The 5 Minute Urology Consult 3rd Ed.

URETER AND RENAL PELVIC TUMORS, GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

Julie M. Riley, MD

Timothy D. Averch, MD, FACS

BASICS

DESCRIPTION

• Tumors of the ureter and renal pelvis are relatively rare.

• Tumors are most often malignant and account for 5% of all urothelial tumors; most commonly TCC (transitional cell carcinoma), also called urothelial cell carcinoma (UCC).

EPIDEMIOLOGY

Incidence

• 1 in 113,333 or ∼2400 cases/yr

• 7% of all kidney tumors

• Ureteric TCC account for 1 in every 25 upper-tract tumors

• Males:female = 2:1

• More common in Caucasian population

– Asians more often have high-grade tumors

Prevalence

Rare <40 yr, peak incidence 6th–7th decade

RISK FACTORS

• Smoking: Risk from 2.6–8.0

– Increases with higher dose and duration

• History of bladder cancer: 2–25% of patients with bladder cancer develop upper-tract TCC

• Occupational exposure: Similar to bladder cancer; risk from 4.0 to 5.5

– ∼20% of TCCs

– Disease latency of 30–50 yr

– Aromatic amines (aniline dyes [color fabrics]), 2-naphthylamine, 4-aminobiphenyl, 4-nitrobiphenyl, 4,4-diaminobiphenyl, 2-amino-1-naphthol, soot from coal, combustion gas, and aliphatic hydrocarbons

– High-risk jobs: Autoworkers, leather workers, painters, truck drivers, met al workers, machinists, dry cleaners, dental technicians, beauticians, and physicians

• Coffee: Minor contribution, relative risk of 1.3

• Analgesic abuse: All components implicated; highest risk with phenacetin abuse; latency of 25 yr (dose of 10–15 g over 10 yr); tend to be women who present with high-stage tumors. Relative risk: 2.4 for men and 4.2 for women

• Cyclophosphamide: Hemorrhagic cystitis and carcinoma; 9 times increased risk of carcinoma after exposure; latency of 6–13 yr

• Infectious agents: Chronic bacterial infection with calculi and obstruction; increased risk of SCC (squamous-cell carcinoma)

• Balkan nephropathy: Endemic to Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, and Yugoslavia

– Carcinogenic potential of Aristolochia fangchi and Aristolochia clematis (plants endemic to the Balkans).

– Often multiple, bilateral, and indolent tumors

– Renal-sparing surgery when possible

• Black Foot disease: Vasculopathy in Taiwan; arsenic contamination of water

• Lynch syndrome

Genetics

• Most have no family history of disease

• Certain familial cancer syndromes show an increased incidence of TCC (Lynch type II)

• Familial clustering exists; difficult to determine if related to environmental factors

• Low-grade superficial TCC: p15 and p16 loss (chromosome 9p)

• High-grade TCC: p53 loss (chromosome 17p)

• Amplification and overexpression of genes that code for growth factors or their receptors

– EGF-R (chromosome 7): Trisomy 7 associated with TCC

– Erb-2 mutations associated with TCC

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

• >90% upper tract urothelial tumors are TCCs

– ∼70% ureteral TCCs occur in distal ureter, 25% mid ureter, and 5% proximal ureter.

– Tumors of the ureter tend to be less invasive and smaller than those of the renal pelvis.

– Up to 50% of ureteral TCCs are multicentric.

• SCC: 7%; associated with long-term infection, inflammation, and calculi

• Rare malignant tumors include sarcoma, adenocarcinoma, and carcinosarcoma.

• Rare benign tumors include inverted papilloma and fibroepithelial polyp.

ASSOCIATED CONDITIONS

Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

GENERAL PREVENTION

• Smoking cessation

• Avoid or limit chronic analgesia use.

• Avoid exposure to implicated toxins

DIAGNOSIS

HISTORY

• Age and sex of patient: Peak incidence in mid-60s, male > female

• Hematuria: Most common presenting symptom (75% of patients)

• Dull flank pain due to the gradual distention of collecting system (30% of patients)

• Tobacco use or occupational exposure (up to 20% of TCCs)

• History of analgesia abuse in past: Dose-related effect; phenacetin is most common

• History of recurrent infections and calculi: SCC

• Asymptomatic: Incidental diagnosis in 10–15%

• Rarely, patients present with signs of advanced disease (abdominal or flank mass, anorexia, weight loss, etc.)

PHYSICAL EXAM

Usually normal; flank or abdominal mass with advanced disease

DIAGNOSTIC TESTS & INTERPRETATION

Lab

• Urine analysis: Hematuria (gross or microscopic)

• Cytopathology:

– Voided specimen: Low sensitivity for upper-tract TCC; ureteral catheterization specimens are more sensitive.

– Accuracy increases with increasing grade of tumor.

Imaging

• Intravenous pyelogram (IVP):

– 50–75%: Radiolucent filling defect; irregular and continuous with the wall

– 10–30% show obstruction or non-visualization of the collecting system, which indicates more invasive disease

– Assess contralateral kidney for lesion and function

• Retrograde pyelography (RGP): Better visualization than IVP (>75% accuracy)

• Antegrade pyelography:

– Used only if not possible to visualize collecting system via retrograde approach utilizing a percutaneous nephrostomy tube.

• Computed Tomography Urogram (CTU): Primary imaging study, used for diagnosis and staging of tumors (image)

• Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): For staging

Diagnostic Procedures/Surgery

• Ureteroscopy (URS) and nephroscopy (image):

– Diagnostic accuracy of 58–83%.

– Not accurate for staging TCCs due to difficulty in determining the depth of invasion, particularly renal pelvic TCC

• Brush biopsy:

– High positive predictive value, overall accuracy of 78%

– significant risk of bleeding and perforation

• Selective cytology barbotage (repeated injection and aspiration of saline): Localize tumor

Pathologic Findings

• Urothelial carcinoma: Papillary (exophytic) predominate:

– Slender stalks or endophytic (flat)

– Invasive or noninvasive

– Almost no tumors of low malignant potential in the upper tract

• SCC is characterized by sheets of cells with well-defined cell borders, deeply eosinophilic cytoplasm, and focal keratin pearl formation.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

• Malignant filling defect of ureter and renal pelvis:

– TCC Urothelial cell carcinoma: The most common malignant cause of upper urinary tract filling defects.

– Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)

– Rare malignant tumors: Adenocarcinoma, sarcoma, angiosarcoma, and carcinosarcoma

– Renal cell carcinoma (RCC)

• Benign filling defect of the ureter and renal pelvis:

– Air: Iatrogenic, infectious, or due to fistula

– Blood clot

– Fibroepithelial polyp

– Fungus ball

– Hemangioma

– Inflammatory lesions: Granuloma, malakoplakia, tuberculosis

– Inverted papilloma

– Radiolucent calculus

– Rare benign tumors: Leiomyoma, neurofibroma, cholesteatoma

– Renal or sloughed papilla

– Extrinsic compression on the ureter

– Mucus: Urinary diversion patients

– Protein matrix

– Ureteritis or pyelitis cystica

– Vascular impression

TREATMENT

GENERAL MEASURES

• If positive cytology is the only sign of upper tract TCC, close follow-up is required.

• Standard treatment is surgical for most benign and malignant lesions.

MEDICATION

First Line

N/A

Second Line

• Instillation therapy with BCG or mitomycin not proven to increase survival:

– Appears to be safe

– May be useful in multiple superficial tumors or bilateral disease

– Difficult to deliver the agent in adequate doses and dwell time

SURGERY/OTHER PROCEDURES

• Standard treatment is nephroureterectomy (NU): Laparoscopic or open

• Renal-sparing surgery indicated: Solitary kidney, bilateral disease, poor function of contralateral kidney, or low grade and stage

• Survival related to stage and grade of tumor rather than to treatment modality

• Radical NU and excision of bladder cuff

– 80–90% 5-yr survival (low grade and stage)

– 30–75% recurrence rate in ureteral stump

– Radical lymphadenectomy not shown to improve survival

– Endoscopic approach to bladder cuff resection has slightly higher rate of bladder recurrence (1)

• Endoscopic treatment (ureteroscopy [URS]) or percutaneous):

– Indications: solitary kidney, poor renal function, bilateral disease, moderate tumor burden, low-grade, poor surgery candidate

– Risk of perforation is higher than that in bladder (overall complication rate: 7%)

– Requires close follow-up due to high recurrence rate (recurrence free survival ∼ 20% at 10 yr) (2)

– Laser ablation in low-grade or multiple tumors

– Seeding of percutaneous tract is low (0.03%) (3)

• Segmental ureteral resection: Solitary low-grade upper and mid-ureteral lesions:

– Recurrence rate of 6%; higher if multifocal

• Distal ureterectomy and ureteroneocystostomy: Distal, solitary ureteral lesions

• Benign tumors such as fibroepithelial polyp or inverted papilloma: Endoscopic management

ADDITIONAL TREATMENT

Radiation Therapy

Can be used for advanced tumors not amenable to surgery, with decreased efficacy

Additional Therapies

• Neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy has not been established as in bladder cancer (3)

– Cisplatin therapies have been successful

Complementary & Alternative Therapies

N/A

ONGOING CARE

PROGNOSIS

• Recurrence rate reduced with more aggressive resection of tumor:

– 48% recurrence with nephrectomy

– 32% with nephrectomy plus partial ureterectomy

– 24% with nephrectomy plus subtotal ureterectomy

– 12% with NU

• Prognosis largely unchanged in locally advanced disease for last 20 yr

• Better survival for tumors in renal pelvis than ureteral in T3 or higher disease

COMPLICATIONS

• Obstruction of urinary tract

• Development of metastatic disease

FOLLOW-UP

Patient Monitoring

• Cystoscopy with cytology every 3–6 mo for 2–3 yr, then yearly

• 6-mo CT urogram + chest x-ray, then annually

• URS is more sensitive than radiologic techniques for follow-up of upper-tract TCC

Patient Resources

Urology Care Foundation http://www.urologyhealth.org/urology/index.cfm?article=39

REFERENCES

1. Xylinas E, Rink M, Cha EK, et al. Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2012; 65(1):210–217.

2. Cutress ML, Stewart GD, Wells-Cole S, et al. Long-term endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: 20 year single centre experience. BJU Int. 2012;110(11):1608–1617.

3. Alva AS, Matin SF, Lerner SP, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9(5):266–273.

ADDITIONAL READING

• Cutress ML, Stewart GD, Zakikhani P, et al. Ureteroscopic and percutaneous management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review. BJU Int. 2012;110(5):614–628.

• Ristau BT, Tomaszewski JJ, Ost MC. Upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Current treatment and outcomes. Urology. 2012;79(4):749–756.

• Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Compérat E, et al. European guidelines on upper tract urothelial carcinomas: 2013 update. Eur Urol. 2013;63(6):1059–1071.

See Also (Topic, Algorithm, Media)

• Filling Defect, Upper Urinary Tract (Renal Pelvis and Ureter)

• Reference Tables: TNM: Renal Pelvis and Ureter Cancer

• Ureter and Renal Pelvic Tumors, General Considerations Images

• Ureter and Renal Pelvis, Squamous Cell Carcinoma

• Ureter and Renal Pelvis, Urothelial Carcinoma

CODES

ICD9

• 189.1 Malignant neoplasm of renal pelvis

• 189.2 Malignant neoplasm of ureter

• 239.5 Neoplasm of unspecified nature of other genitourinary organs

ICD10

• C65.9 Malignant neoplasm of unspecified renal pelvis

• C66.9 Malignant neoplasm of unspecified ureter

• D49.5 Neoplasm of unspecified behavior of other genitourinary organs

CLINICAL/SURGICAL PEARLS

• Ureteral and renal pelvic tumors are rare.

• Management remains surgical with NU being the gold standard.

• Endoscopic management is becoming more accepted but the risk of under staging and under grading remains.

• Close follow-up is warranted and ureteroscopy remains the most sensitive surveillance test.



If you find an error or have any questions, please email us at admin@doctorlib.org. Thank you!