski H, Fitzgerald MP, Whitehead W, et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:863.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Fritel X, Ringa V, Varnoux N, Zins M, Bréart G. Mode of delivery and fecal incontinence at midlife: as study of the 2640 women in the Gazel cohort. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:31.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW. Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. BJOG. 2008;115:234–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Burgio K, Borello-France D, Richter H, Fitzgerald M, Whitehead W, Handa V, et al.; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Risk factors for fecal and urinary incontinence after childbirth: the childbirth and pelvic symptoms study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1998–2004.
30.
Andrews V, Shelmeridine S, Sultan A, Thakar R. Anal and urinary incontinence 4 years after a vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:55–60.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Basham E, Stock L, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Mitchell C, Gossett D. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2013;19:328–32.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Viktrup L. The risk of lower urinary tract symptoms five years after the first delivery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(1):2–29.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Altman D, Ekström Å, Gustafsson C, López A, Falconer C, Zetterström J. Risk of urinary incontinence after childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;4(108):873–8.CrossRef
34.
Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, Hunskaar S, Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:900–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Thomason AD, Miller JM, DeLancey JO. Urinary incontinence symptoms during and after pregnanc in continent and incontinent primiparas. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18(2):147–51.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Baracho SM, Barbosa da Silva L, Baracho E, Lopes da Silva Filho A, Sampaio RF, Mello de Fiqueiredo E. Pelvic floor muscle strength predicts stress urinary incontinence in primiparous women after vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(7):899–906.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Schytt E, Lindmark G, Waldenström U. Symptoms of stress incontinence 1 year after childbirth: prevalence and predictors in a national Swedish sample. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(10):928–36.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Fenner D, Genber B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gyneol. 2003;189:1543–50.CrossRef
39.
DeLancey JO, Miller JM, Kearney R, Howard D, Reddy P, Umek W, et al. Vaginal birth and de novo stress incontinence: relative contributions of urethral dysfunction and mobility. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;2:354–62.CrossRef
40.
Brincat C, DeLancey JO, Miller J. Urethral closure pressures among primiparous women with and without levator ani muscle defects. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22:1491–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
Miller JM, Umek WH, Delancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA. Can women without visible pubococcygeal muscle in MR images still increase urethral closure pressures? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:171–5.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Delancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;1:46–53.
43.
Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey JO. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:144–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
44.
Yousuf A, DeLancey JO, Brandon C, Miller J. Pelvic structure and function at 1 month compared to 7 months by dynamic magnetic resonance after vaginal birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(5):514.e1–7.CrossRef
45.
Tunn R, DeLancey JO, Howard D, Hrop JM, Ashton-Miller JA, Quint LEE. MR imaging of levator ani muscle recovery following vaginal delivery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1999;10:300–7.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Friedman S, Blomquist J, Nugent J, McDermott K, Muñoz A, Handa V. Pelvic muscle after childbirth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;5(120):1021–8.
47.
Kristianson P, Svärsudd K, von Schoultz B. Back pain during pregnancy. Spine. 1996;21:702–9.CrossRef
48.
Norén L, Östgaard S, Johansson G, Östgaard HC. Lumbar back and posterior pelvic pain during pregnancy: a 3 year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:267–71.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Östgaard HC, Zetherström G, Roos-Hansson E. Back pain in relation to pregnancy: a 6 year follow-up. Spine. 1997;22:2945–50.CrossRefPubMed
50.
Östgaard HC, Andersson GBJ, Karlsson K. Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy. Spine. 1991;17:53–5.CrossRef
51.
Mogran IM. BMI, pain and hypermobility are determinants of long term outcome for women with low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(7):1093–102.CrossRef
52.
Mogran IM. Does Caesarean section negatively influence the post-partum prognosis of low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy? Eur Spine J. 2007;16:115–21.CrossRef
53.
Bjelland E, Stuge B, Vangen S, Stray-Pederson B, Eberhard-Gran M. Mode of delivery and persistence of pelvic girdle syndrome 6 months postpartum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:298.e1–7.CrossRef
54.
Stomp-van den Berg S, Hendriksen I, Bruinvels D, Twisk J, van Mechelen W, van Poppel M. Predictors for postpartum pelvic girdle pain in working women: The Mom@Work cohort study. Pain. 2012;153:2370–9.CrossRefPubMed
55.
Brown S, Lumley J. Maternal health after childbirth: results of an Australian population based survey. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998;105:156–61.CrossRefPubMed
56.
Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Martin DP. Delivery method and self-reported postpartum general health status among primiparous women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001;15:232–40.CrossRefPubMed
57.
Rogers RG, Borders N, Leeman LM, Albers LL. Does spontaneous genital tract trauma impact postpartum sexual function? J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009;54:98–103.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan A, Jones P. Evaluation of postpartum perineal pain and dyspareunia—a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;137:152–6.CrossRefPubMed
59.
Brubaker L, Handa VL, Bradley CS, Connolly A, Moalli P, Brown MB, et al. Sexual function 6 months after first delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1040–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
60.
Barrett G, Pendry E, Peackock J, Vicotr C, Thakar R, Manyonda I. Women’s sexual health after childbirth. BJOG. 2000;107:186–95.CrossRefPubMed
61.
Van Brummen HJ, Bruinse HW, van de Pol G, Heintz AP, van der Vaart CH. Which factors determine the sexual function 1 year after childbirth? BJOG. 2006;113:914–8.CrossRefPubMed
62.
Botros SM, Abramov Y, Miller JJ, Sank PK, Gandhi S, Nickolov A, Goldberg RP. Effect of parity on sexual function: an identical twin study. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):765–70.CrossRefPubMed