Abeloff's Clinical Oncology, 4th Edition

Part III – Specific Malignancies

Chapter 74 – Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers: Basal Cell and Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Gary S. Wood,Juliet Gunkel,
Daniel Stewart,
Ellen Gordon,
Mamad M. Bagheri,
Manish Gharia,
Stephen N. Snow

SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

Incidence

1 million new cases occur annually including 80% basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and 20% squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs).

Incidence is increasing 2% to 3% per year.

SCC incidence is increased 18- to 36-fold in organ transplant recipients.

Etiology and Epidemiology

Ultraviolet radiation from sun exposure is a major risk factor and causes mutations in key genes.

Hedgehog signaling pathway mutations are involved in BCC pathogenesis.

p53 mutations are involved in both SCC and BCC pathogenesis, as well as in the development of actinic keratoses, which are the precursors of SCCs.

Pathology and Biology

Several histopathologic subtypes exist.

The more infiltrative or poorly differentiated variants are more clinically aggressive (e.g., morpheaform BCC and spindle cell SCC).

Clinical Findings

BCC and SCC are found mainly on sun-exposed skin.

Classic BCC is a pearly, telangiectatic, variably ulcerated nodule or a pale, sclerotic plaque.

Classic SCC is a flesh-tone or red, variably keratotic, variably ulcerated nodule.

Differential Diagnosis and Staging

Amelanotic melanoma, keratoacanthoma, cutaneous metastasis, cutaneous lymphoma, cutaneous lymphoid hyperplasia, adnexal tumor, Merkel cell carcinoma, and sebaceous gland carcinoma are included in the differential diagnosis.

BCCs that are large, deep, or infiltrative may be locally aggressive and recurrent but metastasize only rarely (<0.05%).

SCCs have a greater metaststic rate, especially those that are large, deep, have perineural invasion, or are located on the dorsal hands, lips, ears, penis, or sites of chronic infection, ulceration, or radiation.

Primary Therapy and Salvage Therapy

Primary treatment for both BCCs and SCCs is surgical. Mohs’ surgery is preferred for ill-defined or aggressive lesions because it allows microscopic control of tumor margins.

Alternative therapies include various forms of physical destruction and radiation therapy. Interferons and inducers of interferons (e.g., imiquimod) are proving useful in selected cases.

Retinoids, COX-2 inhibitors, and difluoromethylornithine are promising chemopreventive agents.

Combinations of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy can be used for metastatic disease.

Complications

Complications are principally related to local factors and include local recurrence, destruction of adjacent structures, scarring, and loss of function.

Prognosis

Relative to most other forms of cancer, the overall prognosis for BCCs and SCCs is very good. There are only about 2000 deaths annually in the United States as compared with about 1 million new cases diagnosed.

Local recurrence is a problem for large, deep, or histologically infiltrative variants. SCCs with these features may also metastasize. The 5-year survival for patients with metastatic SCC is <50%.

The rarer forms of nonmelanoma skin cancer have a significantly more aggressive clinical course as compared with BCC and SCC. These include sebaceous carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP), and cutaneous angiosarcoma.

INTRODUCTION

Most nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) or squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). However, several rarer forms of NMSC exist, including four malignant neoplasms discussed in this chapter: sebaceous gland carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, angiosarcoma, and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP). Each of these neoplasms is discussed separately after a summary of genetic alterations in BCC, SCC, and selected genodermatoses. Understanding the genetic basis of skin cancer is an important step in improving prognosis among patients with these neoplasms. Analysis of germline mutations in familial cancer syndromes and somatic mutations in sporadic skin cancers is providing new information that will facilitate the diagnosis of cutaneous malignant diseases and revolutionize their management.

GENETICS OF NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER

Advances in molecular genetics have allowed for key advances in our understanding of NMSC, the most common cancer in the United States. Like visceral malignant neoplasms, cancer of the integument is caused by defects in the normal genetic code. These genomic defects are either germline mutations (those caused by inherited mutations) or somatic mutations (those caused by acquired mutations). Actual tumor formation, however, is a complicated process, usually requiring more than a single mutation and sometimes a combination of germline and somatic mutations. In addition, these cancerous cells are frequently altered in ways that help them escape detection by the host's immune system.

Tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes are two basic classes of genes that undergo mutations leading to skin cancer. Examples of tumor suppressor genes include the patched gene involved in development of BCC, p53 involved in development of SCC, and the xeroderma pigmentosum genes involved in development of BCC, SCC, and melanoma. [1] [2] [3] These genes can be further divided into tumor suppressor genes that directly participate in growth regulation, such as the patched and p53 genes, and those that participate indirectly and are called caretaker genes, such as the xeroderma pigmentosum genes encoding DNA repair enzymes.

Oncogenes are the other class of genes contributing to skin cancer formation. These are generally growth-signaling molecules that once mutated can perpetually lead normal cells to become malignant cells by altering cellular growth. One example is the ras oncogene implicated in several skin cancers, including BCC, SCC, and melanoma. [4] [5]

Sonic Hedgehog Pathway

The sonic hedgehog (Shh) pathway has been implicated in both hereditary and sporadic cases of BCC. These tumors are the most common of all skin cancers, with an estimated 1 million new cases per year.[6] In the Shh pathway, the transmembrane protein receptor for Shh, known as patched1 (Ptch1), binds and inhibits another transmembrane protein called smoothened (Smoh).[7] Smoh is responsible for growth promotion, and binding by Ptch1 keeps this growth in check. However, when the soluble lipoprotein Shh binds Ptch1, this regulation is disrupted. Smoh is thus activated, and unregulated growth is promoted through downstream zinc-finger family transcription factors, such as gli1, gli2, and gli3.

The hedgehog pathway was originally elucidated in the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), in which mutations in the gene cause segmental patterning defects, hence the name patched.[8] Involvement in human disease was found through analysis of nevoid BCC kindreds (Gorlin's syndrome, basal cell nevus syndrome).[9] Persons with this autosomal dominant disease have odontogenic cysts, skeletal defects, palmar pits, various associated visceral tumors (medulloblastoma, meningioma, fibrosarcoma, cardiac fibroma, and ovarian fibroma), and multiple BCCs by a median age of 20 years. Early analyses mapped the defect to a tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 9q22–q31.[10] This site proved to be the location of the Ptch1 gene. It was later elucidated that patients with nevoid BCC syndrome inherit one defective chromosome 9q region with loss of heterozygosity in the Ptch1 locus. Many BCCs from these patients show inactivation of the remaining Ptch1 gene through acquired somatic mutations, consistent with the view that the BCC phenotype develops once both alleles are nonfunctional. Thus, Ptch1 acts as a classic tumor suppressor gene in the skin. Mutations in Ptch1 also are present in many sporadic BCCs, as are mutations in other Shh pathway genes, including Smoh, Ptch2, and Shh.[11]

p53 Mutations

The protein p53 is encoded by the TP53 gene on chromosome 17p and is an important regulator of cell proliferation, DNA repair, and apoptosis.[12] TP53 can act classically as a tumor suppressor gene or act in a dominant-negative role whereby abnormal, mutant p53 protein can bind normal p53 molecules and disrupt their function.

Inactivation of the p53 gene seems to play a principal role in the development of both premalignant actinic keratosis and SCC.[13] SCC is the second most common skin cancer, accounting for approximately 200,000 cases per year and 2000 deaths per year.[6] p53 mutations causing SCC are ultraviolet (UV) induced, and many are pyrimidine alterations with CC to TT changes. [14] [15] It seems that it is both the loss of the tumor suppressor ability of p53 and the ability of UV irradiation to affect induction of apoptosis by p53 that leads to tumor formation.[13]

Mutations of TP53 have been implicated in development of sporadic BCC.[15] It seems that UV-induced alterations similar to those in SCC are involved in BCC induction. Many of the mutations are CC to TT or C to T alterations, consistent with UV damage.

Mutations of Caretaker Genes

Tumor suppressor genes involved in maintaining genomic integrity are called caretaker genes.[16] Examples of diseases associated with cutaneous malignant tumors and known defects in caretaker genes include xeroderma pigmentosum, Bloom syndrome, Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, Werner's syndrome, and Muir-Torre syndrome.

The tumor suppressor genes involved in all of these familial syndromes have the common feature of being involved in an enzymatic DNA reparative process following a mutagenic insult. Defects in these genes inhibit the ability to repair genetic damage from naturally occurring events or environmental carcinogens such as UV radiation.

Xeroderma pigmentosum is a collection of autosomal recessive disorders characterized by severe photosensitivity with onset of cutaneous malignant lesions at a very early age. BCC, actinic keratosis, SCC, and melanoma develop during the first decade of life in persons without adequate photoprotection. Mutations in eight genes have been implicated in different xeroderma pigmentosum phenotypes, which vary in severity of cutaneous neoplasia and frequency of neurologic delay.[17] All xeroderma pigmentosum-associated genes encode proteins that are part of a DNA repair process known as nucleotide excision repair, which responds to UV-induced DNA damage.[3] These proteins recognize the damaged DNA, unwind the coiled DNA structure, and repair the damaged strand. Germline mutations in these genes result in defects in the repair process and their genomic caretaker role; however, actual tumor production is still caused by mutagenic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes such as TP53 and activation of oncogenes such as ras. [18] [19]

Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, Bloom syndrome, and Werner's syndrome all are rare autosomal recessive disorders that have known defects in helicase genes and affect nucleotide excision repair. Like xeroderma pigmentosum, these defects allow development of malignant skin lesions in affected patients. Rothmund-Thomson and Bloom syndromes both are marked by early onset of SCC; however, patients with Werner's syndrome seem to have only increased risk of melanoma. Other syndromes with helicase gene defects, such as Cockayne's syndrome and photosensitive trichothiodystrophy, have no associated increase in cutaneous malignant tumors. It is becoming clear that development of cutaneous malignant tumors is a complex process in which ability to repair DNA is but one part of an intricate pathway. It seems that other mutations in tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes, whether germline or somatic, are necessary to invoke a tumor phenotype, as seen in xeroderma pigmentosum.

Muir-Torre syndrome (MTS) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by various sebaceous gland tumors and internal malignant lesions. The sebaceous gland tumors range from benign sebaceous adenoma to malignant sebaceous gland carcinoma predominantly on the face. Keratoacanthoma is another cutaneous neoplasm of variable malignant potential that has been reported in as many as 20% of MTS patients.[20]

In initial studies of MTS families, investigators identified germline mutations in the human MSH2 gene. [21] [22] Subsequently, mutations in human MLH1 have also been identified in patients with MTS.[23]It seems that, like other caretaker genes, human MSH2 and MLH1 encode a type of DNA-mismatch repair enzyme involved in repairing errors in DNA replication that occur naturally at a low rate.

In cells that have this defect, the result is varying lengths of repetitive DNA sequences known as microsatellite instability.[23] This microsatellite instability can result in functional gene mutations and has been observed in keratoacanthoma and sebaceous tumors from MTS patients.[24]

ras Oncogene

Mutations in ras have been implicated in development of sporadic BCC, premalignant actinic keratosis, and sporadic SCC. They are among the most common mutations in human malignant disease.[25] ras proteins are small G-proteins responsible for transducing intracellular signaling. Activation of ras occurs only when guanosine triphosphate (GTP) is bound. The signal is attenuated by hydrolysis of GTP to guanosine diphosphate (GDP). Mutations in ras alter the rate of this hydrolysis, resulting in activated protein and promotion of cell growth and hence tumor growth. There is a class of proteins that deactivates ras by increasing GTP hydrolysis to GDP (GTPase-activating proteins).[26] There is evidence that alterations in GTPase-activating proteins are implicated in the development of sporadic BCC.

BASAL CELL CARCINOMA

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

BCC is the most common malignant tumor in the United States and in other areas with predominantly white populations. Approximately 900,000 cases per year are identified in the United States.[6]Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer, the incidence of BCC being more than 2% among men and that of SCC being approximately 1% among men.[27] The incidence of BCC has increased over the past decades in a manner similar to the increase in melanoma. It is estimated that the incidence of NMSC is increasing 2% to 3% yearly.[28] One study, conducted in New Hampshire, showed an annual increase in incidence of SCC of approximately 10% and of BCC of approximately 5%.[29] Cumulative UV exposure and, more important, severe sunburn during childhood and adolescence are risk factors for BCC.[30] Other associated risk factors are Fitzpatrick skin types 1 and 2, red hair, freckling in childhood, family history of skin cancer, male sex, and Celtic ancestry.[31] BCC is more common in lighter skinned African Americans than in darker persons.[32] Immunodeficiency secondary to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or transplantation also is associated with increased risk of BCC. Other uncommon risk factors include exposure to arsenic and ionizing radiation, especially among patients who have received radiation for acne.

Keratin pattern and immunohistochemical results suggest the origin of BCC is the outer root sheath of the hair follicle below the isthmus.[33] The locally invasive characteristic of BCC could be related to the presence of abnormal hemidesmosome-anchoring fibril complex.[34] Genetic abnormalities and mutations are thought to play a major role in development of BCC, especially in inherited syndromes of BCC. Patients with xeroderma pigmentosum cannot repair the UV-induced DNA mutations; therefore, they are at increased risk of cutaneous carcinogenesis. Mutations in the hedgehog signaling pathway genes and TP53 are important in the pathogenesis of sporadic BCC and those arising in patients with the nevoid BCC syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum. [11] [13] [35] [36] [37]

Clinical Manifestations

The most common location for BCC is the head and neck, especially the nose. BCC occurs on hair-bearing skin; mucosal surfaces are notinvolved. The major types of BCC include nodular, pigmented, superficial, and morpheaform. The typical nodular BCC is a dome-shaped, pearly papule with a telangiectatic surface and translucent rolled borders ( Fig. 74-1 ). The surface might become ulcerated ( Fig. 74-2 ). In darker skinned individuals, especially African Americans, the more darkly pigmented BCCs may be misdiagnosed as seborrheic keratosis or nodular melanoma. Superficial BCC is a well-demarcated erythematous scaly plaque with elevated borders that often occurs on the trunk or extremities. It might be confused with Bowen's disease or nummular eczema. The most difficult BCC to diagnose and manage is the morpheaform or sclerosing variant. This ill-defined, white, indurated plaque can be mistaken for a scar or localized patch of scleroderma and therefore is ignored by patient and physician, with resulting wide subclinical extension.

Figure 74-1 Typical presentation of basal cell carcinoma on the nose.

Figure 74-2 Ulcerated basal cell carcinoma with rolled borders on posterior ear.

Histopathology

In common nodular BCC, nodular masses of basaloid cells extend from the epidermis or outer root sheath into the dermis with surrounding connective tissue stroma ( Fig. 74-3 ). A palisade arrangement of cells is present in the periphery. Sometimes as a result of tumor necrosis and disintegration, cystic spaces form. The surrounding stroma may retract from the tumor mass forming the typical lacunae, a sign that aids in diagnosis. In the pigmented type of BCC, large amounts of melanin are produced in the melanocytes that colonize the tumor. The many melanophages in the surrounding stroma also contribute to pigmentation. The superficial type of BCC shows multifocal small nests of basaloid tumor cells budding off the epidermis and adnexa. Morpheaform BCC is different in that strands of tumor cells are embedded in a dense fibrous tissue stroma. These strands often extend in the deeper dermis. Micronodular BCCs contain small nodules of tumor cells that invade surrounding stroma. The morpheaform and micronodular types are generally the most locally invasive variants of BCC. It is common for BCCs to show mixed histologic patterns of these various types. Even the less invasive variants may invade deeply when located in regions of embryonic fusion planes, such as around the nose and ears.

Figure 74-3 Histopathology of basal cell carcinoma. (From Skarin AK [ed]: Atlas of Diagnostic Oncology, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 2003, p 374.)



Treatment

BCC is rarely metastatic but can be locally invasive ( Fig. 74-4 ). Therefore, eradicating the primary tumor is the goal of therapy. Several treatment options are available, both surgical and nonsurgical. Selection depends on the tumor type, patient profile, size and location of tumor, recurrence, physician's experience, and patient preference. Surgical modalities include Mohs’ micrographic surgery, surgical excision, cryosurgery, and electrodessication and curettage (EDC).[32] Nonsurgical options include radiation therapy and photodynamic therapy.[38] Other treatment modalities, such as immunotherapy with intralesional interferon[39] and topical 5% imiquimod (Aldara),[40] chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil,[41] and retinoids,[42] have been reported with variable success ( Fig. 74-5 ).

Figure 74-4 Basal cell carcinoma of 10 years’ duration invading the scapula.

Figure 74-5 Treatment for basal cell carcinoma. EDC, electrodesiccation and curettage; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; PDT, photodynamic therapy; XRT, radiation therapy.

A systematic review of studies in which investigators reported recurrence rates of BCC after different treatment modalities showed that the mean 5-year recurrence rates after Mohs’ surgery and surgical excision were approximately 1% and 5.3%, respectively.[43] Risk factors for BCC recurrence include greatest dimension larger than 2 cm, location in the midface (H zone) or ear, morpheaform or other aggressive histologic pattern, and long duration.[44] These tumors should be completely resected, preferably by Mohs’ technique or excision with margin control. Mohs’ surgery should be used in areas where preserving maximum tissue is important, such as eyelids, nose, and lips. It is also indicated for recurrent BCC and tumors with ill-defined clinical margins. If simple excision is used, the margin for excision should be at least 4 mm around tumors of 1 cm or less and 5 to 10 mm for tumors larger than 1 cm.[45] If there are contraindications to surgery, or the tumor is small and located on less critical sites such as the trunk, cryotherapy or EDC can be used with good outcome. Because of the less favorable long-term cosmetic results and possibility of secondary radiation-induced skin cancer, radiation therapy is best avoided in the care of relatively young patients. Very large or poorly controlled BCC may necessitate a coordinated approach of standard surgical excision, Mohs’ surgery, radiation therapy, and immunotherapy or chemotherapy.[46]

Prognosis and Follow-up Evaluation

The prognosis of BCC is generally good. Metastasis is rare, and tumor growth is slow. Two thirds of recurrences occur during the fist 3 years after treatment.[47] The risk of development of another BCC is approximately 45% within 5 years.[48] The risk of development of another NMSC is associated with the number of previous NMSCs. In an Australian study of patients with three to nine previous NMSCs, the risk of development of a new cancer was 93%.[49] Patients treated for BCC need to be examined at least once a year for the first few years, preferably for 5 years after the last cancer was diagnosed. For patients with a history of multiple skin cancers, more frequent follow-up examinations are recommended. Photoprotection starting at a young age is advised to reduce the cumulative damage induced by the sun.

SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AND BOWEN'S DISEASE

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

SCC is a malignant tumor of keratinocytes of the skin or mucosal surfaces. SCC has greater metastatic potential than BCC and causes the majority of NMSC deaths. SCC can arise de novo or from a precursor like actinic keratosis. Bowen's disease is a SCC in situ arising de novo. If Bowen's disease occurs on the glans penis or rarely vulva it is referred as erythroplasia of Queyrat. Bowen's disease can slowly progress into invasive SCC.

SCC is the second most common skin cancer in the United States, representing about 20% of NMSCs. Interestingly, SCC occurs more than BCC in blacks and Asians.[50] It is more common in men than women.[6] There are many risk factors for SCC, the most important being solar radiation. The incidence of SCC is increasing especially on the head and neck area as a result of exposure to sunlight.[51]SCC is thought to be correlated with recent (in the 10 years preceding diagnosis) chronic sunlight exposure[52] and cumulative sun exposure.[53] Phototherapy with PUVA (psoralen + ultraviolet A) increases the risk of SCC. Other risk factors for SCC include fair skin, red hair, albinism, and Celtic origin. Nonsolar risk factors include exposure to chemicals (insecticides and herbicides),[54] arsenic, organic hydrocarbons, chronic thermal injury and scars, ionizing radiation, and chronic immunosuppresion.[55] SCC is increased 18 to 36 times in organ transplant patients.[56] This increase of risk is correlated with the type of organ transplantation and elapsed time after transplantation. Heart transplant recipients have a higher risk of NMSC than kidney transplant recipients, possibly because of more intense immunosuppression.[57] Tobacco is a risk factor for oral SCC. Viruses, especially human papillomavirus (HPV), have been linked to epithelial malignancies including SCC. This is especially true among patients with epidermodysplasia verruciformis, who have an underlying immunodeficiency and can develop SCCs within HPV-infected warts.[55]

Carcinogens such as ultraviolet radiation (UVR), certain chemicals and viruses play a role in the pathogenesis of SCC by damaging keratinocyte DNA and other cellular contents. It is known that UVR, especially UVB, causes mutations in DNA of keratinocytes.[58] Early repair of these mutations is important for the prevention of SCC. Patients with NMSC are thought to have decreased ability for DNA repair compared with controls, thus making them more susceptible to the effects of UVR.[59] One example is the effect of UVR on DNA alterations in patients with xeroderma pigmentosum who are genetically unable to repair these defects. UVR also causes cutaneous immunosuppression, weakening the host's immune response against tumor cells and promoting tumor growth. [60] [61] Studies of SCCs have shown that mutations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene are an early event. [2] [62] Most of the mutations occur at dipyrimidine sequences, in the form of UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers.[63] The development of SCC does not occur by a simple single step, but rather through a multistage process. Conversion of susceptible keratinocytes to premalignant cells and then progression to carcinoma occurs as a result of successive genetic hits.[64] In the initiation stage of carcinogenesis there is clonal expansion of premalignant cells. The next stage is increased proliferation of premalignant cells and subsequent chromosomal aberrations. The final stage is conversion to SCC. DNA aneuploidy with a single peak was detected by flow cytometry in lesions of Bowen's disease, suggesting a monoclonal proliferation of abnormal keratinocytes and a clonal basis for skin cancer.[65] Aberrant expression of P-cadherin, and changes in expressions of cytokeratins and transforming growth factors all play a role in tumor progression.[66]

Clinical Manifestations

SCC occurs more on the head and neck area in whites, but in blacks there is no predilection for sun-exposed areas of the body.[67] SCC in situ may develop from premalignant lesions such as actinic keratosis or arsenical keratosis. In fact, in whites the majority of SCCs arise from actinic keratoses. These can eventually spread beyond the epidermis and become invasive. Invasive SCC can also arise from normal skin. It starts as a small, firm, dull red nodule, which can undergo central ulceration. Sometimes if SCC arises from solar keratosis an adherent keratotic scale can be seen. If ignored, the lesion grows horizontally and vertically and may become fixed to the underlying tissue. The surface might become ulcerated with bleeding, malodorous exudate or crust. The borders are usually elevated and firm. Occasionally a fungoid lesion without ulceration can be seen. SCC of the lower lip often arises from previously solar-damaged areas (actinic cheilitis). Initially local thickening of the vermilion border occurs that then progresses into a noduloulcerative lesion ( Fig. 74-6 ). Persistent subungual erythema with pain and swelling should alert the physician for SCC of the nail region. This form of SCC may be confused with warts ( Fig. 74-7 ). As mentioned earlier, SCCs can arise from chronic sinuses, scars, and chronic thermal damage.

Figure 74-6 Squamous cell carcinoma of the lip of 5 years’ duration.

Figure 74-7 Squamous cell carcinoma of the nail bed. Patient was being treated for a wart.

Verrucous carcinoma is a distinct slow-growing low-grade type of SCC. The most common location is the plantar foot (epithelioma cuniculatum) but it can occur on the buttocks, genitals (giant condyloma of Buschke and Löwenstein), face, oral cavity (oral florid papillomatosis), trunk, nails, and extremities. It grows as an exophytic verrucous mass. Clinically, on the foot it can be mistaken for a plantar wart. It is locally aggressive and may penetrate into deep soft tissue or bone.

Bowen's disease often appears as a well-defined single red plaque with dry surface scaling. Lesions are slow growing and asymptomatic, thus ignored by many patients. The physician might initially treat it as psoriasis or nummular eczema with no response. There is a 3% to 5% chance that Bowen's disease can progress into invasive SCC.[68] Clinically erythroplasia of Queyrat resembles Bowen's disease butlacks the dry superficial scale. Instead the surface is moist and smooth.

The risk of metastasis of SCC is variable, depending on the site and tumor characteristics. The deeper and larger the tumor, the higher is the chance of metastasis. Recurrent tumors are at high risk for metastasis. Lesions with perineural involvement have a 35% metastatic rate.[69] Among the different histologic types, desmoplastic SCCs are more likely to metastasize.[70] The risk of metastasis of SCC derived from actinic keratosis is low (0.5% to 3.7%) compared with SCC arising in radiation-induced SCC and chronic osteomyelitis (20% and 31%, respectively). [71] [72] High-risk areas for metastasis include tumors arising from the dorsal hands, lips, ears, and penis. For example, SCC of the lower lip has a 15% risk of metastasis.[73] Bowen's disease and erythroplasia of Queyrat also have a low chance of metastasis, but once they become invasive the risk of metastasis increases significantly.

Histopathology

A deep shave or punch biopsy that includes the base of the tumor is needed to distinguish SCC in situ from invasive SCC. Bowen's disease is carcinoma in situ. The stratum corneum is thickened, and epidermis is hyperplastic with disordered maturation of keratinocytes. Mitotic figures, mutinucleated keratinocytes, and dyskeratotic cells with hyperchromatic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm are seen in the epidermis. The histology of SCC shows masses of epidermal cells proliferating into the dermis. Atypical squamous cells and mitotic figures are seen ( Fig. 74-8 ). The cells have abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and large nuclei. Horn pearls, which are a result of keratinization of squamous cells, are seen. The dermis may show a marked inflammatory reaction. Spindle cell SCC is a rare variant composed of mainly spindle cells, but some squamous differentiation may be seen. Spindle cells have large vesicular nuclei and scant cytoplasm and intermingle with the collagenous stroma. Spindle cell SCC is poorly differentiated with numerous mitoses and deep invasion and requires immunohistochemistry to differentiate it from other spindle cell tumors. Another uncommon histologic variant of SCC is the acantholytic or adenoid SCC, seen more on the face and neck. There are nests of tumor cells with dyskeratotic cells and central acantholysis forming pseudoglandular structures.

Figure 74-8 Histopathology of squamous cell carcinoma. (From Skarin AK [ed]: Atlas of Diagnostic Oncology, 3rd ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 2003, p 376.)



Treatment

The treatment options for SCC are similar to BCC treatment, with some differences ( Fig. 74-9 ). The first step is to estimate the peripheral and vertical extension of tumor cells. Tumors at high risk for local or distant spread are those larger than 2 cm or deeper than 6 mm, recurrent tumors, poorly differentiated tumors, and those with perineural invasion or arising in immunocompromised hosts.[74] Second, the patient should be evaluated for metastasis to the lymph nodes and other organs.

Figure 74-9 Treatment for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). EDC, electrodesiccation and curettage; 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; PDT, photodynamic therapy; XRT, radiation therapy.

Destructive methods or surgical excision can treat Bowen's disease effectively. Small uncomplicated SCCs (<1 cm) in low-risk locations are frequently treated with EDC. Cryotherapy is an alternative treatment. Simple surgical excision with margin control is commonly used for smaller tumors and those on the trunk and extremities. The recommended margin for low-risk SCC is 4 mm and for high-risk tumor is 6 mm.[75] The excision should include the subcutaneous fat. Mohs’ micrographic surgery is the treatment of choice for high-risk SCCs or for tissue preservation where tissue sparing is cosmetically or functionally vital.[76] Aggressive or deeply invasive SCCs are treated with deep surgical excision with margin control when practical. Mohs’ surgery may be helpful in delineating critical areas in massive tumors or tumors with ill-defined borders. SCC invading surrounding structures such as bone and cartilage must also be excised. Tumors with neural or perineural involvement that are at high risk of recurrence should be completely excised preferably with the Mohs’ technique. High-risk tumors may require adjuvant therapy with radiation therapy[77] or chemotherapy. [78] [79]

Radiation can also be used as a primary choice of treatment. Usually 4000 cGy of radiation is given in 5 to 16 fractions. This form of treatment might be appropriate in the elderly at high risk for surgical complications or other patients with contraindications to anesthesia or surgery. Radiation can be useful to treat tumors on the eyelids, nose, ears, and lips when surgery is not practical. The disadvantages are the cost, blind margin control, and prolonged treatment duration. The cure rate for tumors larger than 2 cm is about 85% to 95%.[80] Radiation therapy is best avoided in treating verrucous carcinomas and younger patients because of poor long-term cosmetic results. SCCs that have arisen from ulcers, scars, and irradiated sites are better removed by margin-controlled surgery than by radiation therapy.

If lymph node metastasis has occurred, treatment is wide surgical resection of tumor with regional lymph node dissection with or without adjunctive radiation. However, elective lymph node dissection is not commonly performed in the absence of evidence for regional spread. Sentinel lymph node biopsy may be considered.[81]

For patients with Bowen's disease or advanced SCC, chemotherapy with isotretinoin alone or in combination with a interferon has been used with success. [82] [83] Promising chemopreventive agents for lesions in the actinic keratosis–SCC spectrum include retinoids, COX-2 inhibitors, and difluoromethylornithine.

Prognosis and Follow-Up

SCCs in general have a greater potential for recurrence and metastasis than BCCs; therefore, the follow-up must be more aggressive. The patient should be followed at close intervals (every 3–6 months) for the first several years, depending on the location, size, aggressiveness, and node status of the primary tumor. The exception would be small SCCs arising from actinic keratoses on sun-exposed surfaces, where the rate of metastasis is very small (0.5%). In these patients, routine follow-up every 6 to 12 months is all that is required.

KERATOACANTHOMA

Keratoacanthomas are common cutaneous neoplasms that are thought to derive from the infundibular portion of hair follicles. They most often present as solitary rapidly growing, pink or flesh-colored, dome-shaped, or cratiform nodules. They occur most commonly on sun-exposed areas in fair-skinned elderly individuals. Keratoacanthomas are historically characterized by their spontaneous involution over several months with residual atrophic scarring and local tissue destruction. Histologically, a mature keratoacanthoma has a distinctive architecture characterized by a keratin-filled crater lined by a proliferating squamous epithelium with abundant pale eosinophilic “glassy” cytoplasm, epithelial lipping, and multiple keratin horn pearls with central orthokeratosis. Cytology is often indistinguishable from that of a well-differentiated cystic SCC. At the base of the tumor, islands and strands of atypical cells may invade the dermis. Frequently there is a heavy inflammatory infiltrate at the base of the lesion comprising lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils. Atypical mitoses as well as perineural and perivascular invasion may also be present, particularly in tumors involving the head and neck. Several cases of highly aggressive and metastatic keratoacanthomas have also been reported; however, some have questioned whether these were truly keratoacanthomas or rather keratoacanthoma-like SCCs.[84]

Although most cases of keratoacanthoma are solitary, subsets of individuals with multiple keratoacanthomas have been described. These include the familial Ferguson Smith type comprising multiple keratoacanthomas at an early age, and the generalized eruption of thousands of small keratoacanthomas as described by Grzybowski (see ref. 84). Keratoacanthomas frequently occur in individuals with the Muir-Torre syndrome, xeroderma pigmentosum, and solid-organ transplantation.[85] They also occur in areas of scarring from prior trauma, thermal burns, and surgical treatment, and in association with many benign conditions such as stasis dermatitis, lichen planus, lichen simplex chronicus, psoriasis, and discoid lupus erythematosus.

Debate exists as to whether keratoacanthomas are a distinct clinical entity or a subtype of well-differentiated SCC. Significant efforts have been made to find practical, reliable criteria to distinguish keratoacanthoma from SCC, but none have yielded reliable criteria for routinely distinguishing these entities. Recent studies with the apoptotic marker P2X7 and with comparative genomic hybridization suggest that keratoacanthoma and SCC possess distinct genetic aberrations that result in separate developmental pathways. [86] [87] These findings may provide an avenue in the future for reliable separation of keratoacanthoma and SCC. However, given the potential for local destruction and metastatic disease, it is recommended that keratoacanthomas be treated in the same manner as SCCs. Complete conservative excision is the most common treatment technique for keratoacanthomas. Radiotherapy, EDC, systemic medications, and topical and intralesional modalities have been reported with varying success.

NONMELANOMA SKIN CANCER IN IMMUNOCOMPROMISED HOSTS

The incidence of NMSC is significantly increased in patients who are immunocompromised secondary to human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, heritable immunodeficiencies, the effective immunosuppression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and immunosuppressive medications. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection, congenital immunodeficiency, and lymphoma manifest decreased immunosurveillance due to defects in cell-mediated immunity. An increased susceptibility to infection with oncogenic HPV types may be important in the pathogenesis of Bowen's disease (SCC in situ), SCC, keratoacanthomas, and genital dysplasias in these patients.[88] Epidermodysplasia verruciformis is a rare inherited disorder of unknown etiology that predisposes those affected to widespread infection with HPV types 5 and 8, which is associated with the development of SCC. A history of UV exposure further compounds the risk in these populations.[89]

Iatrogenic immunosuppression, an important treatment modality for autoimmune diseases and for prevention of transplant rejection, is associated with both direct carcinogenic effects and decreased immunosurveillance. Solid-organ transplant recipients (OTRs) require long-term immunosuppression and, therefore, are at increased risk for BCC, melanoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and especially SCC over their lifetime. The highest incidence is seen in heart transplantation followed by renal and then liver transplantation. The impact on public health is significant, in that more than 25,000 solid-organ transplants are performed in the United States annually, the majority being renal, and survival rates for OTRs are increasing. In OTRs, SCC can be more aggressive and the SCC/BCC ratio is increased.[90]

Factors associated with SCC in OTRs include sun exposure, epidermodysplasia verruciformis-associated HPV types 5 and 8, fair skin, heart transplant, older age at transplant, male sex, and intense immunosuppression. Indeed, intensity and duration of immunosuppression have been associated with development of aggressive SCC.[89] Studies suggest that antirejection therapies using tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, or rapamycin versus cyclosporine, glucocorticoids, or azathioprine may decrease incidence of NMSC in OTRs. [89] [91]

The burden of skin cancer, especially SCC, is markedly elevated in OTRs. The magnitude and severity of disease can be devastating.[90] Many are diagnosed with numerous lesions annually, each lesion with an increased potential for aggressive behavior and metastasis relative to occurrences in the general population.[92] Metastatic disease usually involves noncontiguous spread along lymphatic vessels and nerves, and represents a poor prognosis and therapeutic challenge.[93]

Management of NMSC in OTRs consists of the same treatment modalities described for NMSC in the general population. Increased vigilance including frequent follow-up, a high level of suspicion for new or changing skin lesions, and a low threshold for biopsy is essential to ensure early detection and timely treatment. By stratifying lesions as lower versus higher risk (rapid growth, large size, recurrence, aggressive histology, or location on lip, ear, or scalp), those lesions more likely to recur or metastasize can be prioritized in a treatment regimen in OTRs with an overwhelming burden of disease. [90] [93]Whereas topical agents, curettage, and cryotherapy may be appropriate for treatment of lower risk lesions, higher risk lesions usually require a surgical approach (excision or Mohs’ micrographic surgery) to ensure clear margins. Radiation therapy can be an important adjunct for metastatic and perineural disease. Although the diagnostic and therapeutic role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in such cases is not established, it may be considered in selected high-risk cases. [89] [90]

Data suggest that acitretin may be beneficial as a chemopreventive agent in this population. Moreover, reducing immunosuppressive therapy has been shown to decrease the development of NMSC and metastatic disease, although coordination with the primary transplant physician is essential to avoid allograft rejection. [89] [90]

SEBACEOUS CARCINOMA

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

Sebaceous carcinoma is a rare, potentially devastating tumor derived from the adnexal epithelium of sebaceous glands. Principally, the tumor occurs in two different clinical scenarios: ocular sebaceous carcinoma (OSC) and extraocular sebaceous carcinoma. [94] [95] OSC accounts for 0.2% to 0.8% of all eyelid tumors and 1% to 1.5% of all malignant tumors of the eyelid. Approximately 400 cases have been described in the English literature.[96] OSC affects women 1.5 times more frequently than men; however, a slight male preponderance occurs in cases of extraocular sebaceous carcinoma. [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] The mean age at diagnosis is 65 years (range, 40–60 years), but OSC has been reported in young children (12 years of age, after radiation therapy for retinoblastoma) and in persons as old as 90 years. [102] [103] Sebaceous carcinoma seems to have a higher incidence in the Asian population. [102] [104] [105] [106] This tumor has been associated with MTS, an autosomal dominant disorder of mismatch repair genes characterized by sebaceous tumors (benign and malignant) as well as other visceral malignant tumors. [20] [107] Sebaceous carcinoma with microsatellite instability has been found in several renal organ transplant recipients.[107]

Clinical Manifestations

OSC typically manifests as a painless, slowly growing, yellowish papule ( Fig. 74-10 ). The upper lid is affected two to three times more frequently than the lower lid. The tumor usually originates from the meibomian gland (sebaceous gland in the tarsus) or from a sebaceous gland of the eyelash (glands of Zeis). [101] [103] Clinically, the signs can be subtle with only moderate lid thickening, eyelash alopecia, pale corneal changes, conjunctival injection, or thickening along the temporal or inferior temporal limbus. [97] [108] [109] [110] There have been case reports of ipsilateral upper and lower eyelid involvement and bilateral upper and lower lid involvement. [96] [109] [111] The diagnosis is often elusive, because OSC is notorious for masquerading as more common ocular disorders, such as chalazion (most common), keratoconjunctivitis, blepharoconjunctivitis, SCC, BCC, granulomatous disorders, and benign neoplasms. [97] [109] [110] [111] [112] Initial recognition is 50% among ophthalmologists and only 18.6% among general practitioners. [113] [114] [115] Often there is a delay in diagnosis of 6 months to a year and in some series up to 2.9 years, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. [97] [113] With regard to the rarer extraocular sebaceous gland carcinoma, initial diagnosis can be elusive because the clinical appearance often is pleomorphic and nonspecific and varies from a banal-appearing nodule to large ulcerating masses. [116] [117] [118] [119] This variant of sebaceous gland carcinoma most often occurs on the head and neck region, reflecting the abundance of sebaceous glands there.

Figure 74-10 Ocular sebaceous carcinoma involving the lower eyelid.

Histopathology

Full-thickness biopsy is required to ensure adequate tissue sampling. Microscopic examination shows that OSC invades surrounding tissue by direct extension into the dermis or the overlying epithelium.[113] [120] [121] The tumor demonstrates epitheliotropic spread in 37% to 80% of cases. Atypical sebaceous cells have a pagetoid distribution within the conjunctival epithelium. [103] [113] As many as 18% of cases of OSC may have multifocal regions of tumor involvement.[96]

There are basically two broad classification schemes with regard to light microscopic findings. Font[122] described three classes of tumor based on degree of differentiation: well differentiated, moderately well differentiated, and poorly differentiated. Others prefer to classify the tumor on the basis of growth pattern: lobular, comedocarcinoma, papillary, and mixed.[100] The intraepithelial neoplasia growth pattern and pagetoid spread are not addressed in this classification scheme. The histologic features are anaplastic cells with varying degrees of differentiation. Squamoid or basaloid features may be present.[97] Lobulated aggregates of basaloid cells usually contain irregular, hyperchromatic nuclei and vacuolated cytoplasm. [96] [109] [123] [124] In cases of intraepithelial neoplasia, the epithelial pagetoid cells lack intercellular bridges and contain large hyperchromatic nuclei, prominent nucleoli, and abundant, pale-staining cytoplasm. Special stains, such as oil red O or Sudan black, often are helpful in delineating the atypical sebocytes; however, poorly differentiated tumors may not stain positively for lipids. [110] [113] In addition, undifferentiated sebocytes often lack the foamy cytoplasm of their more differentiated counterparts and may resemble atypical SCC at standard hematoxylin and eosin staining. [97] [109] [123] Recognition of this particular biphasic nature of OSC is critical to appreciating the biologic behavior of this recalcitrant tumor. Ophthalmologists have known for years about the difficulty of assessing the tumor margins of this epitheliotropic neoplasm. It has been recommended that as many as nine mucosal biopsy specimens be obtained and mapped from the medial and lateral portions of the bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva of the upper and lower lids. [125] [126]

Treatment

Evaluation of patients with known or suspected sebaceous gland carcinoma includes complete history with review of systems, family history and consideration of MTS, complete skin examination, and palpation of nodal basins and structures adjacent to the lesion. A chest radiograph, complete blood cell count, liver function tests, and electrolytes are recommended. If MTS is a consideration, colonoscopy is warranted.

Management of sebaceous gland carcinoma is primarily surgical, although there are a few reports of tumors managed primarily with radiation.[127] Given the paucity of cases, no randomized, controlled studies have been conducted to evaluate therapy. Traditionally, wide local excision with a margin of 4 to 6 mm of clinically normal tissue has been used.[97] Exenteration is recommended for extensive bulbar conjunctival involvement or evidence of orbital invasion.[101] In his personal series of 60 consecutive patients with a mean follow-up of 41 months, Shields and colleagues reported a local recurrence rate of 18%, exenteration of 13%, and metastasis of 8%.[113] Some experts consider Mohs’ micrographic surgical technique the treatment of choice, because it preserves the maximum amount of healthy tissue. This quality is especially crucial in the treatment of ocular tissue. [109] [113] [128] [129] [130] [131] In addition, it allows for microscopic examination of all margins of the obtained tissue to ensure complete tumor eradication. In 2002, we reported our results of nine cases treated by Mohs’ micrographic surgery achieving a 90% success rate with 3-year follow-up.[118] Four of these patients have now gone 5 years without evidence of local recurrence in all patients (unpublished data).

Local recurrence usually is the result of inadequate management of the primary tumor.[97] If the recurrent lesion is small enough, treatment can be repeated with Mohs’ micrographic surgery or local excision.[113] More extensive OSC tumor involvement usually necessitates exenteration. [115] [124] Ophthalmologists have considered cryotherapy a useful modality in the management of epibulbar disease in a small subset of patients, and this therapy may be an alternative to exenteration. [105] [132] [133] Regional lymph node metastasis is managed by surgical resection and adjuvant radiation.

Prognosis and Follow-up Evaluation

Both OSC and extraocular sebaceous gland carcinoma are aggressive tumors that recur locally if inadequately managed and readily metastasize. Metastasis may occur through lymphatic vessels, and in the case of OSC, it is postulated to occur through the lacrimal and excretory systems.[97] Risk factors associated with poor prognosis include duration longer than 6 months; vascular or lymphatic involvement; orbital extension; poorly differentiated tumor morphology; multicentricity; pagetoid spread into the conjunctival epithelium, cornea, or skin; upper and lower lid involvement; and history of radiation exposure. [102] [103] [109] [113] In the past, 14% to 25% of patients reportedly had metastasis, most frequently involving regional nodal basins, followed by spread to the liver, lung, brain, and bones. [97] [99] [100] [101] [102] Because of increased index of suspicion, physician education, and earlier recognition with biopsy, the metastatic rate has decreased to 10% in some series.[113] Among industrialized countries, periocular mortality is reportedly 9% to 15%. Systemic disease is associated with a grave prognosis.

Follow-up care includes examining the individual on a regular basis, probably for the rest of his or her life. Given the complex issues in dealing with this aggressive tumor, individuals are best served by being cared for in a tertiary care setting with a multidisciplinary approach. Physical examination, evaluation of the surgical site, and a low threshold for biopsy of suspicious lesions is a reasonable approach.

MERKEL CELL CARCINOMA

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare aggressive tumor of unknown incidence. Fewer than 700 cases have been reported since the tumor was first described by Toker in 1972. [134] [135] Many names have been ascribed to this neoplasm, including primary small cell carcinoma of the skin, trabecular carcinoma, APUDoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, endocrine carcinoma, and primary undifferentiated tumor of the skin. [135] [136] [137] [138] New SEER data indicates that the incidence of MCC is rising with about 470 new cases reported annually.[139]

MCC is a tumor that primarily affects elderly persons. Ninety percent of cases reported occur in patients older than 50 years, and the mean age at diagnosis is 69 years. [135] [138] [139] There does not appear to be a sex predilection.[140] White persons are more frequently affected than those of other races; however, MCC has been reported among Asian and black persons. [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] MCC has been reported in association with BCC, SCC, a history of radiation exposure, certain familial cancer syndromes, and immunosuppressed states [121] [142] [146] [147] [148] such as OTRs.[149]

Clinical Manifestations

MCC often manifests as a painless, indurated, erythematous to violaceous nodule on sun-damaged skin, 50% of tumors arising on the head and neck. [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [142] [150] Ten percent of these tumors are in the periocular areas ( Fig. 74-11 ).[151] The extremities are the second most affected site, followed by the trunk. [136] [141] [152] [153] MCC also has been reported in areas not normally exposed to sunlight, such as the vulva, endocervix, penis, esophagus, bladder, and calvarium. [154] [155] [156] [157] [158] The overlying epidermis usually is unremarkable; however, ulceration may be found.[138] [142] [159] In addition, there may be overlying or surrounding telangiectasis.[135] The clinical differential diagnosis includes BCC, SCC, amelanotic melanoma, lymphoma, and metastatic disease. The ultimate diagnosis is made on the basis of clinical appearance, histologic findings, and supporting immunohistochemical studies of the tissue subjected to biopsy.

Figure 74-11 Merkel cell carcinoma involving the upper eyelid.

Histopathology

MCC has a histologic appearance similar to that of other small cell neoplasms and must be differentiated from cutaneous metastatic lesions from carcinoid or small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the lung. [135] [137] [142] [159] The tumor cells are characteristically uniform in size, monomorphic, basophilic, and ovoid, and measure up to 15 mm in diameter. The nuclei have finely dispersed chromatin with minimal surrounding cytoplasm. [137] [152] [159] [160] [161] Pathognomonic features include numerous mitotic figures, vesicular nuclei with essentially inconspicuous nucleoli, and apoptosis, especially when appreciated with certain architectural features. [135] [137] [162] The tumor involves the dermis, may extend into the subcutaneous fat or deeper, and usually spares the epidermis.[142] There may be a pagetoid pattern of epidermal spreading, which can mimic Bowen's disease, Paget's disease, extramammary Paget's disease, melanoma, and mycosis fungoides. [150] [162] MCC also may have both squamous and adnexal differentiation. [138] [161]

The architectural patterns of MCC have been classified into three separate groups: trabecular, intermediate cell, and small cell.[137] The trabecular pattern is the least common. [134] [163] [164] The cells are arranged in cords admixed among a fibrovascular background. [134] [136] [160] This pattern may be associated with pseudoglandular structures. [164] [165] The tumor often involves tissue surrounding adnexal structures, such as hair follicles. More often, in the intermediate cell type, MCC displays large sheets or clusters of uniform cells with foci of necrosis.[136] The tumor also can arise near adnexal structures and connect with the epidermis. [164] [165] The cells in this pattern are less compact than those in the trabecular type. There often is a surrounding lymphocytic infiltrate. [135] [162] [163] [164] [165] [166]

Finally, the small cell type of MCC arises in the dermis and appears as sheets of cells interrupted by strands of connective tissue.[164] Glandular or pseudoglandular structures are absent. The cells are round and small and may demonstrate “crush” artifact. It has been proposed that the intermediate cell type and the small cell type behave in a clinically more aggressive manner than the trabecular type. [164] [165]Lymphatic invasion is frequently encountered and has negative prognostic implications. [137] [142] [163] [164] [166] [167]

Immunohistochemical studies aid in the diagnosis of MCC and help to differentiate it from other tumors. A characteristic paranuclear dotlike pattern against cytokeratin 20 is probably the most useful immunohistochemical stain. [135] [164] [168] [169] In addition, MCC stains positively for neuron-specific enolase. [136] [160] [164] [168] However, neuron-specific enolase is not specific for MCC and cannot be relied on for differentiation of MCC from small cell carcinoma of the lung. [135] [169] Chromogranin A and synaptophysin are specific for MCC but less sensitive than neuron-specific enolase. MCC also stains positively for epithelial membrane antigen and Ber-EP4. [135] [160] [169]

Treatment

When MCC is diagnosed, a detailed history should be obtained and a physical examination performed with emphasis on the skin and lymph nodes. Complete blood cell count and hepatic and renal function tests are reasonable. Evaluation of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis with computed tomography may be useful in differentiating MCC from metastatic small cell carcinoma and for initial staging.[150]Individuals with MCC of the head and neck region need imaging for evaluation of draining nodal basins, especially if there is clinically evident lymphadenopathy. [135] [150] Tumor staging is performed at clinical presentation.[170] Stage I disease is a primary tumor with no evidence of nodal involvement. Stage II disease equates to regional lymph node involvement. Stage III disease is defined by the presence of systemic metastasis.

Local disease is best managed by surgical excision to lower the tumor burden, and excision is followed by radiation. [139] [141] [150] [166] [170] Wide local excision of 2.5- to 3.0-cm margins is especially suitable for MCC of the trunk or extremity, being the historical standard. [135] [139] [141] [150] [166] [170] The use of Mohs’ micrographic surgery for areas in which this goal would not be achievable, such as the face or neck, has been a logical extension of surgical therapy. [150] [171] In addition to tissue conservation, the technique allows microscopic examination of all margins. [150] [171]

Prophylactic or elective lymph node dissection in all patients has been advocated by some surgeons. [135] [136] [170] [172] Others suggest that sentinel lymph node biopsy for evaluation of draining lymph node basins would be a reasonable approach and avoid the morbidity of elective lymph node dissection. [137] [138] [139] Sentinel lymph node biopsy is best performed when the primary surgical site has been subjected to the least amount of manipulation. Thus far no studies have been conducted to compare the two methods. Elective lymph node dissection currently is recommended for large primary tumors, head and neck lesions, small cell subtype, and evidence of vascular or lymphatic invasion. [136] [139] [141] [153]

MCC is considered a radiosensitive tumor. Thus, radiation therapy has been used as adjuvant primary treatment when surgery is not an option and for palliation. [139] [140] [141] [142] [150] [170] [172] Use of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy has been advocated by many authorities. [139] [141] Current recommendations call for surgical management of the primary MCC followed by radiation to the primary site as well as the regional lymph node draining system. [141] [142] [150] [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [177] Adjuvant chemotherapy has not been studied in a controlled manner. Many cytotoxic regimens have been used, including cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, etoposide, doxorubicin, procarbazine, dacarbazine, streptozocin, and nitrogen mustard. [138] [139] [178] [179] [180] Review of the literature on adjuvant chemotherapy has not demonstrated clear clinical benefit regarding relapse or survival. [143] [146] [170] [176] [177] Chemotherapy has been used for salvage therapy in patients with systemic disease. [147] [170] [178] [179] [180] Most regimens involve two or three drugs, and results are modest at best. No large, randomized studies have been conducted because of the rarity of MCC.

Prognosis and Follow-up Evaluation

MCC has been compared to malignant melanoma because of its similar aggressive behavior. [138] [139] [174] The local recurrence rate is 26% to 44% after primary treatment. As many as 30% of patients have regional lymph node involvement at the time of diagnosis with a 55% rate of regional lymph node relapse after treatment and a 34% to 49% rate of distant metastasis. [139] [142] [150] [176] [177] [180] Survival rates reportedly are 68% for women and 36% for men at 3 years. [152] [179] Given the relative rarity of the tumor, no large multicenter randomized trials have been conducted to assess stage, treatment modality, recurrence rate, and overall survival. There have been reports of individuals with spontaneous resolution of MCC. [181] [182] [183]

Patients should be monitored closely for recurrence of locoregional or distant disease. Lymph node or distant metastatic disease has a uniformly grave prognosis; however, there may be a role for chemotherapy in prolonging survival. Almost all individuals with metastatic disease eventually die of the disease.

DERMATOFIBROSARCOMA PROTUBERANS

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

DFSP is an uncommon tumor of intermediate malignancy that arises in the dermis. It is a locally aggressive neoplasm with notoriously high recurrence rates even after wide local excision. In 1924, Darier and Ferrand[184] first described DFSP as a distinct clinicopathologic entity; however, it was Hoffman in 1925 who introduced the term dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.[185]

DFSP constitutes less than 1% of all malignant tumors. The estimated incidence is 0.8 to 5 cases per 1 million persons per year. [186] [187] [188] [189] [190] The tumor commonly occurs between 20 and 50 years of age, rare cases occurring in young children.[191] In addition, there have been a few reported cases of congenital DFSP. [191] [192] [193] [194] The sexes are affected equally; however, in some series there is a slight male preponderance. [186] [187] [188] [191] [195] Most reported cases of DFSP occur in white persons, but historically race rarely is mentioned. [186] [187] [188] [196] DFSP also occurs in African Americans and Asians. [191] [196] [197]

DFSP is not known to have a genetic or familial predisposition. [198] [199] The cause of DFSP is unknown. Chromosomal abnormalities consistent with a monoclonal origin have been found in several studies. [200] [201] Most frequently, these abnormalities include ring 22 chromosomes, ring chromosomes containing chromosome 17 sequences, abnormal clones, and t(2;7) translocations. [201] [202] [203] [204]Approximately 10% to 20% of patients report a history of antece-dent trauma. [186] [191] [199] [205] [206] There have been reports of DFSP arising in multiple immunization sites, burn scars, and surgical scars.[196] [207] [208] DFSP has been associated with pregnancy as well as long-term arsenic exposure, acanthosis nigricans, and acrodermatitis enteropathica. [186] [209] [210] [211]

Clinical Manifestations

DFSP usually manifests as a flesh-colored, firm, asymptomatic nodule or plaque ( Fig. 74-12 ). The tumor is firm to palpation, and a subcutaneous component often is appreciated. There may be fixation to overlying skin but rarely to deeper structures. Lesions associated with pigment are known as Bednar's tumors.[212] In addition to pigment, there may be red to violaceous erythema. Characteristically, DFSP initially manifests as a solitary nodule; however, there may be multiple primary lesions. The size typically ranges from 1 to 5 cm, but neglected lesions can be as large as 20 cm in diameter. [186] [188] [196]The lesion slowly enlarges in a relentless manner. Accelerated growth phases can result in nodularity or multiple outcroppings or protuberances. Ulceration occurs when the tumor erupts through the epidermis. Atypical clinical manifestations include sclerotic plaques with a morpheaform appearance.[213]

Figure 74-12 Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans involving the back. Central linear scar from previous partial excision is encircled by ink to highlight clinical margins of the lesion.

Approximately 50% to 60% of DFSP lesions occur on the trunk, 25% of those occurring on the chest and shoulders. [187] [188] [191] [196] Twenty percent to 30% arise on the proximal aspects of the extremities. [188] [189] [190] [191] Ten percent to 15% occur on the head and neck, the scalp being affected less than 5% of the time. [187] [188] [191] [196] In rare instances acral sites have been reported, mostly in young children and adolescents. [187] [191] [192] [214] Often there is a delay in diagnosis given the indolent and nonspecific features of the tumor. DFSP often is mistaken for lipoma, deep-seated epidermal cyst, scar, hypertrophic scar, keloid, dermatofibroma, nodular fasciitis, and insect bite. The diagnosis is confirmed with biopsy and microscopic examination of the tissue.

Histopathology

The histological features of DFSP often are easily recognized on low-power view. There is densely packed proliferation of monomorphic, bluish, spindle-shaped cells seated in and expanding the dermis. The overlying epidermis usually is normal appearing unless there has been invasion by the tumor. The central or nodular areas of the tumor demonstrate numerous spindle cells arranged in a characteristic “whirling, storiform or herringbone” configuration.[160] The lateral tumor margins have sharply pointed tumor cells and irregular strands dissecting between the native collagen bundles. Inferiorly, the DFSPcells invade downward within the fibrous septa that separate the adipose cells of the panniculus. The peripheral margins may have a deceptively bland appearance resembling normal collagen and making interpretation of tumor margins difficult.[188] Fascia, muscle, and underlying bone may be involved in long-standing lesions. [188] [191] [196] [200] Histological variants include DFSP with entirely myxomatous features (myxoid DFSP) and pigmented DFSP, also known as Bednar's tumor. [212] [214] [215] [216] This variant tends to occur more often in dark-skinned persons and accounts for approximately 1% to 5% of all cases of DFSP.[212] Bednar's tumor has the characteristic storiform pattern of spindle cells admixed with a variable amount of melanin-laden dendritic cells. Immunohistochemical studies that may be helpful include positive staining for CD34, a human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen. Unlike dermatofibroma, DFSP stains negatively for factor XIIIa.[160]

Treatment

After the diagnosis of DFSP has been confirmed, a complete history, review of systems, and physical examination with focus on the skin and structures contiguous with the tumor and palpation of lymph node basins are performed. Unless the physician suspects metastatic disease, extensive laboratory studies and radiological investigation are not indicated.

The traditional mainstay of therapy for DFSP has been surgical resection, specifically wide local excision with a margin of 2 to 4 cm of normal-appearing skin. [196] [217] [218] Unfortunately, the biological and histological features of the tumor coupled with the inability to clinically determine tumor margins account for exceptionally high recurrence rates with standard surgical therapy. Reported local recurrence rates are as high as 60% after standard surgical excision and 23% after wide local excision with margins greater than 4 cm.[217] Approximately 80% of local recurrences occur within 3 years.[186] [196] [201] Local recurrence after 10 years is rare but has been reported. [188] [191] Mohs’ micrographic surgery has been receiving greater recognition as a useful method of management of DFSP. [217] [218] [219] [220] [221] [222] [223] [224] [225] [226] The capability of microscopic examination of the entire specimen margins allows the surgeon to localize and excise the tumor in a precise manner. This method also allows for maximum conservation of tissue, a crucial factor in certain anatomic areas, such as the face, scalp, distal extremities, and genitalia. Results of several studies have suggested that Mohs’ micrographic surgery may be beneficial in the management of DFSP; however, few series have provided complete 5-year follow-up data. [217] [218] [219] [220] [221] [222] [223] [224] [225] [226] At the University of Wisconsin, Madison, 36 patients with DSFP were treated with Mohs’ micrographic surgery. Of these, 29 participated in follow-up study for 5 or more years (range, 5–20 years). As of this writing, there have been no local recurrences or cases of regional metastasis.[227] Recently, imatinib mesylate (Gleevec), an inhibitor of platelet-derived growth factor receptors, has shown promise for unresectable DFSP.[228]

Prognosis and Follow-up Evaluation

Although it is locally aggressive, DFSP rarely metastasizes. The overall rate of distant metastasis is approximately 5% and of regional metastasis is 1%.[195] In the past the causes of the higher rate of metastasis were probably inclusion of malignant fibrohistiocytoma (MFH) in the database and degeneration of DFSP to a more sarcomatous subtype with its subsequent increased risk of metastasis. [227] [228] [229] MFH is now understood to be a totally different entity from DFSP. Its cellular morphological characteristics and architecture have been clarified, and pathologists and dermatopathologists have reached consensus on the diagnostic criteria for MFH. The regional rate of metastasis of MFH is estimated to be greater than 50%. [160] [226] [227] [228]

Recommendations for patient follow-up care include physical examination every 3 to 6 months postoperatively for 3 years and then annually for life. Particular attention to evaluation of surgical site,regional lymph node palpation, and a complete review of systems is appropriate.

CUTANEOUS ANGIOSARCOMA

Epidemiology and Pathogenesis

Cutaneous angiosarcoma (CAS) is a rare, highly malignant, potentially lethal tumor originating from the dermal vasculature endothelium. Elderly persons are most commonly affected, and there is a 2 : 1 male predominance. [230] [231] [232] [233] White persons are affected most often, but CAS has been reported among other persons as well. [234] [235] With the exception of CAS associated with lymphedema, the cause of CAS is uncertain. Cases have been associated with history of trauma, radiation, herpes zoster, fistula of chronic osteomyelitis, vinyl chloride and arsenic oxide exposure, and arteriovenous fistula sites in renal transplant recipients. [230] [231] [236] [237] [238] [239] [240] [241] [242] [243] [244] [245] UV light exposure does not seem to be an inciting factor. Only a minority of patients with CAS have temporally associated skin cancer. [232] [233] [246]

Clinical Manifestations

Principal clinical patterns include (1) CAS of the scalp and face, (2) CAS associated with chronic lymphedema most commonly following mastectomy (Stewart-Treves syndrome), and (3) radiation-associated angiosarcoma, which is the least common variant. [230] [236] CAS of the scalp and face usually manifests as a painless, rapidly proliferating growth of the subcutaneous tissue plane ( Fig. 74-13 ). CAS of this pattern occurs 50% of the time on the scalp and 30% of the time on the face or neck. [230] [231] [232] [233] [237] [240] [246] The tumor may be firm or spongy to palpation, the overlying skin surface smoothened because of tumor distention of the underlying structures.[247] An ill-defined area of dusky to violaceous erythema resembling a bruise or healing contusion often is present. The tumor infiltrates the surrounding tissues in a centrifugal and multifocal manner. As a result tumor involvement extends much farther than the clinical appearance of the margins. Multiple lesions may be separated by an isthmus of normal-appearing skin found at initial presentation if the primary tumor is more than 6 cm in diameter. Long-standing CAS may develop superimposed tumors and nodules. Ulceration and bleeding are not characteristic unless the CAS is larger than 10 cm in diameter. Misdiagnosis is common given the subtlety and nonspecific nature of the clinical findings. Initial differential diagnoses include cellulitis, nonspecific inflammatory changes, fungal infection, trauma, andhemangioma. [230] [231] [247] Reported atypical clinical scenarios include rosacea-like signs and symptoms, chronic edema of the eyelids, xanthelasma-like lesions, and even recurrent angioedema. [235] [247] [248]

Figure 74-13 Cutaneous angiosarcoma involving the scalp. Ink highlights clinical margins of the lesion.

Because the prognosis of advanced CAS is poor, every effort should be made for early diagnosis and treatment. Favorable outcomes are more likely when the tumor (1) has been present for less than 6 months, (2) is less than 5 cm in size, and (3) is amenable to combined surgery and radiation therapy (e.g., CAS of the nose).[246]

In 1948, Stewart and Treves described six patients with postmastectomy chronic lymphedema in whom CAS developed in the affected extremity.[249] The estimated risk among postmastectomy patients who survive more than 5 years is approximately 0.5%.[250] The time interval between mastectomy and recognition of angiosarcoma ranges from 1 to 30 years with a mean duration of 10 years.[251]Clinically, the ipsilateral, upper inner aspect of the arm is a frequent site of early involvement. Less frequent are lesions distal to the elbow or on the chest wall that most often resemble a bruise or blotchy erythema. These color changes initially are attributed to trauma; however, rapid growth and induration often lead to ulceration and hemorrhage. Other causes of chronic lymphedema have been associated with development of angiosarcoma, including congenital lymphedema and postsurgical, post-traumatic, and infectious etiological factors. [251] [252] [253] [254] [255] [256] [257]

Histopathology

Histologically, CAS has essentially three different cell growth patterns: (1) angiomatous or well differentiated with obvious vasoformative activity, (2) spindle cell with a range of differentiation, and (3) undifferentiated or highly anaplastic. [246] [258] A single tumor may have all three growth patterns. [237] [246] [247] [258] The well-differentiated variant (angiomatous) is characterized by recapitulation of atypical endothelial cells lining irregular vascular channels. These atypical vessels are located throughout the dermis, dissect through the collagen, and surround but do not invade the adnexal structures. With time there is infiltration into the subcutaneous fat, muscle, and fascia. This particular variant is often poorly recognized initially with frozen sections. The vessels do not contain red blood cells, because hemolysis of the red blood cells during processing makes microscopic examination difficult. The spindle cell tumor variant forms dense cellular bundles that penetrate the dermis and underlying tissue.[246]Vascular channels are not easily recognized. The more anaplastic or undifferentiated CAS characteristically contains large, basophilic, pleomorphic polyhedral cells arranged in solid sheets or cords. [246] [258] The dermis and subcutaneous structures often are occupied by tumor. Immunohistochemical stains for endothelium-related markers such as CD34 antigen, factor VIII–related antigen, or Ulex europaeus agglutinin I lectin binding may be helpful. Negative cytokeratin staining is helpful for differentiating CAS from carcinoma. Negative staining results for S-100 help to differentiate the tumor from melanoma. [247] [258]

Treatment

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging have not been extremely helpful unless there has been marked bony invasion. [259] [260] Soft-tissue invasion of the tumor may be partially visualized, but the exact extent of the margins is poorly delineated because of the diffuse infiltrating nature of the tumor. Radiographic imaging is even more unreliable if the tumor is poorly appreciated microscopically. The peripheral margin of CAS may be partially assessed with random biopsies performed in a gridlike pattern circumferentially around the tumor.[246] Ideally, the biopsies should be full thickness of the skin and include the muscle and fascia if possible for complete assessment of the depth of the margin.

Traditional management of CAS has been wide local excision with a margin of 3 to 6 cm of normal-appearing skin. More recently, Mohs’ micrographic surgery with adjuvant radiation has been shown to produce favorable outcome. [246] [261] [262] [263] The Mohs’ technique combines the benefits of both fresh-tissue and fixed-tissue technique. Well-localized lesions are good candidates for the fresh-tissue technique, because a microscope can be used for identification of the tumor and excision of the entire lesion. After excision, zinc chloride fixative paste may be applied circumferentially around the surgical skin edges to stimulate an immune response around the operative site.[262] The final defect is repaired with a flap or skin graft.

For scalp lesions, orthovoltage or electron beam radiation with a curvilinear delivery system is administered over the entire scalp in a swimming cap distribution.[264] The region from the eyebrows to the occipital nuchal line is included, and both auricular-temporal sulci are encompassed. The curvilinear delivery system distributes the radiation equally to all parts of the scalp simultaneously. Thus are avoided overlapping and undertreatment of radiation sites that would otherwise accompany conventional flat-plate radiation when applied to curved surfaces, such as the scalp and forehead. Attention to these details of radiation treatment is essential, because CAS is resistant to most forms of surgical therapy, and chemotherapy has not been reported effective.

Recurrence of CAS of the scalp usually is the result of inadequate treatment of the primary tumor. [232] [246] Localized recurrence can be managed with radiation with a good response. [246] [261]Management of regional lymph node metastasis is surgical resection and adjuvant radiation. [232] [246] Systemic disease has a grave prognosis. Given the rarity of angiosarcoma, no single institution has enough experience to establish definitive treatment guidelines. Practical strategies include use of Mohs’ micrographic surgery combined with radiation, in the manner described earlier, for tumors less than 5 cm in diameter. For tumors larger than 5 cm, peripheral margin assessment (because of the multicentricity of the tumor spread), followed by orthovoltage or electron beam radiation should be considered.[246]

Prognosis and Follow-up Evaluation

The prognosis among patients with any form of angiosarcoma is uniformly poor. CAS of the scalp has an expected 5-year survival rate of less than 12%.[232] Histologic degree of differentiation, mitotic index, age, sex, location of primary lesion, and clinical appearance have no statistical bearing on survival. Tumor size has been found the only statistically significant indicator of prognosis. Lesions smaller than 5 cm correlate with improved survival at 5 years.[230] Another favorable indicator has been the presence of prominent lymphocytic infiltrate associated with the tumor. Local recurrence is common, and metastasis occurs hematogenously and through lymphatic vessels to the cervical lymph nodes, lungs, liver, and soft tissues. [232] [234] There have been rare reports of spontaneous regression of CAS of the scalp and face. [265] [266] Complete regression in one unreported case at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, was associated with frequent application of hot compresses.

Follow-up recommendations include frequent physical examinations with particular attention to the surgical site, contiguous structures, and palpation of lymph nodes. A complete review of systems, laboratory data, and radiologic studies should be performed as indicated. These individuals are best treated in a tertiary care center with a multidisciplinary approach.

BEST PRACTICES FOR PATIENT SCREENING AND TUMOR PREVENTION

A full-body skin examination is advised as part of an annual physical, especially for older adults or those with a family history of skin cancer. For those with a personal history of skin cancer, examination every 4 to 6 months is advised. For NMSC, special attention is paid to sites of previous skin cancer, changing or new skin lesions, and sun-exposed areas in general. Peripheral lymph nodes are palpated if there is a history of skin cancer with above average metastatic potential, such as SCC of the lip.

Prevention of NMSC mainly involves protection from the sun. Suntans should be avoided because they are a sign of, and response to, UV damage. The skin should be protected with a combination of clothing and SPF 30 sunblock effective against both UV-A and UV-B wavelengths. Hats should have a 360-degree brim to protect the neck and ears as well as the face. Sunglasses that block UV light should be worn to protect the eyes, eyelids, and periorbital skin. Outdoor daylight activities are best restricted to the early morning, late afternoon, and early evening. The peak sunlight hours of 10 am to 3 pm are best avoided by planning indoor activities during this period. The UV index is a daily rating of local UV intensity on a scale of 1 through 10. Although the scale can be useful in assessment of relative sun exposure risk, the best practice is always to follow the sun protection measures just outlined. Protect children, because sun-induced genetic damage begins in childhood, and most persons receive most of their lifelong sun exposure before adulthood. Retinoids, antioxidants, and COX-2 inhibitors may be beneficial for chemoprevention of NMSC.

WHEN AND HOW TO PERFORM BIOPSY

Unless logistical reasons preclude it, biopsy should be performed on all lesions suspected of being NMSC to establish the correct diagnosis, plan definitive therapy, and obtain prognostic information. The most important subjective symptoms can be summarized under the heading “change”. The changes may be appearance of a new growth or a change in the size, shape, color, sensation (itch or pain), crusting, or bleeding of a pre-existing lesion.

For most cases of NMSC, standard shave biopsy performed with a scalpel or razor blade is adequate. Well-differentiated SCC and keratoacanthoma can be difficult to diagnose unless the deepest portions are included in the biopsy specimen, because these often are the areas most likely to yield enough information for a diagnosis. Deep shave, punch, incisional, or excisional biopsy often is preferable to standard shave biopsy in these cases. For large or ill-defined tumors it is frequently helpful to perform multiple mapping biopsies to identify the most biologically aggressive features, define margins, and plan treatment.

Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. - www.mdconsult.com

Abeloff: Abeloff's Clinical Oncology, 4th ed.

Copyright © 2008 Churchill Livingstone, An Imprint of Elsevier

REFERENCES

Genetics of Skin Cancer

  1. Aszterbaum M, Rothman A, Johnson RL, et al: Identification of mutations in the human PATCHED gene in sporadic basal cell carcinomas and in patients with the basal cell nevus syndrome. J Invest Dermatol1998; 110:885-888.
  2. Brash DE, Rudolph JA, Simon JA, et al: A role for sunlight in skin cancer: UV-induced p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1991; 88:10124-10128.
  3. Bootsma D, Kraemer KH, Cleaver JE, Hoeijmakers JHJ: Nucleotide excision repair syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophy. In Vogelstein BV, Kinzier K (eds): The Genetic Basis of Human Cancer. New York, McGraw-Hill, pp 245–274.
  4. van Elsas A, Zerp SF, van der Flier S, et al: Relevance of ultraviolet-induced N-ras oncogene point mutations in development of primary human cutaneous melanoma. Am J Pathol1996; 149:883-893.
  5. van der Schroeff JG, Evers LM, Boot AJ, Bos JL: Ras oncogene mutations in basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas of human skin. J Invest Dermatol1990; 94:423-425.
  6. Miller DL, Weinstock MA: Nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States: incidence. J Am Acad Dermatol1994; 30:774-778.
  7. Athar M, Tang X, Lee JO, et al: Hedgehog signalling in skin development and cancer. Exp Dermatol2006; 15:667-677.
  8. Hahn H, Wicking C, Zaphiropoulous PG, et al: Mutations of the human homolog of Drosophila patched in the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Cell1996; 85:841-851.
  9. Wicking C, Berkman J, Wainwright B, Chenevix-Trench G: Fine genetic mapping of the gene for nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Genomics1994; 22:505-511.
  10. Goldstein AM, Stewart C, Bale AI, et al: Localization of the gene for the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Am J Hum Genet1994; 54:765-773.
  11. Johnson RL, Rothman AL, Xie J, et al: Human homolog of patched, a candidate gene for the basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Science1996; 272:1668-1671.
  12. Parada LF, Land H, Weinberg RA, et al: Cooperation between gene encoding p53 tumour antigen and ras in cellular transformation. Nature1984; 312:649-651.
  13. Ziegler A, Jonason AS, Leffell DJ, et al: Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature1994; 372:773-776.
  14. Dumaz N, Stary A, Soussi T, et al: Can we predict solar ultraviolet radiation as the causal event in human tumours by analyzing the mutation spectra of the p53 gene?. Mutat Res1994; 307:375-386.
  15. Brash DE: Roles of the transcription factor p53 in keratinocyte carcinomas. Br J Dermatol2006; 154:516-521.
  16. Tsao H: Genetics of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Arch Dermatol2001; 137:1486-1492.
  17. Lehman AR: DNA repair-deficient diseases, xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, and trichothiodystrophe. Biochimie2003; 85:1101-1111.
  18. Williams C, Ponten F, Ahmadian A, et al: Clones of normal keratinocytes and a variety of simultaneously present epidermal neoplastic lesions contain a multitude of p53 gene mutations in a xeroderma pigmentosum patient. Cancer Res1998; 58:2449-2455.
  19. Daya-Grosjean L, Robert C, Drougard C, et al: High mutation frequency in ras genes of skin tumors isolated from DNA repair deficient xeroderma pigmentosum patients. Cancer Res1993; 53:1625-1629.
  20. Cohen PR, Kohn SR, Kurzrock R: Association of sebaceous gland tumors and internal malignancy: the Muir-Torre syndrome. Am J Med1991; 90:606-613.
  21. Peltomaki P, Aaltonen LA, Sistonen P, et al: Genetic mapping of a locus predisposing to human colorectal cancer. Science1993; 260:810-812.
  22. Fishel R, Lescoe MK, Rao MR, et al: The human mutator gene homolog MSH2 and its association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cell1993; 75:1027-1038.
  23. Ponti G, Ponz de Leon M: Muir-Torre syndrome. Lancet Oncol2005; 6:980-987.
  24. Halling KC, Honchel R, Pittelkow MR, Thibodieau SN: Microsatellite instability in keratoacanthoma. Cancer1995; 76:1765-1771.
  25. Lieu FM, Yamanishi K, Konishi K, et al: Low incidence of H-ras oncogene mutations in human epidermal tumors. Cancer Lett1991; 59:231-235.
  26. Friedman E, Gejman PV, Martin GA, McCormick F: Nonsense mutations in the C-terminal SH2 region of the GTPase activating protein (GAP) gene in human tumors. Nat Genet1993; 5:242-247.


Basal Cell Carcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma

  1. Diepgen TL, Mahler V: The epidemiology of skin cancer. Br J Dermatol2002; 146(Suppl 61):1-6.
  2. Marcil I, Stern RS: Risk of developing a subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer: a critical review of the literature and meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol2000; 136:1524-1530.
  3. Karagas MR, Greenberg ER, Spencer SK, et al: Increase in incidence rates of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancer in New Hampshire, USA: New Hampshire Skin Cancer Study Group. Int J Cancer1999; 81:555-559.
  4. Gallagher RP, Hill GB, Bajdik CD, et al: Sunlight exposure, pigmentary factors, and risk of nonmelanocytic skin cancer. I. Basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol1995; 131:157-163.
  5. Leffell DJ, Fitzgerald DA: Basal cell carcinoma. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, et al ed. Dermatology in General Medicine, New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999:857-864.
  6. Halder RM, Bang KM: Skin cancer in blacks in the United States. Dermatol Clin1988; 6:397-405.
  7. Asada M, Schaart FM, de Almeida Jr HL, et al: Solid basal cell epithelioma (BCE) possibly originates from the outer root sheath of the hair follicle. Acta Derm Venereol1993; 73:286-292.
  8. Korman NJ, Hrabovsky SL: Basal cell carcinomas display extensive abnormalities in the hemidesmosome anchoring fibril complex. Exp Dermatol1993; 2:139-144.
  9. Shanley SM, Dawkins H, Wainwright BJ, et al: Fine deletion mapping on the long arm of chromosome 9 in sporadic and familial basal cell carcinomas. Hum Mol Genet1995; 4:129-133.
  10. Bodak N, Queille S, Avril MF, et al: High levels of patched gene mutations in basal-cell carcinomas from patients with xeroderma pigmentosum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1999; 96:5117-5122.
  11. Grossman D, Leffell DJ: The molecular basis of nonmelanoma skin cancer: new understanding. Arch Dermatol1997; 133:1263-1270.
  12. Morton CA, Brown SB, Collins S, et al: Guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy: report of a workshop of the British Photodermatology Group. Br J Dermatol2002; 146:552-567.
  13. Kowalzick L, Rogozinski T, Wimheuer R, et al: Intralesional recombinant interferon β-1a in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma: results of an open-label multicentre study. Eur J Dermatol2002; 12:558-561.
  14. Sterry W, Herrera E, Takwale A, et al: Imiquimod 5% cream for the treatment of superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma: randomized studies comparing low-frequency dosing with and without occlusion. Br J Dermatol2002; 147:1227-1236.
  15. Romagosa R, Saap L, Givens M, et al: A pilot study to evaluate the treatment of basal cell carcinoma with 5-fluorouracil using phosphatidyl choline as a transepidermal carrier. Dermatol Surg2000; 26:338-340.
  16. Levine N: Role of retinoids in skin cancer treatment and prevention. J Am Acad Dermatol1998; 39:S62-S66.
  17. Thissen MR, Neumann MH, Schouten LJ: A systematic review of treatment modalities for primary basal cell carcinomas. Arch Dermatol1999; 135:1177-1183.
  18. Randle HW: Basal cell carcinoma: identification and treatment of the high-risk patient. Dermatol Surg1996; 22:255-261.
  19. Wolf DJ, Zitelli JA: Surgical margins for basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol1987; 123:340-344.
  20. Robinson JK: Use of a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of advanced basal cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Am Acad Dermatol1987; 17:770-774.
  21. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day Jr CL: Long-term recurrence rates in previously untreated (primary) basal cell carcinoma: implications for patient follow-up. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1989; 15:315-328.
  22. Marghoob A, Kopf AW, Bart RS, et al: Risk of another basal cell carcinoma developing after treatment of a basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol1993; 28:22-28.
  23. Czarnecki D, Mar A, Staples M, et al: The development of nonmelanocytic skin cancers in people with a history of skin cancer. Dermatology1994; 189:364-367.
  24. Altman A, Rosen T, Tschen JA, et al: Basal cell epithelioma in black patients. J Am Acad Dermatol1987; 17:741-745.
  25. Gallagher RP, Ma B, McLean DI, et al: Trends in basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma of the skin from 1973 through 1987. J Am Acad Dermatol1990; 23:413-421.
  26. Gallagher RP, Hill GB, Bajdik CD, et al: Sunlight exposure, pigmentation factors, and risk of nonmelanocytic skin cancer. II. Squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol1995; 131:164-169.
  27. Vitasa BC, Taylor HR, Strickland PT, et al: Association of nonmelanoma skin cancer and actinic keratosis with cumulative solar ultraviolet exposure in Maryland watermen. Cancer1990; 65:2811-2817.
  28. Gallagher RP, Bajdik CD, Fincham S, et al: Chemical exposures, medical history, and risk of squamous and basal cell carcinoma of the skin. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev1996; 5:419-424.
  29. Schwartz RA, Stoll HL: Squamous cell carcinoma. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, et al ed. Dermatology in General Medicine, New York: McGraw-Hll; 1999.
  30. Gupta AK, Cardella CJ, Haberman HF: Cutaneous malignant neoplasms in patients with renal transplants. Arch Dermatol1986; 122:1288-1293.
  31. Berg D, Otley CC: Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol2002; 47:1-17.
  32. Livneh Z, Cohen-Fix O, Skaliter R, Elizur T: Replication of damaged DNA and the molecular mechanism of ultraviolet light mutagenesis. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol1993; 28:465-513.
  33. Alcalay J, Freeman SE, Goldberg LH, Wolf JE: Excision repair of pyrimidine dimmers induced by simulated solar radiation in the skin of patients with basal cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol1990; 95:506-509.
  34. Kripke ML: Immunologic mechanisms in UV radiation carcinogenesis. Adv Cancer Res1981; 34:69-106.
  35. Ullrich SE: Modulation of immunity by ultraviolet radiation: Key effects on antigen presentation. J Invest Dermatol1995; 105(suppl 1):30S-36S.
  36. Wang XM, McNiff JM, Klump V, et al: An unexpected spectrum of p53 mutations from squamous cell carcinomas in psoriasis patients treated with PUVA. Photochem Photobiol1997; 66:294-299.
  37. Chen W, Barthelman M, Martinez J, et al: Inhibition of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer formation in epidermal p53 gene of UV-irradiated mice by alpha-tocopherol. Nutr Cancer1997; 29:205-211.
  38. Diem C, Runger TM: Processing of three different types of DNA damage in cell lines of a cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma progression model. Carcinogenesis1997; 18:657-662.
  39. Kawara S, Takata M, Takehara K: High frequency of DNA aneuploidy detected by DNA flow cytometry in Bowen's disease. J Dermatol Sci1999; 21:23-26.
  40. Wakita H, Shirahama S, Furukawa F: Distinct P-cadherin expression in cultured normal human keratinocytes and squamous cell carcinoma cell lines. Microsc Res Tech1998; 43:218-223.
  41. Mora RG, Perniciaro C: Cancer of the skin in blacks. I.A review of 163 black patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol1981; 5:535-543.
  42. Kao GF: Carcinoma arising in Bowen's disease. Arch Dermatol1986; 122:1124-1126.
  43. Goepfert H, Dichtel WJ, Medina JE, et al: Perineural invasion in squamous cell skin carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg1984; 148:542-547.
  44. Petter G, Haustein UF: Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: Histopathological features and their significance for the clinical outcome. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol1998; 11:37-44.
  45. Sedlin ED, Fleming JL: Epidermal carcinoma arising in chronic osteomyelitic foci. J Bone Joint Surg Am1963; 45:827-837.
  46. Martin H, Strong E, Spiro RH: Radiation-induced skin cancer of the head and neck. Cancer1970; 25:61-71.
  47. Dinehart SM, Pollack SV: Metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and lip: An analysis of twenty-seven cases. J Am Acad Dermatol1989; 21:241-248.
  48. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day Jr CL: Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip: Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol1992; 26:976-990.
  49. Brodland DG, Zitelli JA: Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol1992; 27:241-248.
  50. Weisberg NK, Bertagnolli MM, Becker DS: Combined sentinel lymphadenectomy and Mohs micrographic surgery for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol2000; 43:483-488.
  51. Shimm DS, Wilder RB: Radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Am J Clin Oncol1991; 14:383-386.
  52. Merimsky O, Neudorfer M, Spitzer E, Chaitchik S: Salvage cisplatin and adriamycin for advanced or recurrent basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the face. Anticancer Drugs1992; 3:481-484.
  53. Cartei G, Cartei F, Interlandi G, et al: Oral 5-fluorouracil in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in the aged. Am J Clin Oncol2000; 23:181-184.
  54. Freeman RG, Knox JM, Heaton CL: The treatment of skin cancer: A statistical study of 1,341 skin tumors comparing results obtained with irradiation, surgery, and curettage followed by electrodesiccation. Cancer1964; 17:535-538.
  55. Cherpelis BS, Marcusen C, Lang PG: Prognostic factors for metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Dermatol Surg2002; 28:268-273.
  56. Lippman SM, Parkinson DR, Itri LM, et al: 13-cis-retinoic acid and interferon alpha-2a: Effective combination therapy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Natl Cancer Inst1992; 84:235-241.
  57. Toma S, Palumbo R, Vincenti M, et al: Efficacy of recombinant alpha-interferon 2a and 13-cis-retinoic acid in the treatment of squamous cell carinoma. Ann Oncol1994; 5:463-465.


Keratoacanthoma

  1. Hodak E, Jones RE, Ackerman AB: Solitary keratoacanthoma is a squamous-cell carcinoma: three examples with metastases. Am J Dermatopathol1993; 15:332-342.
  2. Schwartz RA: Keratoacanthoma: a clinicopathologic enigma. Dermatol Surg.2004; 30:326-333.
  3. Clausen OP, Aass HC, Beigi M, et al: Are keratoacanthomas variants of squamous cell carcinomas? A comparison of chromosomal aberrations by comparative genomic hybridization. J Invest Dermatol.2006; 126:2308-2315.
  4. Batinac T, Zamolo G, Coklo M, et al: Expression of cell cycle and apoptosis regulatory proteins in keratoacanthoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract2006; 202:599-607.


Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Immunocompromised Hosts

  1. Geller AC, Annas GD: Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs2003; 19:2-11.
  2. Carucci JA: Cutaneous oncology in organ transplant recipients: meeting the challenge of squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol2004; 123:809-816.
  3. Berg D, Otley CC: Skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. J Am Acad Dermatol2002; 47:1-17.
  4. Euvard S, Ulrich C, Lefrancois N: Immunosuppressants and skin cancer in transplant patients: focus on rapamycin. Dermatol Surg2004; 30:628-633.
  5. Ulrich C, Schmook T, Sachse MM, et al: Comparative epidemiology and pathogenic factors for nonmelanoma skin cancer in organ transplant patients. Dermatol Surg2004; 30:622-627.
  6. Martinez JC, Otley CC, Stasko T, et al: Defining the clinical course of metastatic skin cancer in organ transplant recipients: a multicenter collaborative study. Arch Dermatol2003; 139:301-306.


Sebaceous Gland Carcinoma

  1. Wolfe JT, Yeates RP, Wick MR, et al: Sebaceous gland carcinoma of the eyelid: errors in clinical and pathologic diagnosis. Am J Surg Pathol1984; 8:597-606.
  2. Wick MR, Goellner JR, Wolfe JT, et al: Adnexal carcinomas of the skin. II. Extraocular sebaceous carcinomas. Cancer1985; 56:1163-1172.
  3. Jakobiec FA, To KW: Sebaceous tumors of ocular adnexa. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, Azar DT, Gragoudas ES, ed. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology, Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2000:3382-3402.
  4. Nelson BR, Hamlet KR, Gillard M, et al: Continuing medical education: sebaceous carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol1995; 33:1-15.
  5. Straatsma BR: Meibomian gland tumors. Arch Ophthalmol1956; 56:71-93.
  6. Doxanas MT, Green WR: Sebaceous gland carcinoma: a review of 40 cases. Arch Ophthalmol1984; 102:245-249.
  7. Rao NA, McLean JW, Zimmerman LE: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid and caruncle: correlation of clinicopathologic features and prognosis. In: Jakobiec FA, ed. Ocular and Adnexal Tumors, Birmingham, UK: Aesculapius; 1978:461-476.
  8. Rao NA, Hidayat AA, McLean JW, et al: Sebaceous carcinoma of the ocular adnexa: a clinicopathologic study of 104 patients with five year follow-up data. Hum Pathol1982; 13:113-122.
  9. Boniuk M, Zimmerman LE: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids, eyebrow, caruncle and orbit. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol1968; 72:619-642.
  10. Yount AB, Bylund D, Pratt SG, Greenway HT: Mohs' micrographic excision of sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1994; 20:523-529.
  11. Tan KC, Lee ST, Cheah ST: Surgical treatment of sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids with clinic-pathological correlation. Br J Plast Surg1991; 44:117-121.
  12. Ni C, Searle SS, Kuo PK: Sebaceous cell carcinomas of the ocular adnexa. Int Ophthalmol Clin1982; 22:23-61.
  13. Ni C, Kuo PK: Meibomian gland carcinoma: a clinicopathologic study of 156 cases with long-period follow up of 100 cases. Jpn J Ophthalmol1979; 23:388-401.
  14. Cohen PR, Kohn SR, Davis DA, Kurzrock R: Muir-Torre syndrome. Dermatol Clin1995; 13:79-89.
  15. Gurin DM, Rapini R: Aggressive sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid: an elusive diagnosis. Cutis1993; 52:40-42.
  16. Spencer JM, Nossa R, Tse DT, Sequeira M: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid treated with Mohs' micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol2001; 44:1004-1009.
  17. Loeffler KU, Perlman JI: Diffuse intraepithelial sebaceous carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Br J Ophthalmol1997; 81:168-170.
  18. Rumelt S, Hogan NR, Rubin PA, Jakobiec FA: Four-eyelid sebaceous cell carcinoma following irradiation. Arch Ophthalmol1998; 116:1670-1672.
  19. Dzubow LM: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid: treatment with Mohs' surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1985; 11:40-44.
  20. Shields JA, Demirci H, Marr BP, et al: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids. Personal experience with 60 cases. Ophthalmology2004; 111:2151-2157.
  21. Zurcher M, Hintschich CR, Garner A, et al: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid: a clinicopathological study. Br J Ophthalmol1998; 82:1049-1055.
  22. Khan JA, Doane JF, Grove AS: Sebaceous and meibomian carcinomas of the eyelid: recognition, diagnosis, and management. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg1991; 7:61-66.
  23. Jensen ML: Extraocular sebaceous carcinoma of the skin with visceral metastases: case report. J Cutan Pathol1990; 17:117-121.
  24. Motley RJ, Douglas-Jones AF, Holt PJ: Sebaceous carcinoma: an unusual cause of a rapidly enlarging rhinophyma. Br J Dermatol1991; 124:283-284.
  25. Snow SN, Larson PO, Lucarelli MJ, et al: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids treated by Mohs' micrographic surgery: report of nine cases with review of the literature. Dermatol Surg2002; 28:623-631.
  26. Rinaggio J, McGuff HS, Otto R, Hickson C: Postauricular sebaceous carcinoma arising in association with nevus sebaceus. Head Neck2002; 24:212-216.
  27. Mohs FE, Blanchard L: Microscopically controlled surgery for extramammary Paget's disease. Arch Dermatol1979; 115:706-708.
  28. Snow SN, Larson PO, Hardy S, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin and mucosa: report of 12 cutaneous cases with 2 cases arising from the nasal mucosa. Dermatol Surg2001; 27:165-170.
  29. Font RL: Eyelids and lacrimal drainage system. In: Spencer WH, ed. Ophthalmic Pathology: An Atlas and Textbook, 3rd ed.. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1986:2169-2174.
  30. Bentley TJ, Koranda FC, Miller LM: Histologic evaluation of horizontal frozen sections: improved staining and special staining techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1982; 8:466-472.
  31. Folberg R, Whitaker DC, Tse DT, Nerad JA: Recurrent and residual sebaceous carcinoma after Mohs' excision of the primary lesion. Am J Ophthalmol1987; 103:817-823.
  32. Putterman AM: Conjunctival map biopsy to determine pagetoid spread. Am J Ophthalmol1986; 102:87-90.
  33. Rapini RP: Comparison of methods for checking surgical margins. J Am Acad Dermatol1990; 23:288-294.
  34. Pardo FS, Wang CC, Albert D, et al: Sebaceous carcinoma of the ocular adnexa: radiotherapeutic management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1989; 17:643-647.
  35. Cottel WI, Bailin PL, Albom MJ, et al: Essential of Mohs' micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1988; 14:11-13.
  36. Hruza G: Mohs' micrographic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am1990; 23:845-864.
  37. Mohs FE: Chemosurgery: microscopically controlled surgery for skin cancer—past, present and future. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1978; 4:41-54.
  38. Yeates RP, Waller RR: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid: pitfalls in diagnosis. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg1985; 1:435-442.
  39. Lisman RD, Jakobiec FA, Small P: Sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelids: the role of adjuvant cryotherapy in the management of conjunctival pagetoid spread. Ophthalmology1989; 96:1021-1026.
  40. Kass LG: Role of cryotherapy in treating sebaceous carcinoma of the eyelid. Ophthalmology1990; 97:2-3.


Merkel Cell Carcinoma

  1. Toker C: Trabecular carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol1972; 105:107-110.
  2. Gruber S, Wilson L: Merkel cell carcinoma. In: Maloney ME, Miller SJ, ed. Cutaneous Oncology: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management, Boston: Blackwell; 1998.
  3. Brissett AE, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a retrospective case series. Head Neck2002; 10:982-987.
  4. Haag M, Glass LF, Fenske NA: Merkel cell carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Surg1995; 21:669-683.
  5. Gollard R, Weber R, Kosty MP, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma: review of 22 cases with surgical, pathologic and therapeutic considerations. Cancer2000; 88:1842-1851.
  6. Pectasides D, Pectasides M, Economopoulos T: Merkel cell cancer of the skin. Ann Oncol2006; 17:1489-1495.
  7. Pitale M, Sessions R, Husain S: An analysis of prognostic factors in cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Laryngoscope1992; 102:244-249.
  8. Shaw JH, Rumball E: Merkel cell tumour: clinical behaviour and treatment. Br J Surg1991; 78:138-142.
  9. Silva EG, Mackay B, Goepfert H, et al: Endocrine carcinoma of the skin (Merkel cell carcinoma). Pathol Annu1984; 19:1-30.
  10. Sharma D, Flora G, Grunberg SM: Chemotherapy of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: case report and review of the literature. Am J Clin Oncol1991; 14:166-169.
  11. Anderson LL, Phipps TJ, McCollough ML: Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin (Merkel cell carcinoma) in a black. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1992; 18:375-380.
  12. Kuppuswami N, Sivarajan KM, Hussein L, et al: Merkel cell tumor in pregnancy: a case report. J Reprod Med1991; 36:613-615.
  13. Saadi Ak, Danks JJ, Cree IA, Collin JR: Merkel cell tumour: case reports and review. Orbit1999; 18:45-52.
  14. Meland NB, Jackson IT: Merkel cell tumor: diagnosis, prognosis and management. Plast Reconstr Surg1986; 77:632-638.
  15. Sibley RK, Dehner LP, Rosai J: Primary neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma of the skin. I. A clinicopathologic and ultrastructural study of 43 cases. Am J Surg Pathol1985; 9:95-108.
  16. Kanitakis J, Euvrard S, Chouvet B, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma in organ transplant recipients: report of two cases with unusual histologic features and literature review. J Cut Pathol2006; 33:686-694.
  17. Best TJ, Metcalfe JB, Moore RB, Nguyen GK: Merkel cell carcinoma of the scrotum. Ann Plast Surg1994; 33:83.83
  18. Yang GC, Schneck MJ, Hayden RE, Gupta PK: Merkel cell tumor-like endocrine carcinoma associated with the submandibular gland: report of case with cytologic, immunohistochemical, electron microscopic and flow cytometric studies. Acta Cytol1994; 38:742-746.
  19. Canales LI, Parker A, Kadakia S: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding from Merkel cell carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol1992; 87:1464-1466.
  20. Collins MK, Cameron FG: Solitary regional bony recurrence in Merkel cell carcinoma. Australas Radiol1993; 37:277-278.
  21. Catlett JP, Todd WM, Carr Jr ME: Merkel cell tumor in an HIV-positive patient. Va Med Q1992; 119:256-258.
  22. Boyle F, Pendelbury S, Bell D: Further insights into the natural history and management of primary cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys1995; 31:315-323.
  23. Grosh WW, Giannone L, Hande KR, Johnson DH: Disseminated Merkel cell tumor: treatment with systemic chemotherapy. Am J Clin Oncol1987; 10:227-230.
  24. Lentz SR, Krewson L, Zutter MM: Recurrent neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma of the skin presenting as marrow failure in a man with systemic lupus erythematosus. Med Pediatr Oncol1993; 21:137-141.
  25. Formica M, Basolo B, Funaro L, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma in a renal transplant recipient (letter). Nephron1994; 68:399.
  26. Ratner D, Nelson BR, Brown M, Johnson TM: Merkel cell carcinoma (review). J Am Acad Dermatol1993; 29:143-156.
  27. Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G: Histopathology of the Skin, 7th ed.. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott, 1990.
  28. Frigerio B, Capella C, Eusbi V, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin: the structure and origin of normal Merkel cells. Histopathology1983; 7:229-249.
  29. Leboit PE, Crutcher WA, Shapiro PE: Pagetoid intraepidermal spread in Merkel cell (primary neuroendocrine) carcinoma of the skin. Am J Surg Pathol1992; 16:584-592.
  30. Gould VE, Dardi LE, Memoli VA, Johannessen JV: Neuroendocrine carcinomas of the skin: light microscopic, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical analysis. Ultrastruct Pathol1980; 1:499-509.
  31. Gould VE, Moll R, Moll I, et al: Biology of disease. Neuroendocrine (Merkel) cell of the skin: hyperplasias, dysplasias, and neoplasms. Lab Invest1985; 52:334-353.
  32. Tang CK, Nedwich A, Toker C, Zaman ANF: Unusual cutaneous carcinoma with features of small cell (oat cell-like) and squamous cell carcinomas. Am J Dermatopathol1982; 4:537-548.
  33. Alam M: Management of Merkel cell carcinoma. What we know. Arch Dermatol2006; 142:771-774.
  34. Sidhu GS, Feiner H, Flotte TJ, et al: Merkel cell neoplasms: histology, electron microscopy, biology and histogenesis. Am J Dermatopathol1980; 2:101-119.
  35. Leong AS, Phillips GE, Pieterse AS, Milios J: Criteria for the diagnosis of primary endocrine carcinoma of the skin (Merkel cell carcinoma): a histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of 13 cases. Pathology1986; 18:393-399.
  36. Tope WD, Sargueza OP: Merkel cell carcinoma: histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and cytogenetic analysis. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1994; 20:648-652.
  37. Lewis KG, Weinstock MA, Weaver AL, Otley CC: Adjuvant local radiation for Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol2006; 142:693-699.
  38. Wick MR, Goellenr JR, Scheithauer BW: Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin (Merkel cell tumor): a clinical, histological and ultrastructural study of 13 cases. Am J Clin Pathol1983; 79:6-13.
  39. Hanke CW, Conner AC, Temofeew RK, Lingeman RE: Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol1989; 125:1096-1100.
  40. Bayrou O, Avril MF, Charpentier MD, et al: Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin: clinicopathologic study of 18 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol1991; 24:198-207.
  41. Safai B: Management of skin cancer. In: Devita Jr VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, ed. Principles and Practice of Oncology, Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1997:1905.
  42. Mohs FE: Chemosurgery: Microscopically Controlled Surgery for Skin Cancer, Springfield, Ill, Charles C Thomas, 1978.
  43. Goepfert H, Remmler D, Silva E, Wheeler B: Merkel cell carcinoma (endocrine carcinoma of the skin) of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol1984; 110:707-712.
  44. Kurul S, Mudun A, Aksakal N, Aygen M: Lymphatic mapping for Merkel cell carcinoma. Plast Reconstr Surg2000; 105:680-683.
  45. Feun LG, Sararaj N, Legha SS, et al: Chemotherapy for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer1988; 62:683-685.
  46. Redmond III J, Perry J, Sowray P, et al: Chemotherapy of disseminated Merkel-cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol1991; 14:305-307.
  47. Queirolo P, Gipponi M, Peressini A, et al: Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin: treatment of primary, recurrent, and metastatic disease—review of clinical cases. Anticancer Res1997; 17:673-678.
  48. O'Rourke MGE, Bell JR: Merkel cell tumor with spontaneous regression. Dermatol Surg Oncol1986; 12:994-997.
  49. Kayashima KI, Ono T, Johno M, et al: Spontaneous regression in Merkel cell (neuroendocrine) carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol1991; 127:550-553.
  50. Duncan WC, Tschen JA: Spontaneous regression of Merkel cell (neuroendocrine) carcinoma of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol1986; 12:653-654.


Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans

  1. Darier J, Ferrand M: Dermatofibromes progressifs et recidivants ou fibrosarcomes de la peau. Ann Dermatol Syphiliga1924; 5:545-562.
  2. Hoffman E: Veher das knollentribende Fibrosarkam der Haut (dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans). Dermatol Z1925; 43:1-28.
  3. Bendix-Hansen K, Myhre-Jensen D, Haae S: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathological study of nineteen cases and a review of world literature. Scand J Plast Reconstruct Surg Hand Surg1983; 17:247-252.
  4. Burkhardt BR, Soule EH, Winkelmann RK, et al: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: study of fifty-six cases. Am J Surg1966; 111:638-644.
  5. Pack GT, Tabah EJ: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a report of 39 cases. Arch Surg1951; 62:391-411.
  6. Chaung TY, Su WPD, Muller SA: Incidence of T cell lymphoma and other rare skin cancers in a defined population. J Am Acad Dermatol1990; 23:254-256.
  7. Gloster HM: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Am Acad Dermatol1996; 35:355-374.
  8. Taylor HB, Helwig EB: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a study of 115 cases. Cancer1962; 15:717-725.
  9. McKee PH, Fletcher CD: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans in infancy and childhood. J Cutan Pathol1991; 18:241-246.
  10. Schuarez LW: Congenital dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the hand. Hand1977; 9:182-186.
  11. Annessi G, Cimisan A, Girolomoni G, et al: Congenital dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Pediatr Dermatol1993; 10:40-42.
  12. Rutgers EJ, Kroon BR, Albus-Lutter LE, et al: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: treatment and prognosis. Eur J Surg Oncol1992; 18:241-248.
  13. Monnier D, Vidal C, Martin L, et al: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a population-based cancer descriptive study of 66 consecutive cases diagnosed between 1982 and 2002. Eur Acad Derm Venereol2006; 20:1237-1242.
  14. Bang KM, Halder RM, White JE, et al: Skin cancer in black Americans: a review of 126 cases. J Natl Med Assoc1987; 79:51-58.
  15. Costa OG: Progressive recurrent dermatofibrosarcoma (Darier-Ferrand): anatomoclinical study. Arch Dermatol1946; 54:432-454.
  16. McMaster PE: Sarcomatoid fibroma of the skin (progressive and recurring dermatofibroma). Ann Surg1934; 99:338-347.
  17. Cook TF, Fosko SW: Unusual cutaneous malignancies. Semin Cutan Med Surg1998; 17:114-132.
  18. Allan AE, Tsou HC, Harrington A, et al: Clonal origin of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Invest Dermatol1993; 100:99-102.
  19. Pedeutour F, Simon MP, Minoletti F, et al: Ring 22 chromosomes in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans are low level amplifiers of chromosome 17 and 22l sequences. Cancer Res1995; 55:2400-2403.
  20. Mandahl N, Heim S, Willen H, et al: Supernumerary ring chromosome as the sole cytogenetic abnormality in a dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Cancer Genet Cytogenet1990; 49:273-275.
  21. Bridge JA, Neff JR, Sanberg AA: Cytogenetic analysis of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Cancer Genet Cytogenet1990; 49:199-202.
  22. Bashara NE, Jules K, Potter G: DFSP: 4 years after local trauma. J Foot Surg1992; 31:160-165.
  23. Barnes L, Coleman JA, Johnson JT: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol1984; 110:398-404.
  24. Coard K, Branday JM, LaGrenade L: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a 10 year clinicopathological review of an uncommon tumor. West Indian Med J1994; 43:130-133.
  25. Morman MR, Lin RY, Petrozzi JN: Dermatofibrosarcoma arising in a site of multiple immunizations. Arch Dermatol1979; 115:1453.
  26. Schneidman D, Belizaire R: Arsenic exposure followed by the development of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. Cancer1986; 58:1585-1587.
  27. Shelley WB: Malignant melanoma and dermatofibrosarcoma in a 60-year-old patient with a life long history of acrodermatitis enteropathica. J Am Acad Derm1982; 6:63-66.
  28. Melezea M, Duorsky C: Acanthosis nigracans bei Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans mit multiplen Hautmetastasen. Hautarzt1957; 8:54.
  29. Dupree WB, Langloss JW, Weiss SW: Pigmented dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (Bednar tumor): a pathologic, ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol1985; 9:630-639.
  30. Page EH, Assaad DM: Atrophic dermatofibroma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Am Acad Dermatol1987; 17:947-950.
  31. Sagi A, Ben-Yakar Y, Mahler D: A ten-year-old boy with dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the face. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1987; 13:82-83.
  32. Hess K, Hanke CW, Estes NC, et al: Chemosurgical reports: myxoid dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Derm Surg Oncol1985; 11:268-271.
  33. Zamecnik M, Michal M: Myxoid variant of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with fibrosarcomatous areas. Zentralbl Pathol1993; 139:373-376.
  34. Ruiz-Tovar J, Guarino MF, Callejas ME, et al: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: review of 20 years expereince. Clin Transl Oncol2006; 8:606-610.
  35. Jimenez FJ, Grichnik JM, Buchanan MD, Clark RE: Immunohistochemical margin control applied to Mohs' micrographic surgical excision of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1994; 20:687-689.
  36. Peters CW, Hanke CW, Pasarell HA, Bennett JE: Chemosurgical reports: dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the face. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1982; 10:823-826.
  37. Parker TL, Zitelli JA: Surgical margins for excision of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Am Acad Dermatol1995; 32:233-236.
  38. Robinson JK: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans resected by Mohs' surgery (chemosurgery): a 5 year prospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol1985; 12:1093-1098.
  39. Hobbs ER, Wheeland RG, Bailin PL, et al: Treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans with Mohs' micrographic surgery. Ann Surg1980; 287:102-107.
  40. Dawes KW, Hanke CW: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with Mohs' micrographic surgery: cure rates and surgical margins. Dermatol Surg1996; 22:530-534.
  41. Ratner D, Thomas CO, Johnson TM, et al: Mohs' micrographic surgery for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. J Am Acad Dermatol1997; 37:600-613.
  42. Haycox CL, Odland PB, Olbricht SM, Casey B: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP): growth characteristics based on tumor modeling and a review of cases treated with Mohs' micrographic surgery. Ann Plast Surg1997; 38:246-251.
  43. Rockley PF, Robinson JK, Magid M, Goldblatt D: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the scalp: a series of cases. J Am Acad Dermatol1989; 21:278-283.
  44. Snow SN, Gordon EM, Larson PO, et al: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a report on 29 patients treated by Mohs' micrographic surgery with long-term follow-up and review of the literature. Cancer2004; 101:28-38.
  45. Savoia P, Ortoncelli M, Quaglino P, Bernengo MG: Imatinib mesylate in the treatment of large unresectable dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a case study. Dermatol Surg2006; 32:1097-1132.
  46. Ding J, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a clinicopathological review with emphasis on fibrosarcomatous areas. Am J Surg Pathol1992; 16:921-925.


Angiosarcoma

  1. Maddox JC, Evans HC: Angiosarcoma of the skin and soft tissue: a study of 44 cases. Cancer1981; 48:1907-1921.
  2. Hodgkinson DJ, Soule EH, Woods J: Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the head and neck. Cancer1979; 144:1106-1113.
  3. Holden CA, Spittle MF, Wilson Jones E: Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp, prognosis and treatment. Cancer1987; 59:1046-1057.
  4. Wilson Jones E: Malignant vascular tumors. Clin Exp Dermatol1976; 1:287-312.
  5. Simon SI, Sika JV, Lynfield YL: Angiosarcoma of the scalp. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1980; 11:935-937.
  6. Tay YK, Ong BH: Cutaneous angiosarcoma presenting as recurrent angioedema of the face. Br J Dermatol2000; 143:1346-1348.
  7. Smith L, Buzdar AU, Rusch V, et al: Postmastectomy angiosarcoma: case report and review of the literature. Tex Med1984; 80:43-44.
  8. Rosai J, Sumner H, Kostianovsky M, Perez-Mesa C: Angiosarcoma of the skin. Hum Pathol1976; 7:83-109.
  9. Farr H, Carandang C, Huvos A: Malignant vascular tumors of the head and neck. Am J Surg1970; 120:501-504.
  10. Mehregan A, Usndek H: Malignant angioendothelioma. Arch Dermatol1976; 112:1565-1567.
  11. Panje W, Moran W, Bostwick D: Angiosarcoma of the head and neck: review of 11 cases. Laryngoscope1986; 96:1381-1384.
  12. Haustein U: Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp. Int J Dermatol1991; 30:851-856.
  13. Bennett R, Keller J, Ditty J: Hemangiosarcoma subsequent to radiotherapy for hemangioma in infancy. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1978; 4:881-883.
  14. Ward C, Buchanan R: Hemangiosarcoma following irradiation of a hemangioma of the face. J Maxillofac Surg1977; 5:164-166.
  15. Narula A, Vallis M, El-Silimy O: Radiation induced angiosarcoma of the nasopharynx. Eur J Surg Oncol1986; 12:147-152.
  16. Kibe Y, Kishimoto S, Katoh N, et al: Angiosarcoma of the scalp associated with renal transplantation. Br J Dermatol1997; 136:752-756.
  17. Bullen R, Larson PO, Landeck AE, et al: Angiosarcoma of the head and neck managed by a combination of multiple biopsies to determine tumor margin and radiation therapy: report of three cases and review of the literature. Dermatol Surg1998; 24:1105-1110.
  18. Tahir M, Hendry P, Baird L, et al: Radiation induced angiosarcoma a sequela of radiotherapy for breast cancer following conservative surgery. Int Sem Surg Oncol2006; 3:26-30.
  19. Mentzel T, Kutzner H, Wollina U: Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a case resembling rosacea clinically. J Am Acad Dermatol1998; 38:387.340
  20. Stewart FW, Treves N: Lymphangiosarcoma in postmastectomy lymphedema. Cancer1948; 1:64-81.
  21. Shirger A: Postoperative lymphedema: etiologic and diagnostic factors. Med Clin North Am1962; 46:1045-1050.
  22. Alessi E, Sala F, Berti E: Angiosarcoma in lymphedematous limbs. Am J Dermatolpathol 196;8:371–378.
  23. Offori TW, Platt CC, Stephens M, et al: Angiosarcoma in congenital hereditary lymphedema (Milroy's disease): diagnostic beacons and review of the literature. Clin Exp Dermatol1992; 18:174-177.
  24. Kirchmann TT, Smoller BR, McGuire J: Cutaneous angiosarcoma as a second malignancy in a lymphedematous leg in a Hodgkin's disease survivor. J Am Acad Dermatol1994; 31:861-866.
  25. Goette DK, Detlefs RL: Postirradiation angiosarcoma. J Am Acad Dermatol1985; 12:922-926.
  26. Girard C, Johnson WC, Graham J: Cutaneous angiosarcoma. Cancer1970; 26:868-883.
  27. Muller R, Hajdu SI, Brennan MF: Lymphangiosarcoma associated with chronic filarial lymphedema. Cancer1987; 59:179-183.
  28. Scully RF, Mark EJ, McNeely WF, et al: Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital, weekly clinicopathological exercises: case 18–1993—a 57-year old man with chronic lymphedema and enlarging purple cutaneous nodules of the leg. N Engl J Med1993; 328:1337-1343.
  29. Lever WF, Schaumburg-Lever G: Histopathology of the Skin, 7th ed.. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1990:708-711.
  30. Stewart NJ, Prithard DJ, Nascimento AG, et al: Lymphangiosarcoma following mastectomy. Clin Orthop1995; 320:135-141.
  31. Lewis JJ, Brennan MF: Soft tissue sarcomas. Curr Probl Surg1996; 33:817-872.
  32. Golden DJ, Kim YA: Angiosarcoma of the scalp treated with Mohs' micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1993; 19:156-158.
  33. Mikhail G, Kelly A: Malignant angioendothelioma of the face. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1977; 3:181-183.
  34. Clayton BD, Leshin B, Hithcock MG, et al: Utility of rush paraffin-embedded tangential sections in the management of cutaneous neoplasms. Dermatol Surg2000; 26:671-678.
  35. Graham W, Bogardus C: Angiosarcoma treated with radiation therapy alone. Cancer1981; 48:912-914.
  36. Cerroni L, Peris K, Legge A, Chimenti S: Angiosarcoma of the face and scalp: a case report with complete spontaneous regression. J Dermatol Surg Oncol1991; 17:539-542.
  37. Hanke CW, Sterling JB: Prolonged survival of angiosarcoma of the nose: a report of 3 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol2006; 54:883-885.


If you find an error or have any questions, please email us at admin@doctorlib.org. Thank you!